Terrorism in Afghanistan: A Growing Catalyst for Regional Instability

A United Nations study naming Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) as the largest terrorist group operating in Afghanistan highlights the hazardous escalation of regional instability emerging from Afghanistan.

A United Nations study naming Tehrik-i-Taliban Pakistan (TTP) as the largest terrorist group operating in Afghanistan highlights the hazardous escalation of regional instability emerging from Afghanistan. The findings show that the TTP, which has significant backing from the Afghan Taliban and connections to Al-Qaeda, is not just an increasing threat to Pakistan, but also a sign of greater destabilisation in South and Central Asia. This development necessitates immediate international attention and a thorough reevaluation of counterterrorism efforts to confront the increasing issue as well as the persistent threat of Islamic State-Khorasan Province (ISKP).

The TTP: A Persistent Threat Beyond Pakistan

The TTP, sometimes known as the Pakistani Taliban, has been a potent rebel force since its inception in 2007. Initially aimed at undermining the Pakistani state, the TTP has constantly exploited the dangerous and mostly ungoverned tribal areas along the Pakistan-Afghan border. These districts have long been a breeding ground for militancy, with the TTP orchestrating several assaults on Pakistani security personnel and civilians. According to the UN study, the TTP has risen in strength, with between 6,000 and 6,500 militants, making it a formidable force capable of prolonged operations.

The TTP’s revival has been characterised by a rapid increase in assaults, which have risen from 573 in 2021 to almost 1,200 by 2023, with no indications of abating. This escalation is primarily due to the group’s increased operational capabilities, which are strengthened by the Taliban’s return to power in Afghanistan in 2021. The Taliban’s involvement in providing safe havens, logistical assistance, and material help to the TTP has contributed significantly to the group’s newfound strength. This cooperation has not only encouraged the TTP, but it has also weakened Pakistan’s already shaky ties with Afghanistan, threatening to destabilise the entire region.

Taliban’s Complicity and Its Broader Implications

The UN study makes it apparent that the Taliban’s support for the TTP is purposeful and planned. The Taliban and the TTP have a long history of common ideological and operational aims, which has led to a mutually advantageous alliance. The Taliban regime’s failure to designate the TTP as a terrorist organisation, along with its supply of safe passage and resources, suggests implicit permission for the TTP’s cross-border actions.

The alliance between the Taliban and the TTP has significant consequences for regional security. The TTP’s use of Afghan territory to launch strikes into Pakistan has not only heightened tensions between Islamabad and Kabul but also posed a huge threat to the whole region. The TTP’s ability to form stronger relationships with other extremist organisations, such as the Islamic State Khorasan Province (ISKP), increases the prospect of a broader and more coordinated terrorist network that might destabilise South and Central Asia.

ISKP: A Growing Menace in the Region

The ISKP, an offshoot of the Islamic State (ISIS), has developed as a serious terrorist organisation in South Asia, affecting the region’s security situation. Since its inception in 2015, the ISKP has emerged as one of the most violent and extremist sections in the global jihadist movement, carrying out several high-profile assaults in Afghanistan and Pakistan. The group’s radical ideology, which is consistent with ISIS’s overall objective of creating a caliphate via bloodshed and terror, poses a direct danger to regional and global security.

The ISKP’s influence has expanded as a result of political instability, bad governance, and civil unrest in Afghanistan and surrounding territories. The group has proved its durability and flexibility by taking advantage of the unstable situation left behind by the United States’ withdrawal from Afghanistan and the Taliban’s control. This permissive atmosphere has enabled the ISKP to grow its activities and recruiting efforts, establishing it as a major role in the region’s militant scene.

The group’s actions, such as the deadly assault on Kabul airport in August 2021 and the bombing of a maternity facility in Kabul in May 2020, demonstrate its potential for large-scale brutality. The international world is increasingly concerned about the ISKP’s potential to inspire and organise attacks beyond Afghanistan’s borders, notably in Europe and South Asia.

The Regional Fallout: A Ticking Time Bomb

TTP and ISKP offer a rising threat that affects the whole region, not just Afghanistan and Pakistan. For example, the ISKP’s objectives go beyond South Asia, as indicated by the group’s strikes in Russia and its expanding reach into Europe and other areas. The assault in Moscow, which killed over 150 people, is a sobering reminder of the group’s growing skills and capacity to carry out worldwide strikes. This tragedy shows the critical necessity for a concerted international response against ISKP and its affiliates’ rising danger.

In addition, Afghanistan’s turmoil risks creating a vacuum that other extremist organisations might exploit, further destabilising the area. Iran, Central Asian countries, and perhaps China may become more exposed to the Afghan conflict’s spillover consequences. The rising power of terrorist networks in Afghanistan may result in more cross-border terrorism, arms smuggling, and the propagation of extreme ideas, posing a direct danger to regional and global security.

The Need for a Coordinated International Response

Given the TTP and ISKP’s rising threat, the international community must respond decisively. This involves reconsidering counterterrorism measures and fostering more collaboration among regional and global forces. The current scenario in Afghanistan underlines the limitations of unilateral methods of counterterrorism and emphasises the necessity for an international response.

Key regional powers, including Pakistan, Iran, Russia, and China, must collaborate to counter the rising threat of terrorism from Afghanistan. This collaboration should go beyond military operations and include information sharing, economic assistance, and attempts to address the underlying causes of extremism, such as poverty, corruption, and political disenfranchisement.

Furthermore, the international community must hold the Taliban accountable for its backing of terrorist groups such as the TTP. This means putting diplomatic pressure on the Taliban leadership to cut relations with these organisations and take significant steps to keep Afghanistan from becoming a haven for terrorists. Failure to do so risks enabling the situation to spiral out of control, perhaps having disastrous ramifications for regional and global security.

Conclusion

The UN report’s results serve as a harsh reminder of the urgent need to handle Afghanistan’s escalating terrorist threat. The TTP’s rebirth, together with the growing influence of the ISKP, poses a severe threat to regional peace and security. The international community must respond quickly and firmly to this menace, acknowledging that the stability of South and Central Asia, and indeed the whole globe, is at stake. Only by joint measures can we expect to reduce the rising threat of terrorism and assure the region’s future stability and security.

Waleed Sami
Waleed Sami
Waleed Sami is a postgraduate student of Strategic Studies from the Centre for International Peace and Stability (CIPS), a prestigious school of the National University of Science and Technology (NUST), Islamabad. Waleed has completed his bachelor's from the National Defence University Islamabad (NDU) in International Relations. Waleed is also a research intern at the Institute of Strategic Studies Islamabad (ISSI) and served as a junior researcher at the South Asia Strategic Stability Institute (SASSI) and a research intern at the Institute of Policy Studies (IPS).