Connect with us

Southeast Asia

Indonesia between Russia and Ukraine: What is lacking in peaceful diplomacy



Image source:

Some global problems such as poverty, natural disasters, hunger, clean water, environmental problems, population, epidemics, conflicts and wars have indeed colored human life, but a long span of time will cause new problems and complicate life which then requires humans to find a way. get out of the problem either by thinking and doing something idea to deal with the problem or diplomacy with other humans.

What has happened throughout half of 2022

2022 is an unstable year on any side. Since the beginning of January has been filled with some homework until the middle of the year is still coupled with several problems that arise and there is no certainty of the direction to be taken in the following days. At least until now, there have been several events that have had an impact and have received worldwide attention since the beginning of 2022, including

 a. The Covid Outbreak Is Not Over and the Environmental Crisis Until April 2022, several regions in China are still under lockdown. Among them, the Shanghai and Changchun areas are still carrying out self-quarantine, this is due to the surge in Covid-19 cases. Some media such as Xinhua News even described how health workers and civil society interacted to fulfill logistical needs.

 b. New Beginning of Life in Afghanistan with the leader of the Taliban At the end of August 2021 Afghanistan fell to the Taliban. This has become the worst moment for Afghan civilians as their country is ravaged by the worsening economic crisis and humanitarian catastrophe. Foreign troops such as the United States military were withdrawn from the country, many citizens decided to flee and flee to other countries, even when Afghanistan had fallen, people flocked to the plane to escape. Until 2022 many families are separated and do not know the news. Not only that, until mid-2022, criticism of the new government of Afghanistan continues.

c. Myanmar’s conflict is still volatile Myanmar still has to fight to end its internal conflict. Deadly fighting between the military and organized armed civilian groups in Myanmar has claimed many lives. Until 2022, ASEAN and the US are still pressing for Myanmar’s commitment to end the conflict. On April 24, 2021, the ASEAN Summit has agreed on several points of peace consensus. However, the five-point consensus is considered not going well. This consensus was again highlighted in the 2022 Joint Vision Statement issued by the ASEAN-US Summit.

d. Al Jazeera Journalist Death On May 11, 2022, the world was shaken again by the tragedy of the shooting of an Al Jazeera journalist, Shireen Abu Akleh. It is known that Shireen Abu Akleh is a journalist who often preaches and exposes Israel’s atrocities against the Palestinian people, he was shot in the head while covering the clashes between Israeli troops and Palestinians. The tragedy ignited the emotions of the world until the day of his funeral there was still chaos. In June 2022 the United Nations Human Rights Office confirmed the Al Jazeera journalist’s death as a result of Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) fire.

 e. Russia’s War on Ukraine At the beginning of last year, Russia declared war on Ukraine which is still ongoing. The leader of the red bear nation announced an attack on Ukraine on February 24. The initial cause of this year’s war was Ukraine’s desire to join NATO which is believed to be troubling Russia. This war caused a game of economic sanctions which then impacted on the stability of world energy and food. Because of this war, European and American countries are also facing a crisis.

f. Islamophobia in India Islam phobia is not new, but this event is heating up again in 2022. Previously, the United Nations had set March 15 as anti-Islamophobia day. However, in June 2022 Islamphobia again reached its peak in India. There have been several Islamophobic incidents that have flared up since the beginning of the year, but the involvement of party members in India and the drafting of laws that are deemed unfair make Islamophobia in India a little different from what is common. This again stole the world’s attention.

 g. The Tragedy of the Shinzo Abe Shooting On July 8, 2022, Shinzo Abe, who was a former prime minister of Japan, died from two bullets lodged in his neck and head. The tragedy occurred when the leader delivered his speech near Yamato-Saidaji station in Nara. So far, there is no political motive underlying the assassination of Shinzo Abe, the shooter killed the former prime minister because it is believed the prime minister’s participation in a religious group led to the bankruptcy of his family. The shooting of Shinzo Abe not only managed to steal the attention of many parties, but the tragedy also questioned how the security system provided by Japan to Shinzo Abe was.

h. The Bankruptcy of Sri Lanka The prime minister has been expelled from Sri Lanka, the public sabotaged the residence of their leader on 10 July. Sri Lanka is bankrupt and trapped in Chinese debt. Prices of goods due to inflation could no longer be contained, the country could not even afford to buy fuel for its people, hospitals were closed because medicines and medical equipment were no longer available. Don’t know how this country will go next. The main cause is the corruption and incompetence of the country’s leaders in managing money, coupled with ambition that does not match reality, then hit by a global pandemic and recession. Some economists have even made forecasts of the threat of countries prone to bankruptcy.

What do we need to understand?

