As the 2024 presidential election looms, America faces a significant dilemma: choosing between two unqualified candidates many believe do not embody the nation’s best potential. Vice President Kamala Harris and former President Donald Trump are the front-runners. Delving deeply into both candidates reveals substantial weaknesses that complicate their qualifications. Kamala Harris is considered the first Black and South Asian female nominated for the highest political position in the United States. However, she arguably lacks political experience, particularly in foreign policy. Thus, this inexperience could be a significant liability in an era of global uncertainty. Since assuming the role of vice president, Harris has struggled to define her role and make a substantial impact on major policy areas. As a vice president, her handling of critical issues, such as the border crisis and diplomatic engagements, has been disappointing. This failure to effectively address such issues adds to the narrative that she may not be prepared for the full responsibilities of the presidency. In addition to that, Harris’s considerable inability to build a solid public profile is another concern. As such, many Americans remain uncertain of her leadership capabilities. The question arises: Can Kamala Harris effectively lead the nation and navigate the complexities of international relations in a time of global instability?
To answer this question, we need to explore the character of Kamala, who is clinging to the presidency, much like Trump, who does not understand the international system and foreign policy laws properly. While historic milestones have marked her political career, it has yet to demonstrate the necessary depth of experience and strategic vision for the presidency. As the world grapples with escalating geopolitical tensions, particularly in the Middle East, economic uncertainties, and a rapidly changing climate, the next president must possess the ability to respond to prevent them. Kamala may need a decade, or perhaps more, to master the art of foreign policy. Therefore, the answer here is hard to interpret, even when considered from another perspective.
Conversely, Trump is a polarizing and controversial figure and may even be a cause for concern. Trump’s management style is erratic and impulsive, leading to unpredictable policy changes that can destabilize both domestic and international arenas. An excellent example is his first tenure, characterized by significant controversy, contentious foreign policies, and an impeachment trial. Additionally, he adopted an unorthodox style and approach in navigating relationships with allies and adversaries and addressing critical global issues. His foreign policy decisions often prioritized short-term gains over long-term stability and alliances. On the same boat, his frequent clashes with the media and political establishments are another significant concern. Such approach and behavior have left divided. Therefore, it cannot be ruled out that Trump will follow the same approach that previously led to the tumultuous and chaotic atmosphere. His return to the White House could further erode democratic norms and institutions.
Although Kamala Harris and Donald Trump are prominent figures in the upcoming election, their candidacies bring to light significant issues regarding experience, divisiveness, and the need for new leadership. As such, arguably, looking deeply into American political history, the current scenario underscores that America’s democratic process is at a critical juncture. Voter dissatisfaction with the top candidates signals a broader need for systemic change within the political arena. However, although the timing of upcoming American elections is imminent, the Democratic and Republican parties still need to nurture a new generation of leaders who embody integrity, competence, and a genuine commitment to public service for the next decade, regardless of which candidate wins. Additionally, both parties must engage in introspection and reform to restore trust with the American public. The growth of extreme partisanship and the erosion of civil discourse have obstructed effective policymaking. The route to a healthier democracy lies in collaboration, transparency, and a renewed commitment to the common good. Realizing this vision requires political will and active engagement from citizens who demand accountability and ethical behavior from their representatives. In sum, America stands at a crossroads, and the decisions made in the coming years will determine the nation’s trajectory for a decade. It is possible to overcome the nation’s challenges with sustained effort and dedication. Thus, both parties must step up, offering candidates in the future who can lead and inspire confidence in American citizens. The future of American democracy hinges on embracing these ideals, guaranteeing the nation thrives through collective effort and principled leadership. Only then will the U.S. be able to reach its full potential as it befits its reputation as a superpower.
