The attributive personalities of Karl Marx and Hegel and their mummifications of thoughts on historical materialism and dialectical materialism have given contradictory reviews regarding the development of history and change in fabrics of societies respective to historical evolution. Karl Marx viewed economy as main factor behind the change in the relationships to the society while Hegel was idealist in this prospects, his position was on idea, which was behind any change. 20th National Conference of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and Xi’s aspects on Neo Chinese approaches to see the world and global existing order. Xi’s vision as revisionist by some critics while internally he is best reformist in modern China. The road to rejuvenation has dual perspectives, first represents the Chinese existing establishment’s views while there is second aspect of West.
“Ideologies are not defeated with guns, they are defeated by better ideas -a more attractive and compelling vision “ -Barack Obama, Ex – President of US.
China always remained neutral throughout its history. China always predicted being non-interference nation.
China historical position remained as neutral state. Chinese claims of being isolated in history from war and glamour of the world. The era of globalization depicts the same situation of china. Silk road is not a novel concept of china rather it’s a revision of old model of Chinese connectivity with the world. After 2013, Xi gets in new ambition to rise up China as economic giant at global levels. Built and Road Initiatives is physical implementations of new dreams of China under the leadership of Xi Jinping.Xi always presented himself as neo Chinese ambitious perpetrator. It is a new fantastic move of china to hold on global politics with geostrategic and geopolitical moves. Xi announced that China will never move as aggressive state at any global platform and will never manipulate the existing global order. It is assertions of China to take its national interest at first hands. The claims over South China Sea and border tensions with India as structural positioning of China under existing order and claims believed to true in senses of Chinese rights to assert its positions according to the international law.
Second announcements are very dogmatic in senses of western stimulations. Current position of west is obvious in this respective that China is seemed to be new guzzle of hurdles in existing global world order. Multiperspective critiques are social in west about Chinese moves. The theory of Clash of Civilization, where Samuel Huntington engages in the minds of readers that this tussle and muscles building is inevitable in new arena. This platoon of new horizons between west and east seem to be real and happening.
Western perspective is colloquial for China. West, which is the birth place of existing global order and champion of liberal democracy makes a stunt position regarding its system. Former Prime Minister of Australia, Kevin Rudd’s critique on China reluctantly showed the second perspective regarding China. According to it China is internally under coercive authority of Xi. Xi always pressurized the dissent and so called existing liberty. Concentration camps are generic evidence of it. After zero COVID-19 policy, Xi seemed more repressive for internal domains and externally abandoned the diplomatic lessons of Deng Xiaoping. Xi always insisted upon the nature of history and social improvisation link with lessons of history. Xi more persuasive stance over Western hegemonic order and new assertive claims of ” fairer and more justice international system ” to be build. Xi stronger control over state apparatus as well decline in free based enterprises. The mystery of Jack Ma is still in consistent to find. The opposition among the Chinese own firms and fear of Communist Party led Xi more aggressive to any kind of dissent are some evidentiary reports about perspective.
It would be a fierce opinion to build in between the situations, realism in international relationships emphasis on national powers and depicts morality has no aspirations in international relationships. So it would be an authentic drama on the stages of both parts of the world. It is comprehensive truth that China is moving ahead with fast spinning balls of economy .US led economic model is necessity of every state to move effective and even china accept these facts that they can’t move ahead barely relying own their own internal adjustment models of neo Marxist values. Western position and objections on Chinese rejuvenations of a new china under the leadership of Xi Jinping may have some factual positions and may have some propagations of interests under neo modules of cold war but the world must not negate that the china is important international player and china also must give due importance to global values of liberalism under existing order inside and outside. Ultimately, the most vulnerable situations are the impacts on common man as a grass between two elephant’s states. There must be consensual and reformative agendas to be built for the betterment of the world.