Some of the interesting events throughout 2022 can be grouped into sections. The departure of several important figures and people who will become a thing of the past, social and sentimental conflicts and racism may occasionally reappear in the future. The transfer of power and the collapse of a nation and state are the regeneration of a system in which life continues and must be fought for, while conflicts and wars that have not ended are opportunities for subsequent disasters. An unfinished war demands a settlement and peace. Throughout the year 2022 that we have lived, at least the current socio-political conditions imply two things, namely: First, that the global order is currently being hit by a humanitarian crisis. Second, there is no certainty in the near future, thirdly that the threat of a Russo-Ukrainian war if it lasts any longer will really be felt even more on an individual level.

Indonesia in Russia-Ukraine Peace Effort

coincides with the moment of the Sherpa G20. Indonesia does not only carry out the mandate as the host for economic sustainability, but Indonesia also has a great responsibility for world peace. This is in accordance with the ideological and basic mandate of the Indonesian state. Since the start of the Russo-Ukrainian war, only Indonesian leaders visited the two leaders directly in an atmosphere and state of war. This is in accordance with the principle of Indonesia’s “Free and Active” foreign policy that does not favor a particular country or bloc. The result of the Jokowi-Zelensky meeting in essence is an affirmation of Indonesia’s commitment to always support the full sovereignty of a country and convey sympathy for Ukraine. The core of the talks between Putin and Jokowi was Jokowi’s affirmation of Indonesia’s commitment to world peace and the sovereignty of a country, as well as his willingness to bridge communications between Ukraine and Russia. The Indonesian president has indeed carried out Indonesia’s foreign policy duties, but will the meeting with the two countries be able to bring peace between Russia and Ukraine? There are some things that still need to be revisited.

 Professor Wangli from Jilin University, in a Diplomacy class once said that there are several conditions for successful diplomacy, one of these conditions is the existence of things to be exchanged (barter system). In Jokowi’s diplomacy with Vladmir Putin and Zelensky it is not clear what the allure of the war must be ended immediately. Another reason is that President Jokowi does not have a big position in international politics, both regionally and globally. This made it difficult to achieve peace, even though relations between Moscow and Jakarta were warm. While Putin has not locked the door to peace negotiations and proposals from any country, Putin has not stopped doing what he considers important. Jokowi’s diplomacy may or may not work.

Uswah Alaydrus (孙美琳) from Indonesia. She received a Master of Law in International Relations from the School of International and Public Affairs, Jilin University, China. She is member of Tsunami Disaster Mitigation Researcher Center (TDMRC) and independent analyst emphasis on Environmental In International Relations Issues. She is also founder of Uswah Home Education Centre for Kids.

Continue Reading

Southeast Asia

50 Years of Clear Skies and Diplomatic Ties



Authors: Harsh Mahaseth and Archisha Tiwari*

The late Prime Minister of Vietnam Pham Van Dong had remarked in 1980 that the relationship between India and Vietnam was “as clear as a cloudless sky”, and now that the two countries celebrate 50th anniversary of the establishment of diplomatic ties it can be safely assumed that the statement has stood the test of time. Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla paid an official visit to Vietnam on the invitation from National Assembly Chairman Vuong Dinh Hu from 19th April to 21st April 2022 following Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s phone call with Nguyen Phu Trong, General Secretary of the Communist Party of Vietnam on 15th April 2022. There is a constant reiteration of Vietnam’s role in India’s Act East Policy and its Indo-Pacific Vision which is cemented by bilateral relations in all fields including but not limited to economy, trade, defence and tourism.


From ‘Bilateral Relations’ to ‘Strategic Partnership’ to now a ‘Comprehensive Strategic Partnership’ the two countries have always shared close diplomatic ties which is a result of their shared experience of struggle for liberation from foreign rule and national struggle for independence. Despite having different political systems, there has been numerous high level diplomatic visits and India has time and again played a key role in Vietnam whether it was supporting its independence from France and its unification or it’s commitment to provide assistance in advancing Vietnam’s defence in the present decade.

India launched its Act East Policy in the year 2014 where it rightfully recognized the need for economic, strategic and cultural relations with South East Asian countries in the field of connectivity, trade, culture, defence and people-to-people contact. Vietnam is a very vital and strategic partner for India and as commented by Ambassador Pham Sanh Chu, India has become one of Vietnam’s top three partners as a comprehensive strategy partner along with Russia and China, but India and Vietnam’s diplomatic relations are stronger.

India’s Indo-Pacific Vision is positive and inclusive of and nations in its geography and beyond who have a stake in it. ASEAN centrality and unity is an important element of the vision. This is as per the remarks delivered by Saurabh Kumar, Secretary(East), Ministry of External Affairs of the Government of India. Vietnam yet again plays a key role in the region and in India’s vision especially with respect to the area of South China Sea that is currently a contested area with China blatantly violating United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea and hereby going against India’s vision for the region that aligns with Vietnam’s.

