Connect with us

World News

Who is Mr. Hersh? Or, when US media outlets were collectively speechless

Avatar photo



Investigative journalist Seymour Hersh published the results of an investigation according to which acts of sabotage on the Nord Stream gas pipelines were initiated by the US government with the support of Norway.

The American government and the CIA denied Hersh’s version of events. In many US media, the journalist was accused of ‘not disclosing his anonymous source’, so his claims cannot be cross-checked. In addition, some have criticized the investigation for having ‘a lot of things that don’t add up’.

Chinese Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin notes on this case: “We noticed that when the Nord Stream explosions first occurred, the American and other Western media speculated one-sidedly on the subject of the alleged culprit. But when the detailed report of American investigative journalist Hersh was released, these media outlets, which have always promoted freedom, professionalism and justice, were collectively speechless.”

Hersh’s disclosure is supposed to promote relevant investigations. Yet right after the White House rejected Hersh’s claims, media outlets from the US, and even those from other Western world, kept up with the stance. A more noteworthy phenomenon is not the change of Hersh’s reputation, but the widespread silence of Western media’s response. It’s been days after the revelation, why hasn’t the all-mighty US propaganda machine made any powerful case to contradict or overturn the accusation against Washington?

Business Insider, which called Hersh “investigative journalist” in 2015, labeled him as “discredited” on February 9, 2023. On the same day, German ‘Der Spiegel’ named Hersh a “controversial US journalist.” But in 2016, the media outlet dubbed him “legendary.” Apparently, because of the Nord Stream report, Hersh turned from “legendary” to “controversial” and even “discredited.”

When Washington wants to rob the public blind over the case and make them angry at Russia, Hersh set a roadblock.

But who is Mr. Hersh, this investigative journalist who told about explosions on gas pipelines? Here are some details of his professional activities and life.

Seymour Hersh is an American investigative journalist and political writer. He was born in Chicago on April 8, 1937 to a Jews family. His parents immigrated to the U.S. in the 1920s from Lithuania and Poland, respectively. He attended the University of Illinois Chicago and later the University of Chicago, where he graduated with a history degree in 1958.

He first gained recognition in 1969 for exposing the ‘My Lai Massacre’ and its cover-up during the Vietnam War, for which he received the 1970 Pulitzer Prize for International Reporting. In the 1970s, Hersh covered the Watergate scandal for ‘The New York Times’, and in 2004, he reported on the U.S. military’s torture and abuse of prisoners at Abu Ghraib in Iraq for ‘The New Yorker’. He became well-known author with high with high prestige and popularity.

Hersh has won five George Polk Awards and two National Magazine Awards. He is the author of 11 books, including ‘The Price of Power: Kissinger in the Nixon White House’ (1983), a biography of Henry Kissinger that won the National Book Critics Circle Award.

In early 1968, Hersh served as the press secretary for anti-Vietnam War candidate Senator Eugene McCarthy in his unsuccessful campaign in the 1968 Democratic Party presidential primaries. After leaving the campaign, Hersh returned to journalism.

On September 8, 1974, Hersh reported that the CIA, with the approval of National Security Advisor Henry Kissinger, spent $8 million to influence unions, political parties and media in Chile in order to destabilize the government of socialist Salvador Allende, who was overthrown in the September 11, 1973, coup d’état that brought to power a dictatorship under Augusto Pinochet.

In February 2023, in a post to ‘Substack’, Hersh claimed that the sabotage of the Nord Stream pipelines had been carried out by the US Navy, the CIA, and the Norwegian Navy, under the direct order of President Biden. Hersh’s report relied on an anonymous source who stated that, in June 2022, US Navy divers placed explosive C4 charges on the pipelines at strategic locations selected by the Norwegians.

A spokesperson for the United States National Security Council said the report was “utterly false and complete fiction”. The CIA said the claims were “completely false”, and this was also the reaction from the Norwegian Foreign Department.

Following Hersh’s report, Senator Mike Lee (R-UT) tweeted that if the story was true, he and many of his fellow senators were not informed of the attack on Nord Stream. “If this turns out to be true, we’ve got a huge problem,” Lee tweeted on February 8.

