Faced with another summer of punishing energy costs, EU governments are once again reaching for the same short-term fixes—excise cuts, tax credits, and price caps—that have failed to deliver a lasting solution in previous crises. Behind the scramble, a more consequential and less transparent negotiation is underway: whether Europe’s flagship climate rules should be quietly renegotiated to buy industrial peace between Paris and Berlin.
The bloc’s energy divide
Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis used talks with Austrian Chancellor Christian Stocker to press Brussels to treat energy affordability as a top priority, arguing that persistent price disparities between member states undercut the EU’s claim to have built an integrated energy market. It’s a fair diagnosis, but one Greek and other leaders have made before with little follow-through: identifying the problem is easier than agreeing on who pays to fix it, and PM Mitsotakis offered no concrete mechanism for closing the gap.
A backroom deal that could quietly gut the EU’s car rules
Stay ahead of the geopolitical week.
MD Briefing delivers expert analysis across five global fronts — the Indo-Pacific, energy, geoeconomics, European security, and the Middle East — every Monday morning. Free.
Perhaps the most consequential story of the week isn’t just a public announcement but rather a negotiation happening largely out of view. Germany and France are working toward an agreement that would slow the EU’s combustion-engine phase-out, with Paris apparently willing to abandon its own long-standing push for strict COâ‚‚ rules and rapid electrification in exchange for Berlin’s backing on a French industrial policy that favors European companies in procurement and subsidies. That’s a notable reversal for a government that has positioned itself as one of the EU’s climate-policy hardliners, and it raises an obvious question: if France’s commitment to the phase-out was negotiable all along, how much of the EU’s flagship climate policy is actually built on political horse-trading rather than settled consensus? The French industry minister confirmed talks are underway, with an autumn deal targeted and other countries, including Italy, potentially being pulled in—meaning a bilateral deal could end up rewriting bloc-wide rules with limited public scrutiny.
Another state-aid exception, another crack in the single market
The European Commission has cleared a €300 million Italian state-aid package for road hauliers, according to ANSA, letting firms claim tax credits covering as much as 70% of the extra fuel costs racked up between March and June. Individually, the approval is modest. But it’s also the latest in a pattern: as national governments respond to the energy crisis with their own subsidy schemes, Brussels keeps approving exceptions to the state-aid rules that are supposed to keep the single market level. Each approval is defensible on its own terms; collectively, they raise the question of whether “temporary” crisis measures are becoming a permanent feature of how the EU manages energy shocks—with better-resourced member states inevitably able to subsidize their industries more generously than poorer ones.
Capitals scramble, but only with stopgaps.
Economy Minister Giancarlo Giorgetti confirmed Rome will cut diesel prices by €0.17 per liter through August 6, at a cost of roughly €125 million, but ruled out any relief for petrol or changes to tobacco excise duties. That’s a narrow, time-limited fix that expires just as the crisis is likely to continue: Giorgetti said Rome will only decide next week, based on July’s VAT windfall, whether to go further. La Repubblica reported the same wait-and-see approach applies to any additional relief on energy bills. In effect, Italy’s response so far amounts to a three-week bridge, not a strategy.
Prime Minister Donald Tusk floated reinstating regulated fuel prices in the second half of August if costs stay volatile—a return to direct price controls that sits uneasily with a government that has otherwise championed market liberalization. Deputy Energy Minister Wojnarowski’s suggestion that the measure could shrink to a VAT cut instead hints at internal disagreement over how far Warsaw is actually willing to intervene. Meanwhile, the energy ministry is preparing a second attempt at a windfall-profits tax after President Karol Nawrocki vetoed the first version—this time widening it to hit gas distributors as well as oil refiners, setting up a likely rerun of the same political fight.
The bigger picture: crisis management, not a crisis fix
None of this week’s measures addresses the structural problem Mitsotakis himself named: an EU energy market that still produces sharply different prices depending on which member state you happen to live in. Excise cuts, floating mechanisms, and windfall taxes are all ways of managing the symptoms nationally, not the disease collectively—and several governments are explicitly framing their measures as temporary, contingent on prices, geopolitics, or tax revenue, rather than as durable policy. Meanwhile, the more structurally important story—the apparent Franco-German trade-off over combustion-engine rules—is unfolding with none of the transparency or debate that a rewrite of EU climate law would normally invite. If that deal materializes, it will be a reminder that in Brussels, the rules that get bent hardest are often the ones negotiated quietly between the two largest member states, not the ones debated openly by all twenty-seven.
