The European Commission is considering delaying the European Union’s landmark methane emissions rules for oil and gas imports as governments warn that the regulations could put further pressure on energy supplies.
The push for a postponement has come from France, the United States and several EU member states, which argue that energy security concerns have become more urgent as conflicts in the Middle East disrupt global oil and gas markets.
What the EU Methane Law Requires
The EU’s methane regulation is the world’s first legislation targeting methane emissions from imported fossil fuels.
The rules are due to take effect in January 2027, requiring foreign oil and gas producers supplying the European market to monitor and report their methane emissions. Companies that fail to comply could face fines of up to 20% of their annual turnover.
Stay ahead of the geopolitical week.
MD Briefing delivers expert analysis across five global fronts — the Indo-Pacific, energy, geoeconomics, European security, and the Middle East — every Monday morning. Free.
The legislation was also designed to introduce a methane emissions limit for imported oil and gas from 2030.
The rules are intended to force greater transparency across international energy supply chains and encourage producers to reduce methane leaks from extraction and transportation.
Why Methane Has Become a Climate Priority
Methane is the second largest contributor to climate change after carbon dioxide and has a much greater heat trapping effect than CO2, although it remains in the atmosphere for a shorter period.
That means reducing methane emissions can produce relatively rapid climate benefits compared with some other forms of greenhouse gas reduction.
China, the United States and India are among the world’s largest methane emitters, although their main sources differ. Coal mining is a major source of methane emissions in China, while oil and gas production is the largest source in the United States. In India, livestock and rice cultivation account for a significant share.
In the oil and gas sector, methane can escape through leaks at wells, pipelines and other infrastructure. Countries including Canada, Norway and Nigeria already have rules aimed at reducing methane leaks from domestic production.
Why Europe Is Considering a Delay
The European Commission’s move comes after French President Emmanuel Macron called for a one year postponement, arguing that the rules could create legal risks for importers at a time when energy supplies are already under pressure.
The methane policy has faced growing opposition from energy companies and several European governments as the conflict involving Iran has disrupted global oil and gas supplies.
More than a dozen EU countries, including Germany, Europe’s largest gas market, called in June for the rules to be delayed or suspended. Italy and the Czech Republic have pushed for a three year postponement.
Brussels attempted to ease concerns in July by saying countries should waive fines for companies that breach the rules. That measure, however, did little to stop calls for a delay.
The United States, which has become Europe’s largest supplier of liquefied natural gas, also warned in June that the methane rules could disrupt fuel supplies. Energy companies including ExxonMobil have raised similar concerns.
Those opposing the current timetable argue that some suppliers are not prepared to meet the requirements and could avoid sending LNG cargoes to Europe rather than risk fines or legal disputes.
Europe’s Energy Security Problem
Supporters of a delay say postponing the rules would give importers more time to prepare while preventing additional pressure on European energy supplies during the Middle East conflict.
Italian utility Edison has said it expects to receive no LNG cargoes from QatarEnergy until December 2026 because of the war involving Iran.
European gas storage levels are also significantly lower than usual for this time of year, with high prices linked in part to disruptions around the Strait of Hormuz, a critical energy route through which a large share of the world’s oil and LNG has historically passed.
For European governments, the immediate concern is whether stricter import requirements could discourage suppliers from sending fuel to the continent when alternative supplies are already under pressure.
What a Delay Could Mean for Energy Companies
Moving the start date to January 2028 would give importers more time to negotiate gas supply contracts without the immediate risk of violating the methane rules.
It would also give companies additional time to establish monitoring systems and have their emissions verified by approved bodies.
Some EU officials have acknowledged that it is difficult to determine how much the methane rules are already affecting oil and gas contracts because the details of many supply agreements are not publicly available.
A Wood Mackenzie study published in March and backed by the oil and gas industry estimated that nearly half of the EU’s gas imports could face difficulties complying with the rules.
Environmental research has produced a different assessment. A June study by Rystad for the Environmental Defense Fund found that sufficient gas volumes were available to meet the EU’s methane monitoring requirements, although suppliers would still need to complete the required verification process.
The Climate Versus Energy Security Debate
The dispute highlights a broader challenge for Europe as it tries to tighten climate rules while maintaining reliable energy supplies.
A delay could reduce immediate compliance pressure on energy companies and give importers more time to prepare. At the same time, environmental groups have argued that the availability of compliant gas means the rules do not necessarily threaten Europe’s energy security.
The debate therefore centers not only on methane reduction but also on whether Europe can enforce tougher environmental standards without limiting access to fuel during periods of geopolitical disruption.
What Happens Next
The European Commission has not confirmed when it will formally propose changes to the methane law, although EU officials have indicated that a proposal could come as early as this week.
Any changes would then have to be negotiated and approved by EU member states and the European Parliament before taking effect.
The outcome will determine whether Europe keeps its original timetable for regulating methane emissions from imported fossil fuels or gives energy companies additional time as the region faces continuing pressure over energy security.
With information from Reuters.
