Sudan’s Struggle with Economic Development from Natural Resources

Sudan is rich in natural resources, including oil, gold, copper, iron ore, and natural gas, all of which have the potential to generate substantial income for the country.

Sudan, a country with immense natural resource wealth, has faced long-standing struggles in utilizing its economic potential due to a combination of geographical challenges, political instability, corruption, and ineffective policies. Despite vast reserves of oil, gold, and other minerals, Sudan has been unable to achieve significant or sustainable economic development. This article explores the ways in which Sudan’s geographical landscape, corruption, and governance policies have impeded its capacity to transform its natural resources into long-term economic growth.

Natural Resource Wealth in Sudan

Sudan is rich in natural resources, including oil, gold, copper, iron ore, and natural gas, all of which have the potential to generate substantial income for the country. Before the secession of South Sudan in 2011, Sudan was a significant producer of oil, with the petroleum industry accounting for nearly 60% of the government’s revenue (Elgaili, 2014). Even after the loss of oil-rich South Sudan, Sudan retained substantial gold deposits, which have become a central component of its extractive economy.

In addition to minerals, Sudan possesses vast tracts of arable land and water resources, which could support large-scale agricultural development (Ahmed, 2016). Yet, despite this wealth, Sudan’s ability to process and export its natural resources remains limited, largely due to geographical constraints, coupled with systemic corruption and weak governance.

Geographical Constraints

Sudan’s geographical landscape presents significant barriers to the efficient extraction, processing, and transportation of its natural resources. The country’s vast and often hostile terrain, ranging from deserts to swamps, complicates infrastructure development and resource exploitation (International Crisis Group, 2020).

1. Desertification and Harsh Climates

Sudan’s northern regions are characterized by desert and semi-desert landscapes, part of the larger Sahara Desert. These areas suffer from extreme temperatures, aridity, and desertification, all of which hinder efforts to build infrastructure necessary for the extraction and transportation of resources. For example, many mineral-rich areas, such as those containing gold and iron ore, are located in regions with poor road networks, making it difficult to access and transport mined materials (Bashir, 2018).

The intense heat and lack of water in these regions not only make mining operations more expensive but also pose risks to worker health and safety. Furthermore, desertification has steadily encroached upon more fertile lands, further exacerbating the challenge of developing Sudan’s agricultural potential (Fadlalla & Hassan, 2019).

2. Floodplains and Seasonal Rivers

In contrast to its deserts, Sudan also has extensive floodplains, especially in its southern and central regions. The Nile River, which traverses the country, offers both opportunities and challenges. While the river provides vital water resources and the potential for hydroelectric power, seasonal flooding disrupts transportation and infrastructure, leading to significant losses of economic productivity (UNEP, 2017).

Moreover, the lack of proper flood control measures in many areas results in frequent destruction of roads, railways, and bridges, hampering efforts to efficiently transport resources from remote areas to urban centers or ports for export. For example, much of Sudan’s mineral wealth is located far from Khartoum and Port Sudan, the country’s key commercial and export hubs, making it difficult to move extracted resources for processing and sale.

3. Landlocked and Inaccessible Regions

Sudan’s geography also places it at a disadvantage due to its large landmass and relatively limited coastline. While Port Sudan provides some access to the Red Sea, many of the country’s resource-rich regions are located inland, far from major transportation routes. Without significant investment in road and rail infrastructure, much of Sudan’s natural resource wealth remains underutilized.

For instance, the oil fields of West Kordofan and the gold mines of Darfur are located in remote regions with poor infrastructure. These areas not only suffer from logistical challenges but also from ongoing conflicts, which further impede development efforts (Verhoeven, 2015).

The Role of Corruption in Undermining Economic Development

While geography plays a significant role in Sudan’s development challenges, corruption and political instability have exacerbated the country’s inability to fully harness its natural resources. Sudan has long been plagued by systemic corruption at all levels of government, and this has severely hampered efforts to promote transparency and accountability in the extractive industries.

1. Corruption in the Oil Industry

During the years when oil dominated Sudan’s economy, revenues from the oil sector were largely controlled by the central government, and much of the wealth generated never reached local communities or contributed to broader national development. According to Transparency International, much of the revenue from oil was siphoned off by elites within the ruling National Congress Party (NCP), leaving little to be invested in infrastructure or social services (Elgaili, 2014).

