Central Claim
The United States has spent eighteen months applying economic, judicial, and now electoral pressure on Latin America’s largest democracy, and at each step China has been positioned to catch what Washington pushed away. The Xi-Lula call this week was not a diplomatic courtesy. It was Beijing collecting the goodwill Washington has been giving up, one sanction at a time, ahead of a Brazilian election that Washington seems determined to be seen trying to influence.
When Xi Jinping told Lula da Silva that China supports Brazil in “opposing external interference,” he was not choosing that phrase by accident. Lula has used it himself, publicly and repeatedly, for eighteen months. Over sanctions on a Supreme Court justice. Over tariffs explicitly tied to a domestic coup trial. Over a foreign government’s fingerprints on Brazil’s electoral process. Xi did not introduce a grievance. He signed his name to one Lula had already written, at the most politically useful possible moment.
Eighteen Months, One Recurring Word
The list of US actions against Brazil since early 2025 is long enough that the pattern inside it gets lost. Washington sanctioned Supreme Court Justice Alexandre de Moraes under the Global Magnitsky Act. It imposed visa bans on the judges overseeing Jair Bolsonaro’s coup-plot trial. A Section 301 investigation into Brazilian trade practices culminated in two rounds of fresh tariffs this month alone, stacked on top of the major 2025 hike that arrived the moment Bolsonaro was convicted. Then came a terrorism designation for two Brazilian criminal organizations, reaching into the country’s banking system through US material-support law in ways many Brazilian firms did not see coming.
Each of these had its own stated justification. Unfair trade practices here, judicial overreach there. But Lula has answered every single one with the same word. Interference. And now the world’s second-largest economy has said it out loud too, on record, in Brasília’s own language.
Stay ahead of the geopolitical week.
MD Briefing delivers expert analysis across five global fronts — the Indo-Pacific, energy, geoeconomics, European security, and the Middle East — every Monday morning. Free.
The Election Hiding Inside a Trade Call
The Xi-Lula call hit the expected notes. Mutual respect, expanding trade, a push to accelerate Mercosur-China negotiations. Lula repeated his line about diversifying markets, a phrase he now reaches for automatically whenever American pressure comes up. Xinhua published its version. The Brazilian presidency published its own, notably quieter on the interference language.
But the most significant moment of the week was not the phone call. Days earlier, Brazil denied entry visas to two US officials who had sought meetings with Brazilian election authorities ahead of October’s vote. Quiet, procedural, and enormous. Brazil is now treating American curiosity about its voting system as something to stop at the border, not accommodate as routine diplomatic contact.
The context matters enormously here. Flavio Bolsonaro, son of the imprisoned former president and a sitting senator, has spent recent weeks reviving unfounded claims that Brazil’s electronic voting system cannot be trusted. Trump has run the same playbook about American elections for years. Two American officials showing up to meet with electoral authorities in that exact window does not read as routine to a government already primed to see interference everywhere. Xi’s phrase landed squarely into that gap, and Lula did not need to say anything further.
Follow the Trade Numbers
The rhetoric is loud, but the data is louder. US-Brazil trade fell nearly 13 percent in the first half of 2026 compared to the same period the year before, pushing Brazilian exports to the US to their lowest share since records began in 1997. Meanwhile, Brazil’s trade with China grew by 22 percent over the same stretch. Beijing did not wait around either, announcing plans to absorb more Brazilian coffee, meat, and grain the moment American tariffs pushed those goods looking for a new buyer.
No ideology required. A soybean exporter who loses a US contract to a tariff finds another buyer. A Brazilian bank managing compliance exposure from a terrorism designation finds a way around the American financial system. Both simply route toward the largest, closest, most willing alternative, and China has spent fifteen years making itself exactly that. China has been Brazil’s largest trading partner since 2009. The current moment is not a rupture. It is an acceleration of something already well underway, with Washington providing the fuel.
Since 2009, both countries have also been settling more of their bilateral trade in their own currencies, bypassing the dollar. The terrorism designation and its compliance consequences only reinforce the logic of that arrangement. The longer Washington demonstrates that dollar-clearing infrastructure can be weaponized against Brazilian companies for political reasons, the more attractive yuan settlement becomes, not just for firms with criminal exposure but for anyone with a reason to worry about American reach.
The Rare Earths Irony
Nowhere is the self-defeat more visible than in critical minerals. Brazil holds the world’s second-largest rare earth reserves, over 11 million tons, at the precise moment Washington has declared reducing dependence on Chinese processing a strategic priority. China still controls roughly 90 percent of global processing capacity. A Brazilian alternative should be the easiest win in the entire relationship.
The US Development Finance Corporation has already put more than half a billion dollars into one Brazilian producer, Serra Verde. But the same climate of distrust built by tariffs and sanctions has Brazilian officials reportedly weighing whether to block Serra Verde’s sale to an American rare earth firm. Washington built the one lever that could actually push back against Chinese dominance in a critical sector, then spent a year giving Brazil every reason not to pull it. Neither country gets what it needs, and China keeps its processing monopoly intact.
The Scenarios
Base case (~50%): Tariff negotiations make incremental progress before October, both sides pull back from further escalation, and the Mercosur-China talks advance slowly without producing a completed agreement before the election. The Brazil-China relationship deepens at its existing pace. The US relationship stabilizes but does not recover. Whoever wins in October inherits a trade architecture tilted further toward Beijing than it was in 2024.
Downside case (~35%): Washington responds to the visa denial with further measures, the Mercosur-China talks accelerate visibly before October, and Lula uses both as campaign material. A Lula victory in October produces a Brazilian government with a fresh mandate and no particular incentive to de-escalate. The Serra Verde deal collapses. China consolidates its position as the anchor of Brazilian trade and the rare earth opening closes.
Upside case (~15%): A Flavio Bolsonaro victory in October shifts Brazil’s posture back toward Washington. Commercial actors who have suffered losses from politically motivated US decisions are not easily reassured by a change of government in Brasília. The rare earth opening may partially revive. The broader realignment, built on fifteen years of China being Brazil’s largest trading partner and eighteen months of American pressure, does not reverse quickly regardless of who is in office.
Beijing Is Collecting What Washington Is Giving Away
Washington’s Brazil policy over the past eighteen months rests on the assumption that pressure produces compliance. What it has actually produced is a Brazilian government more confident in its alternatives and a Chinese government positioned, at remarkably little cost to itself, to look like the more reliable partner.
Xi did not have to work hard for this week’s call. He did not have to sanction anyone, or threaten any tariffs, or dispatch officials to poke around Brazilian institutions ahead of an election. He just had to be in a country that wasn’t doing any of that. In a relationship as old and as large as the one between the US and Brazil, that should have been Washington’s floor, not China’s ceiling. For now, it is both.
