Ju Hyung Kim

19 POSTS
Dr. Ju Hyung Kim currently serves as a President at the Security Management Institute, a defense think tank affiliated with the South Korean National Assembly. He has been involved in numerous defense projects and has provided consultation to several key organizations, including the Republic of Korea Joint Chiefs of Staff, the Defense Acquisition Program Administration, the Ministry of National Defense, the Korea Institute for Defense Analysis, the Agency for Defense Development, and the Korea Research Institute for Defense Technology Planning and Advancement. He holds a doctoral degree in international relations from the National Graduate Institute for Policy Studies (GRIPS) in Japan, a master’s degree in conflict management from the Johns Hopkins University School of Advanced International Studies (SAIS), and a degree in public policy from Seoul National University’s Graduate School of Public Administration (GSPA).

Exclusive articles:

Beyond the US Alliance: Why Japan and Canada Are South Korea’s Top Security Partners

In an era of overlapping crises, South Korea’s security environment is no longer defined by either a single enemy or a theater. Instead, it...

Strategic Autonomy or Partnership? Europe’s Choice with South Korea

Europe’s ongoing rearmament has exposed a structural contradiction that exists at the very heart of its defense industrial strategy. Despite the surge of demand...

How the Middle East Can Build Its Own Concert System After Iran’s 2026 Strike

The large-scale Iranian missile and drone attacks across the Middle East in March 2026 could be an inflection point. Although the immediate military outcome...

Why the Middle East Needs a Three-Axis Deterrence System Amid Iran’s Evolving Threat

The recent wave of Iranian missile and drone attacks across the Middle East has revealed the vulnerabilities of the region’s security structure. Many of...

Canada and the Golden Dome Debate: Why Lessons from Europe and South Korea Matter Now

For much of the post–Cold War era, missile defense remained a marginal issue in Canada’s strategic discussion. Ottawa’s decision not to participate in US-led...

Canada and South Korea’s Long Game: A Middle-Power Strategy for Two Regions

For much of the past decade, security cooperation between Canada and South Korea has been treated as a peripheral matter. Yet, such an assumption...

The Acheson Line Revisited: How Strategic Silence Could Invite Miscalculation on the Korean Peninsula

In January 1950, US Secretary of State Dean Acheson suggested the US’ defense perimeters in the Pacific, conspicuously leaving South Korea outside it. Apart...

Strategic Lessons from Kennedy-Macmillan for Japan-South Korea Ties

Periods of structural instability tend to expose the difference between formal alliances and functional strategic partnerships. In the early 1960s, at the height of...

Can a Helsinki Process Be Recreated in the Far East?

The problem the Far East is facing nowadays is not the absence of conversation. The key issue is the absence of a durable security...

From Sinai to Seoul: What the Six-Day War Teaches About a Future North Korean Blitzkrieg

In June 1967, when the sun was rising over the Eastern Mediterranean Sea, Israeli fighter squadrons skimming through the coastlines at low altitude struck...

Latest

The Trump–Xi Summit and the Decline of American Crisis Management

The upcoming meeting between Donald Trump and Xi Jinping...

Financial Brief: A Weekly Roundup on the Geopolitics of Money | May 12

EXECUTIVE TAKEAWAYS Inflation resurging. U.S. CPI expected to rise 0.6%...

From Landslide to Crisis: Keir Starmer Battles to Stay in Power

Keir Starmer was seen as a leader who would...

Who Are Britain’s “Bond Vigilantes” and Why Do They Matter?

Britain's long-term government borrowing costs have risen to their...
spot_imgspot_img