The concentration of wealth in the hands of the few not only led to widespread dissatisfaction among marginalized groups but also fueled ongoing conflicts in regions such as Darfur and South Kordofan, where local populations saw little benefit from the country’s natural resource wealth (Verhoeven, 2015). The lack of transparency in the oil industry also created an environment ripe for mismanagement and embezzlement, further undermining the sector’s ability to drive economic growth.

2. Corruption in the Gold Sector

Since the loss of oil revenues following the secession of South Sudan, Sudan’s government has turned to gold as a major source of income. However, the gold sector is also riddled with corruption. Large portions of the country’s gold production take place outside of formal channels, with much of it being smuggled out of the country by armed groups and corrupt officials (Hassan, 2019).

The informal nature of much of the gold sector has deprived the government of significant revenues, while also fueling conflict and violence in mining areas. In Darfur and South Kordofan, for example, armed groups and militias have taken control of many gold mines, using the profits to finance their activities (International Crisis Group, 2020). The lack of effective regulation and oversight in the sector has also led to environmental degradation, as artisanal miners use toxic chemicals such as mercury to extract gold, contaminating water supplies and further threatening livelihoods.

Policy Failures and Lack of Infrastructure

In addition to corruption, Sudan’s economic development has been hindered by policy failures, particularly in relation to infrastructure development and governance in the extractive industries.

1. Inadequate Infrastructure Investment

One of the most significant barriers to resource-based economic development in Sudan is the lack of infrastructure investment. The country’s roads, railways, and ports are all underdeveloped, making it difficult to transport goods to markets or export resources. For example, Sudan’s rail network, once among the largest in Africa, has deteriorated significantly due to years of neglect and lack of maintenance (Verhoeven, 2015).

Similarly, the country’s power generation capacity is limited, which has constrained the development of industries such as mining and manufacturing. Although Sudan has significant hydroelectric potential, particularly along the Nile, political instability and poor planning have prevented the country from fully capitalizing on this resource (UNEP, 2017).

The lack of investment in infrastructure has also limited opportunities for foreign direct investment (FDI), as investors are deterred by the high costs and risks associated with doing business in a country with such poor transportation and communication networks.

2. Policy Instability and Economic Sanctions

In addition to infrastructure challenges, Sudan has also faced policy instability, particularly in relation to economic governance. The country’s long-standing political instability, coupled with international sanctions, has made it difficult for Sudan to attract the foreign investment and expertise needed to develop its natural resources.

For much of the past two decades, Sudan has been subject to economic sanctions imposed by the United States and other Western countries, primarily due to its support for terrorist organizations and human rights abuses in Darfur (Ahmed, 2016). These sanctions have severely restricted Sudan’s access to international markets and financing, further hampering its ability to develop its natural resource sectors.

While some sanctions were lifted in recent years, the country continues to face significant challenges in terms of rebuilding investor confidence. Moreover, the absence of coherent and stable economic policies has made it difficult for the private sector to play a meaningful role in driving development. Frequent changes in taxation, currency devaluation, and the absence of a clear regulatory framework for industries such as mining have further discouraged investment (Elgaili, 2014).

Conclusion

Sudan’s struggle to achieve sustainable economic development from its natural resources can be attributed to a combination of geographical challenges, corruption, and policy failures. The country’s diverse landscape, ranging from deserts to floodplains, presents significant barriers to infrastructure development and resource extraction. At the same time, systemic corruption and mismanagement in the extractive industries have undermined efforts to harness natural resources for the benefit of the broader population. Additionally, policy instability and the lack of adequate infrastructure have further constrained the country’s ability to attract investment and develop its resource sectors.

Going forward, addressing these challenges will require concerted efforts on multiple fronts. Investment in infrastructure, particularly in transportation and power generation, will be essential for unlocking the potential of Sudan’s natural resources. Similarly, efforts to combat corruption and promote transparency in the extractive industries will be critical for ensuring that the wealth generated from resources is used for the benefit of all Sudanese. Finally, the establishment of stable and coherent economic policies will be crucial for rebuilding investor confidence and promoting long-term economic growth.

Sekarsari Sugihartono
Sekarsari Sugihartono
I am an international relations master's student at Gadjah Mada University. My interests are SDGs and International Trade Dispute.