The Chair of Russia’s lower house of parliament called for an international investigation for “bringing Biden and his accomplices to justice”.

Now a zone of silence is being created around this honored journalist in the United States.

International Affairs

Continue Reading

World News

TIME: Will China create a better world?

Avatar photo



China is everywhere in global politics. China is “ubiquitous,” a retired Senior Colonel Zhou Bo of China’s PLA told in a conversation with TIME magazine. On March 10, in an agreement brokered by Beijing, Iran and Saudi Arabia agreed to normalize relations, after seven years of bitter rivalry in a deal that sidelined the U.S. Earlier, on February 24, China put forward a 12-point proposal for peace in Ukraine. On March 20, President Xi Jinping arrived in Moscow, where he discussed the situation in Ukraine with Vladimir Putin.

Senior Colonel Zhou Bo spoke about what the “watershed moment” means for China and the world. He said:

– For Beijing, the war in Ukraine is a trigger for new security arrangements in Europe that will have to be made before peace returns. China’s proposal on peace in Ukraine is a big step forward. The success on mediation between Iran and Saudi Arabia will encourage China to make more proposals, but the challenge is always to find road maps. With reform and opening up, as Deng Xiaoping said, China was trying to get across the river by feeling the stones on the riverbed, but now China is entering the ocean.

– We are talking about Global China. When Boris Johnson talked about Global Britain, it was probably more rhetorical. But Global China is definitely real. China is ubiquitous. China’s influence is everywhere. The PLA’s operations overseas are carefully chosen to be humanitarian in nature, but as your strength grows, people have higher expectations for you. We are talking about the world. This is the ocean we are wading in.

– China does have some sympathy with Russia on how this war came about because of NATO expansion, despite NATO’s promises on no expansion from time to time. China understands why Russia is resentful. When China stresses sovereignty must be respected, it also tries to look at it from a more comprehensive perspective. Countries like South Africa, Brazil, or India are taking similar positions like China on this.

– There is no doubt that China wants to see a ceasefire because China’s interests were damaged in Europe. Because of China’s neutrality, China’s relations with Western capitals have soured. This is ludicrous because China has nothing to do with this war.

– It does not make any sense that China, which has not provided weapons to Russia since the outbreak of the war, would change its mind, especially at a time when they have actually announced a peace plan. Why would Antony Blinken say that? By saying it, Blinken was actually giving a pre-emptive warning because China providing military support would be the worst fear of the U.S. But it’s totally impossible.

– The American presence in the region is not as strong as before, but the U.S. will not go away. But on this issue China is doing what the U.S. cannot do. Why? Because the U.S. doesn’t even have diplomatic relations with Iran. It cannot become a mediator between the two sides. The U.S. has allies in the region. It has to adopt double standards. Therefore, China can do a better job, but this is not an attempt to replace the U.S.

– If there were a war between Saudi and Iran, this would damage China’s interests, both economic interests and energy security, profoundly. So China needs to prevent a war and that may explain its new role.

– China depends on energy imports from the Middle East, which make up 40-50% of Chinese energy imports. We are trying to diversify, but that is the situation for now… At the same time, China’s activity in the Middle East now comprises almost everything, from building infrastructure to launching satellites to energy imports, therefore its stake on peace and stability in the Middle East has become higher.

– This is the first time China becomes directly involved in regional security. The biggest question of the 21st century is, if China’s rise is inevitable, will China create a better world? My answer is, at least it can make a safer world. At least it will make much less harm than the U.S.

Continue Reading

World News

War in Ukraine: Congress adopts a declaration of condemnation

Avatar photo



Image source: Czech Presidency

The Congress of Local and Regional Authorities of the Council of Europe unanimously adopted on 21 March 2023 a Declaration to mark the one-year anniversary of Russia’s war against Ukraine, presented by the Congress President and Rapporteur on The Russian Federation’s war against Ukraine, Leendert Verbeek (Netherlands, SOC/G/PD).

