Funding the Future: How MDB Reform Paves the Way for SDG Progress

As the pendulum of time swings inexorably forward, the urgent call for making the global financial architecture reverberates louder than ever. With the OECD projecting a staggering $3.9 trillion chasm to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, the pressure mounts for decisive action.

The international financial architecture is outdated and is failing humanity. From egregious borrowing costs for developing countries to underinvestment in global crises like climate change and pandemics, the system is rife with inefficiencies and biases. In order to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), substantial reforms within the multilateral financial system and the Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) in particular, are urgently needed.

After the adoption of the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in 2015, the World Bank acknowledged that achieving the ambitious vision of the SDGs would necessitate significantly higher resource levels to succeed. However, this aspiration went unrealized. MDB net flows averaged $25 billion in constant 2012 dollars between 2013 and 2015, and spiked to $41 billion in 2021. This upsurge was prompted by the cyclical reaction to the COVID-19 pandemic instead of being a response to the essential building blocks needed to establish the SDG economy. With only 6 years left to achieve the Agenda 2030, the prospects for the future fulfillment of the UN’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) appears grim.

The global efforts to meet these ambitious objectives by 2030 faced setbacks amid a unique confluence of conflicts, rising nationalist sentiments, and the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. The Global Sustainable Development Report 2023 underscored that only around 12% of the SDG targets were progressing as intended, while approximately 30% had shown limited progress or even regressed below 2015 levels. The staggering financial gap required to achieve the SDGs, estimated by the OECD at $3.9 trillion in 2020, cast a shadow over these goals. This shortfall magnified during the pandemic, as economic downturns and urgent health expenditures diverted resources from sustainable development initiatives.

Merely a fraction—less than 1%—of global financial resources could address this funding deficit. The overwhelming sentiment stemming from the SDG Summit 2023, fortified by the adoption of the Political Declaration by national leaders, suggests enduring backing for the SDGs. However, to effectively execute a recovery plan, vital overhauls within the multilateral fiscal framework, notably the Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs), are imperative.

Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) have traditionally held a crucial position in funding and assisting development projects worldwide. Their substantial financial aid and expert guidance are essential for tackling a broad spectrum of challenges, spanning from governance enhancements for better public service provision to the implementation of infrastructure projects. And while MDBs have historically been significant players in supporting global development projects, their existing frameworks and approaches hinder advancements toward achieving the SDGs. The distribution of MDB resources often does not align with SDG priorities, particularly with regards to harmonizing goals.

MDB procedures are just a component of a broader financial infrastructure that includes tax systems, economic asset assessment, credit ratings, and country-to-country loans. At the Summit, UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres declared that the current International Financial Architecture is outdated and inadequate for current requirements. “The pandemic has underscored once again how the global financial architecture is outdated, dysfunctional and unjust,” Guterres said, stressing on the need for multilateralism.

Debts, for instance, can impede the influx of funds into crucial SDG areas like education and healthcare, especially in Global South nations, where debt payments are notably higher compared to more industrialized counterparts. African nations typically borrow at rates that are four times greater than those of the United States and eight times higher than those of Germany. Approximately half of the world’s countries allocate a larger portion of their budget towards servicing debt payments rather than investing in crucial sectors like healthcare and education.

The MDBs have the opportunity to lead and champion a fresh narrative of growth for the 21st century. This narrative revolves around fostering innovation, investing in eco-friendly technologies, and building adaptability and resilience against the swift pace of climate change. Harnessing the potential of affordable energy sources, in particular, can spur economic development, providing easier access to reliable electricity for the 775 million individuals currently deprived of it.

MDBs hold a pivotal position in ensuring the availability and cost-effectiveness of the required financial resources. Private investments have the potential to cover the majority of the $1 trillion in external financing necessary by 2030. Nonetheless, due to current challenges such as heavy debt burdens and escalating interest rates in the capital markets, private funds have been hesitant to flow into developing nations. Collaborating with and mitigating risks for the private sector, MDBs can establish a fresh avenue for private capital inflow.

Accelerating advancements in addressing sovereign debt distress in low-income and  developing economies necessitates advancements in the G20’s Common Framework designed in 2020. A crucial shift in resource allocation is imperative.

MDBs need to recalibrate their investment portfolios to emphasize minimizing risks for initiatives that directly contribute to achieving the SDG objectives. Focus should be placed on projects that diminish inequalities, ensure environment protection, and bolster socio-economic stability. This transformative adjustment entails revisiting current projects and committing to initiatives that truly serve the global common good.

When implementing these strategies, Multilateral Development Banks need to embrace the all-encompassing nature of the SDGs and the positive ripple effects that stem from collaborative efforts. They must cater to all clients, assisting both low-income and middle-income nations alike. Pursuing a holistic approach to sustainable development is vital, integrating facets such as economic advancement, human capacity enhancement, gender equality, urbanization, environmental conservation, and biodiversity protection into one comprehensive framework.

As ambitious as it may sound, reforms of the MDBs won’t be seamless. While significant rhetoric emerges from key players during the United Nations General Assembly, strategic lending dynamics revealing rivalry between the US and Europe versus China often prevail. This power struggle could lead major stakeholders to retain their board influence and perpetuate misaligned operational agendas on the field.

In the past five decades, Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) have cemented their role as major development financiers in the global financial structure, thereby making them indispensable for the achievement of the SDGs. MDBs don’t offer a panacea, but they hold a crucial role in making the SDGs a reality. By executing comprehensive reforms that redistribute resources and promote inclusive decision-making processes, Multilateral Development Banks have the potential to transform into impactful agents of change.

Rameen Siddiqui
Rameen Siddiqui
A thought leader and youth activist with main focus areas being Sustainable Development, Political Economy, Development Justice and Advocacy. A member of the United Nations Major Group for Children and Youth (MGCY). Also a Youth Member of United Nations Association of Pakistan (UNAP).