Inverting Queen Elizabeth II’s Steady Glass Cage Leadership Style

It is tough being a leader, especially a woman in a glass cage  as was the recently demised Queen Elizabeth ll ;overseeing an immensely wealthy global empire. Particularly when such an incredibly remarkable woman is there leading   not  necessarily because she wants to    but due to family tradition dating back hundreds of years .It was  then Princess Elizabeth’s turn  since  there were no males left  in the family lineup.  Afterall, her uncle the King  decided to abdicate for the sake of being in love leaving her father to become his reluctant successor  . When her father died she  served as she promised  she would as her father did; that is , until her last breath no matter how long or how short it would be to come around.

It would be a 70 years journey we will never know very much about ; mostly , the public pomp and circumstance , the Queen’s  gracious smiles and compassionate encouragements;  her public decrees, and  seemingly countless photo ops with the rich and famous and with conveniently posing commoners. And of course there is and will be the gossipy press and  royal family biographers, as a lucrative cottage industry,making their  matter of fact and sensational claims shooting in the dark most of the time since rarely do royal family  members break the circling of   secrecy wagons.

What she did as ultimate sacrifices as the supreme  symbolic though profoundly influential State leader, the Queen,  incarcerated in her  crystal clear glass cage,was  answering a family calling for public good service. To her, her family  calling meant serving  without partisan  public opinion about anything or anyone .Her inclination was to say and do  things  hidden from public view to such an extent we are hard put to know how she really felt about major events and circumstances which came to define her era.

She inherited a  family calling  of leadership over an ancient rather archaic  global and domestic patrimonial ,that is, ceremonial  family State  institution not made for the social media and otherwise digital era with its sense of lost of privacy and making family shortcomings and stumbles fodder for the tabloids ,prime time news, and reality shows. And neither  did she allow herself to  publicly blurt out her hurt about  or defense of family members who went astray.

She is now  transitioning to her  grave with her lips sealed before she died   for an eternity at least when it comes  to the itching prying  ears of the media driven public about her intimate family problems made so embarrassingly public .Never  letting   public outsiders know how much her  favorite grandson Prince Harry  hurt her so badly   with his mother  Princess Diana , her daughter-in-,law  doing the same . And his father, now King Charles III, her  eldest son,also deeply  hurting her though  finally reaching the throne  by  family tradition after her demise  tarnished by an adulterous past the British and global public shall never forget as they look into his still guilt ridden eyes.She was a Mum afterall with family issues so common but just the same could not murmur a word and had to keep her tears in her heart because of the family calling making  her wear that public stoic expression.

As the anti-colonial peanut gallery now is reminding us while  coldly indifferent to decent space for a time of compassionate family and public mourning, her Majesty the Queen, accomplished her astounding family calling without once condemning publicly the sins which through the centuries the British Crown has done to millions in enslavement,  genocide, stealing land, delegitimating indigenous cultures,  and taking their natural wealth and material arts and declaring them as their own. Yet her’s was the kind of public leadership done in silence so you know what she believed not in what she said but what she did; by  when she gets out of the way  of things happening or  by getting in the way. She could have allowed her son Prince  Andrew to get away scot free of his alleged scandalous sexual  behavior with a minor   when instead he was  by  her  authorization, ,stripped  of  most of his royal privileges with his  settlement bill being paid for with or without public funds.She could have blocked now  Princess  Meghan from marrying Prince Harry but welcomed her into the fold and even  gave her more than usual  daughter in law privileges. 

She could have refused to agree with Harold Wilson’s 1960 Winds of Change speech, one of her favorite  Prime Ministers ,but did not.  And  certainly, she would not have bothered to visit  the Crown’s first freed African country, Ghana the following year, let alone dance with President Kwane Nkrumah. Or why welcome President Nelson Mandela to Buckingham Palace over 30 years later?And she certainly could have denied her eldest son, now King Charles III ,permission to spend so much time focused on educational access to the disadvantaged and becoming an icon in the environmental justice movement. Actions speak louder than words and in fact ,are your words if due to policy or personal disposition you keep your views to yourself while  just staying steady at the helm of your leadership job.

I am far from a royalist and am well versed enough in British colonial history to know how much over the centuries the Queen’s ancestors plundered to  the highest degrees. Such  grotesque crimes against humanity  have  allowed her and her family , both immediate and extended ,to live such splendid cloistered  lives in the clutches indeed belly   of such a sadistically  cruel global and domestic sociopolitical and economic institution. It needs to be gotten rid of and as soon as possible. But it will take the sort of   dedicated steady  work ethic  Queen Elizabeth ll  possessed to do so. And it will demand  much more than  the 70 years  she devoutely clocked in each day. 

 Do anti-monarchists and anti-colonialists in Britain and around the world have that level of stamina let alone stomach and backbone   and more than that, the deepest  depth of will to stand , speak , organize, and effectively  act until the walls of empire come tumbling down in favor of genuine justice and peace for everyone? Or shall we merely look and comment after Queen Elizabeth ll is eulogized and buried next to her parents and sister  and soon to be exhumed husband as much as we looked and commented  before her demise to go spend eternity with her Jesus while doing nothing but barking criticisms, writing books, going to conferences,  and making empty fancy sounding proclamations we know can’t really work?

Meanwhile as Queen Elizabeth ll enters into her well deserved eternal rest let us all no  matter how we felt about her, give her  credit where it  is due in being such a remarkable lasting, steady leader tinkering with the system here and there. And those opposed to what she stood for, match and surpass her  resilient decades of loyalty to her institution and change it to meet the calls for  enduring justice  and peace for all characterizing what this century is  becoming all about. Even if it takes 70 plus more years to accomplish. 

My deepest condolences and prayers to the family of Queen Elizabeth and to her subjects of Great Britain and those others around the world now in mourning. And may we be forever grateful for her remarkable steady, resilient leadership gifts and talents. We must  more firmly employ what she taught us about  what steady persistent discreet and not so discreet  leadership is  to bring about the needed changes to heal the wounds of injustice her beloved family  institution has cruelly  caused millions and bring them and their descendants the deserving  enduring justice and peace only authentic wealth distributions and otherwise restorative justice  long steps with reparations outcomes  can render. 

Prof. John H. Stanfield II
Prof. John H. Stanfield II
Director ASARPI: The Institute for Advanced Study of African Renaissance Policies Ideas Mauritius and South Africa former University of Mauritius SSR Chair of African Studies