South Africa and Rwanda Drop from Duty-free Trade Access to United States

South Africa and Rwanda, effective from January 1, 2027, will no longer benefit from the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA).

South Africa and Rwanda, effective from January 1, 2027, will no longer benefit from the African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA), which allows duty-free trade and exports to the United States, weakening the bilateral trade and their high-valued economic partnerships. The AGOA extension is expected to reinforce Africa–US trade continuity by preserving duty-free access for eligible African exports amid shifting global trade dynamics. Often commonly known as AGOA, it maintains duty-free access for thousands of African products entering the United States. Data from institutions such as the United States Department of Commerce and the United Nations indicate that AGOA-supported exports have supported millions of jobs across the continent. It has also offered African states to generate revenue for their budget.

US Trade Representative Jamieson Greer said in early November that both countries had failed to meet AGOA’s eligibility criteria. South Africa has been the largest beneficiary of the program, exporting about $1.7bn worth of goods to the United States under AGOA in 2025. “President Trump found that the governments of Rwanda and South Africa are engaging in practices that are inconsistent with AGOA’s eligibility criteria,” Greer said in a statement.

According to State Department reports, AGOA beneficiaries are expected to meet eligibility requirements covering progress towards market-based economies, good governance, and the elimination of barriers to United States trade and investment, with Washington reviewing their eligibility annually. Washington highlighted trade barriers, rule of law, and human rights as issues it is deeply concerned about in Rwanda, which was also suspended in 2018. With regard to South Africa, Washington said it was concerned by barriers to US trade and investment, corruption, and threats to United States national security and foreign policy interests.

With the heightening of the geopolitical situation, there have been growing tensions between the United States and a number of African states, including South Africa. South Africa was denied a seat at the G20. President Donald Trump’s administration has cracked down on South Africa for what Trump says is its persecution of white people. South Africa’s government says this is a falsehood spread by fringe groups. The United States has also taken issue with South Africa’s foreign policy, in particular the genocide case it brought against Israel at the International Court of Justice. Israel denies genocide allegations.

Stay ahead of the geopolitical week.

MD Briefing delivers expert analysis across five global fronts — the Indo-Pacific, energy, geoeconomics, European security, and the Middle East — every Monday morning. Free.

South Africa’s Department of Trade, Industry and Competition said late October it was prepared for a negative outcome from the AGOA eligibility review and that it remained open to dialogue with the United States. Exports under AGOA make up only about 10 percent of the country’s total exports to the United States and 1 percent of its total global exports, it noted.

South African President Cyril Ramaphosa has also said in recent weeks that his country must prepare for being cut out of the program and that it was already seeking new markets and signing new trade deals with other partners such as China. South Africa’s main exports to the US include precious stones and metals, motor vehicles, and iron and steel. Its exports under AGOA are mainly motor vehicles and parts, as well as farm products and wine. Rwanda’s main exports to the United States include coffee, tea, and minerals.

Key Features and Benefits of AGOA

It’s worth reiterating here that during these past several years, AGOA has been the cornerstone of US economic engagement with the countries of sub-Saharan Africa. In this case, as AGOA is closely working with the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA) Secretariat and with the African Union (AU), trade professionals could primarily leverage various economic sectors and unwaveringly act as bridges between the United States and Africa.

* Duty-free Access: AGOA allows eligible products from sub-Saharan African countries to enter the US market without paying tariffs.

* Promotion of Economic Growth: The program encourages economic growth by providing incentives for African countries to open their economies and build free markets.

* Encouraging Economic Reforms: AGOA encourages economic and political reforms in eligible countries, including the rule of law and market-oriented policies.

* Increased Trade and Investment: The program aims to strengthen trade and investment ties between the United States and sub-Saharan Africa.

With the changing times, Africa is also building its muscles towards a new direction since the introduction of the African Continental Free Trade Area (AfCFTA), which was officially launched in July 2019. 

In practical terms, trading under the AfCFTA commenced in January 2021. And the United States has prioritized the AfCFTA as one mechanism through which to strengthen its long-term relations with the continent. In the context of the crucial geopolitical changes, African leaders, corporate executives, and the entire business community are optimistic about the extension of AGOA for mutually beneficial trade partnerships with the United States.

It is worthy to say that AGOA, to a considerable degree, as a significant trade policy, has played a crucial role in promoting economic growth and development in sub-Saharan Africa. 

Observations and Interpretations

In media comments, Gustavo de Carvalho, Programme Head (Acting): African Governance and Diplomacy, South African Institute of International Affairs (SAIIA), states that China is generally associated with positive economic influence, the United States retains the strongest pull as a development model, and Russia, despite a louder political profile, registers a smaller and more geographically concentrated footprint. Multipolarity is not a destination for Africa. It is a working environment that creates more options and more risks at the same. Competition is real and intensifying, a noticeable scramble for the continent’s resources. African leaders are exploring several alternatives within the context of their national development, including the EU, Turkey, Japan, India, the United States, South Korea, Saudi Arabia, and the UAE.

Describing the continent as a chessboard, however, understates how African states themselves are shaping these dynamics, sometimes through skilful diversification and sometimes through security bargains that entail longer-term costs. The Sahel, for instance, illustrates the latter starkly. Long-term development depends on African leaders financing more of their own security and development priorities. Genuine African agency requires more than geopolitical rhetoric and symbolism. From the United States, leaders look for market access through instruments such as AGOA, and the priority across the relationships must essentially be explicit transparency in the terms of agreements with potential foreign players.

Future Perspectives

The outlook beyond the extension of AGOA is, seemingly, uncertain. The AGOA framework is increasingly functioning as one pillar within a diversified external trade strategy. Although United States market access remains valuable, African economies are balancing it alongside South–South trade and intra-African commerce under the African Continental Free Trade Area. Looking ahead, the AGOA extension places renewed focus on longer-term renewal discussions and reform debates. Policymakers are expected to engage more actively with United States counterparts to clarify eligibility conditions.

The duty-free access for nearly 40 African countries has boosted development and fostered more equitable and sustainable growth in Africa. By design, AGOA is a useful mechanism for improving accessibility to trade competitiveness, connectivity, and productivity. During these past 25 years, AGOA has been the cornerstone of US economic engagement with the countries of sub-Saharan Africa.

South Africa’s and Rwanda’s cases highlight how trade policy is becoming entangled with broader diplomatic tensions, casting uncertainty over a key pillar of United States-Africa economic relations. South Africa trade documents show that goods and services trade with other states totaled $26.2 billion in 2024, under the Trade and Investment Framework Agreement (TIFA), as far back as 2012. Without doubts, the AGOA sustains trade momentum and offers Africa valuable breathing space. It preserves access, supports export earnings, and reinforces Africa’s role in global trade, especially at this time of emerging multipolarity.

Kester Kenn Klomegah
Kester Kenn Klomegah
MD Africa Editor Kester Kenn Klomegah is an independent researcher and writer on African affairs in the EurAsian region and former Soviet republics. He wrote previously for African Press Agency, African Executive and Inter Press Service. Earlier, he had worked for The Moscow Times, a reputable English newspaper. Klomegah taught part-time at the Moscow Institute of Modern Journalism. He studied international journalism and mass communication, and later spent a year at the Moscow State Institute of International Relations. He co-authored a book “AIDS/HIV and Men: Taking Risk or Taking Responsibility” published by the London-based Panos Institute. In 2004 and again in 2009, he won the Golden Word Prize for a series of analytical articles on Russia's economic cooperation with African countries.