Lebanon’s Parliament Speaker Nabih Berri criticized a recent U. S.-brokered agreement between Lebanon and Israel, claiming it could create divisions among Lebanese and insisting it would not be enacted. He expressed that only Iran-U. S. negotiations could effectively lead to an Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon, arguing that any separation from this diplomatic track would extend Israel’s occupation. The conflict escalated when Hezbollah fired at Israel in solidarity with Iran following U. S.-Israeli actions.
The ongoing war has played a significant role in the broader U. S.-Iran conflict. Iran demands a ceasefire in Lebanon as part of its talks with the U. S., while the U. S. has facilitated separate discussions between Lebanese and Israeli officials, which Lebanon has engaged in despite Hezbollah’s resistance. Israel has welcomed the agreement, claiming it allows them to maintain their presence in southern Lebanon unless Hezbollah disarms. Conversely, Hezbollah rejects it, labeling it a capitulation to Israel.
Berri described the agreement as “dictates,” emphasizing that its most troubling element is the risk of inciting internal strife among Lebanese. He asserted that the agreement “won’t be implemented. ” The Lebanese government, led by President Joseph Aoun and Prime Minister Nawaf Salam, has sought direct dialogue with Israel since the war began, despite Hezbollah’s strong objections, revealing deep political rifts.
Additionally, Aoun communicated with U. S. President Donald Trump, hoping for pressure on Israel to exit southern Lebanon, where Israeli forces have established a security zone. Meanwhile, the Israeli military has engaged in operations against Hezbollah, while Hezbollah claims it is adhering to the ceasefire but retains the right to defend its territory.
With information from Reuters