President Verbeek said that the Congress declaration is a clear message of condemnation of this brutal war and a strong reaffirmation of the Congress’ unwavering solidarity with Ukraine, its people and communities : “we must continue to show our Ukrainian friends, colleagues and peers – the elected leaders that are engaged in a battle for their lives, their citizens, their towns and their futures – that they are NOT forgotten and that we will do everything in our power now, and in the future, to support them.” President Verbeek also stressed that the declaration reiterated the Congress’ resolute support for Ukraine’s sovereignty, political independence and territorial integrity within its internationally recognised borders.

The debate was preceded by a video message from the Ukrainian Commissioner for Human Rights, Dmytro Lubinets. “The solidarity of our partners strengthens the stability of our resistance to the aggressor and our strong confidence in victory”, he underlined while speaking about the difficult humanitarian situation in Ukraine. He also stressed the importance of mechanisms for the protection of citizens’ rights on the local level for everybody. He described how his office was implementing this approach by opening representative offices of the Commissioner in each region.

In his speech, the Congress President praised the “extraordinary courage and resilience of the Ukrainians and their leadership as they relentlessly defend their country at the frontline and the home front. “The Congress commends the solidarity and unity of Europeans, their cities and regions. We call on all to continue to mobilise and provide large-scale financial, security and humanitarian assistance to their Ukrainian counterparts”, he highlighted.

During the debate, Congress members supported the creation of a special international tribunal for the crime of aggression against Ukraine and the setting up of an international compensation mechanism for the injury, damage and loss incurred by the State of Ukraine as well as natural and legal persons in Ukraine. “It is imperative to hold Russia accountable for all crimes and justice must be done for all the victims.”, stressed President Verbeek.

“The Congress stands by the Ukrainian people at this historically decisive time for Ukraine and the world and believes in a common, democratic future based on respect for international law and a just peace.”, he concluded.

Continue Reading

World News

The strategic situation in the Persian Gulf region has dramatically changed

Avatar photo



photo: Xinhua/Liu Weibing

The China-brokered Saudi-Iranian normalisation of diplomatic relations. What has happened is an epochal event, writes M.K. Bhadrakumar, Indian Ambassador and prominent international observer.

Henry Kissinger drew the analogy of his own accomplishment in an extraordinary diplomatic career when, as Secretary of State in the Richard Nixon administration, he helped achieve rapprochement with Beijing amidst its tensions with Moscow.

One aspect of the Saudi-Iranian deal that has implications for India’s immediate external environment is that the strategic situation in the Persian Gulf region, India’s extended neighbourhood, has dramatically changed.

This can only be seen as the culmination of a series of repositioning on the part of the regional states that have been underway in the regional politics, as they increasingly took to diversifying their foreign policies away from the preponderant dependency on the West historically, and steadily and unmistakably began asserting their strategic autonomy with a newfound self-assuredness — be it Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Egypt or Turkey.

Today, Israel stares at strategic isolation in its region and America, its mentor-cum-benefactor-cum-guardian-cum-protector, stands diminished.

Kissinger noted that ‘China has in recent years declared that it needs to be a participant in the creation of the world order. It has now made a significant move in that direction.’

Of course, Chinese President Xi Jinping himself stated last week that Beijing should ‘actively participate in the reform and construction of the global governance system’ and promote ‘global security initiatives’.

India cannot but be wary that the Biden administration’s main thrust is military deterrence fuelling an Asian arms race, with which India can identify only at the risk of grave consequences.

NATO’s defeat in Ukraine will seriously damage the transatlantic system and the US’ hopes that casting China as enemy might rally Europe are unrealistic. Besides, the China-Russia quasi-alliance will resist. Should India get sucked into the maelstrom?

The US strategies seriously impact peace and stability in the Indo-Pacific, as they are anchored on bloc politics and confrontation, and their self-serving geopolitical agenda is to create a NATO-replica in the Asian continent.

The Anglo-Saxon clique known as AUKUS — comprising the US, Britain and Australia—opens a Pandora’s box as other countries will likely follow suit, which will seriously impact the international nuclear non-proliferation regime and even lead to its collapse. Will that serve Indian interests?

Continue Reading