Trump’s New Tariffs on China: Will They Backfire on the U.S.?

As history tends to repeat itself, a pressing question emerges: Will this latest tariff action strengthen America's economic position, or will it backfire?

On February 4, 2025, the United States opened a new chapter in its trade relationship with China by imposing an additional 10% tariff on Chinese imports, which seems to reignite concerns about another “trade war” between the two global economic powerhouses. President Donald Trump justified the move as a direct response to China’s failure to curb fentanyl exports rather than a broader economic strategy. However, this decision has drawn immediate comparisons to the trade war during Trump’s first presidency. As history tends to repeat itself, a pressing question emerges: Will this latest tariff action strengthen America’s economic position, or will it backfire?

Key Sectors Affected

China is one of the U.S.’s main trade partners, with a total value of around $532 billion in traded goods. These trade activities vary across many sectors, ranging from agriculture to manufacturing components. Henceforth, due to its wide relations, tariffs will significantly impact the trade activities between the two nations.

That is why the impact of these tariffs is being felt across various industries, particularly in consumer goods, technology, and agriculture. Consumer electronics companies that rely on Chinese components are facing increased costs. In addition, the fast fashion and retail sectors that depend on China’s low-cost manufacturing may have difficulty finding cheap suppliers, causing them to shift supply chains to alternative regions like Vietnam and Bangladesh.

Furthermore, the toy industry, which is heavily reliant on Chinese production, is also facing supply chain disruptions and higher costs, which could reduce product availability in the U.S. Also, the energy and agriculture sectors feel pressure from China’s tariffs on U.S. energy exports, such as liquefied natural gas, and restricted demand for agricultural products like soybeans and pork.

The Risk of a Renewed Trade War

With both the U.S. and China maintaining firm stances, there is a significant risk of this conflict escalating into a prolonged trade war, again. The Trump administration has shown no indication of deferring the tariffs, reinforcing its hardline stance on trade with China and signaling no immediate plans for de-escalation. Meanwhile, China has expressed a willingness to negotiate, but the U.S. has not actively engaged in diplomatic discussions, increasing the likelihood of further economic retaliation.

One thing to note is that a prolonged trade war could have severe global setbacks, including market instability, slower economic growth, and inflationary pressures worldwide. The longer the economic standoff continues, the more it threatens global economic stability. Countries heavily reliant on trade with the U.S. and China, such as Europe and Latin America, are caught in the crossfire. In addition, the ongoing uncertainty will drive fluctuations in global stock markets, raising concerns over recessionary pressures.

China’s Response

Towards this action, China has swiftly responded to the U.S. tariffs with countermeasures targeting key sectors and companies. Initially, China imposed tariffs on American agricultural products and industrial goods, among the first sectors impacted by previous trade disputes. However, the focus has shifted toward energy products and vehicles, as evidenced by the latest tariffs announced on February 4, 2025. These include additional tariffs of 15% on coal and liquefied natural gas and 10% on crude oil, agricultural machinery, and large vehicles, effective on February 10, 2025.

Furthermore, China has initiated regulatory scrutiny of major U.S. tech firms, such as Google, Nvidia, and Intel, as part of its broader push to curb the influence of American companies operating in China. This includes antitrust investigations that could limit their access to Chinese markets. These measures thus reflect China’s firm “strike-back” to the U.S. tariffs, increasing the tensions between the two countries’ trade activities.

China’s Strategic Pivot: Expanding Trade Partnerships

Henceforth, this situation urges China to actively shift its focus toward strengthening its trade relationships with other countries and economic blocs to reduce its dependence on American trade. In fact, China has been deepening cooperation with BRICS nations, such as Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa, creating alternative trade channels to bolster its influence in global trade. China is also expanding its presence in ASEAN, with increased trade and investment in Indonesia, Vietnam, and Malaysia. This is part of its broader strategy to shift global supply chains away from reliance on the U.S.

Furthermore, the European Union can be one of China’s prominent alternative partners. China has made some strides in strengthening its economic ties with the European Union, such as the EU-China Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI), which aims to offer European companies better access to the Chinese market. However, due to ongoing geopolitical tensions, the CAI has yet to be ratified.

Lastly, China’s Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) continues to gain momentum, furthering its goal of enhancing economic ties with developing nations across Asia, Africa, and Latin America. Hence, by diversifying its partnerships and engaging in such initiatives, China seeks to establish a multipolar trading environment to reduce its volatility in trading activities with the U.S.

Implications for the U.S. Economy

Trump’s tariffs policy doesn’t come without potential backfire for the U.S. Hence, the U.S. must carefully assess the long-term consequences of its aggressive trade measures and explore alternative strategies to mitigate potential economic risks.

This is because the risks associated with higher tariffs are significant. Tariffs lead to higher import costs, which businesses often pass on to consumers, raising the prices of essential goods such as electronics and clothing. American businesses, particularly in agriculture and energy, may face decreased demand due to Chinese retaliatory measures, while U.S. tech firms may encounter regulatory challenges that limit their global expansion. Moreover, as China strengthens its ties with other trade partners, the U.S. risks losing economic leverage in key regions, potentially diminishing its long-term influence in global trade.

Another concern is the impact on American manufacturing. While tariffs are often framed as a way to bring jobs back to the U.S., the increased costs of raw materials and production could lead to factory closures and layoffs, offsetting potential gains. The Federal Reserve may also be forced to adjust monetary policy in response to inflationary pressures from higher import costs, potentially increasing interest rates and slowing economic growth. Additionally, retaliatory measures from China could extend beyond tariffs, including restrictions on American businesses operating in China and reduced investment in U.S. assets.

What To Lookup

To close this article, it is important to realize that the escalating trade tensions between the U.S. and China underscore the fragile nature of international economic relations. Imposing tariffs and retaliatory measures has heightened uncertainty in global markets, significantly affecting international trade dynamics. As both nations pursue policies to protect their economic interests, the long-term consequences of these trade measures could lead to profound shifts in global commerce, potentially reshaping global supply chains and economic alliances.

The consequences could be severe if the U.S. continues its aggressive tariff policies without a comprehensive plan to mitigate the economic fallout. Hence, policymakers must balance short-term trade objectives with long-term economic sustainability. Without a well-calibrated approach, the risk of significant economic disruptions remains high.

Lastly, a reiteration of diplomatic engagement will be crucial in preventing further escalation. Without active negotiation efforts, both the U.S. and China, and, by extension, the global economy, could face ongoing instability. Henceforth, navigating these shifts will require economic foresight, strategic diplomacy, and a willingness to adapt to an increasingly multipolar global trade environment. So, it is important to underscore that maintaining the U.S. role as a leading economic force will depend on a nuanced, adaptable approach that fosters stability and positions the nation for success in a more diversified world economy.

Bintang Corvi Diphda
Bintang Corvi Diphda
Bintang Corvi is an undergraduate student in the Department of International Relations, Brawijaya University, Indonesia.