Phone Talks

The telephonic conversation between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Party General Secretary Nguyen Phu Trong turned out to be very fruitful wherein the Prime Minister requested for greater facilitation of market access for India’s pharma and agri-products in Vietnam and highlighted the historical and civilization links between the two. There was an emphasis on the role of importance of international law when in context of both the current Ukrainian crisis and the situation in South China Sea.

Om Birla’s Visit

There couldn’t have been a more appropriate way to keep the celebratory spirit going than a visit of the Speaker of the Lok Sabha, which also marks the first official visit of India in Vietnam after the COVID-19 pandemic. SD Pradhan in his article aptly recognizes the significance of the meeting and convergence of two law making bodies and their heads who also serve as the representative of their citizens by default. It shows an intermingling of ideas and views of two countries with different political systems. Vuong Dinh Hue, the Chairman of the National Assembly of Vietnam visited India in December 2021 and gave out a three-level action plan: (1) Deepening relations of the two law making bodies. (2) Need for two sides to under one another’s socio-economic development policies and (3) Developing a system of comparing notes on international issues of common concern and to seek solutions to global issues. Om Birla’s visit is a step towards hastening and progressing the proposed plan. There were further considerations given to expansion in areas such as climate change and sustainable development, health care and digital economy. Reiterating the previous phone call and the Indo Pacific Vision, there was a discussion on defence and increase in maritime security with the acquisition of BrahMos by Vietnam being discussed. Dr. Rajaram Panda in his analysis of India-Vietnam comments on how Vietnam considers India a global power and supports India to play a greater role in a muti polar world based on standards of international law.

A very important part of Indian-Vietnam relations is the cooperation on economic policies and trade. India is the most important market for Vietnam accounting got 80% of Vietnam’s total trade with South Asian nations. Om Birla mentioned the desire to increase the bilateral trade to reach US $15 billion from the previous US $13.2 billion while admiring the growth of Vietnam on a variety of economic sectors.

There was a discussion on the partnership in the energy sector with the hopes of renewal of the ONGC Videsh Limited contract for another 15 years. Not only that on a more cultural level, Om Birla also while meeting the Party Secretary Nguyen Van Nen, highlighted the common civilization heritage. The cultural ties are also evident when the topic of tourism was brought up and discussed with an agreement to enhance cooperation in tourism. Speaking of tourism, after the suspension of direct flights between New Delhi and Hanoi in light of the pandemic, the air connectivity was impacted but Birla’s visit restored the connectivity.

Way Forward

Currently the two countries are implementing the 2021-2023 Action Program that aims to implement all the agreements and discussions that took place in the official meets and telephonic conversations. The relationship is a long standing one with deep understanding of each other’s needs and a mutual sense of respect. With a pending invite for the Prime Minister Narendra Modi and policies that expand years, the sky continues to be as clear as it was in 1980.

*Archisha Tiwari is a Research Assistant at the Nehginpao Kipgen Center for Southeast Asian Studies, and a law student at Jindal Global Law School, O.P. Jindal Global University, India. 

Continue Reading

Southeast Asia

Myanmar: Crimes against humanity committed systematically



Crimes against humanity continue to be systematically committed in Myanmar, with ongoing conflicts severely impacting women and children, according to a UN report released on Tuesday.

The evidence gathered to date by the Independent Investigative Mechanism for Myanmar (IIMM), which is outlined in its Annual Report, indicates that sexual and gender-based crimes, including rape and other forms of sexual violence, and crimes against children have been perpetrated by members of the security forces and armed groups.

Crimes against women and children are amongst the gravest international crimes, but they are also historically underreported and under-investigated,” said Nicholas Koumjian, Head of the Mechanism.

Deep dive collection

Since starting operations three years ago, IIMM has collected more than three million pieces of information from almost 200 sources, according to the report.

These include interview statements, documentation, videos, photographs, geospatial imagery and social media material.

The report reveals that children in Myanmar have been tortured, conscripted and arbitrarily detained, including as proxies for their parents.

“Our team has dedicated expertise to ensure targeted outreach and investigations so that these crimes can ultimately be prosecuted,” said Mr. Koumjian.

‘Widespread’ violations

According to the publication, “there are ample indications that since the military takeover in February 2021, crimes have been committed in Myanmar on a scale and in a manner that constitutes a widespread and systematic attack against a civilian population” and the nature of potential criminality is also expanding.

This includes the execution by Myanmar’s military of four people on 25 July 2022, which was carried out after the report was prepared.

Perpetrators of these crimes need to know that they cannot continue to act with impunity. We are collecting and preserving the evidence so that they will one day be held to account,” said Mr. Koumjian.


This latest analysis was released just two weeks before the five-year commemoration of clearance operations that resulted in the displacement of nearly one million Rohingya people.

The Rohingyas have faced decades of systematic discrimination, Statelessness and targeted violence in Myanmar’s Rakhine State. Violent attacks in 2017 triggered an estimated 745,000 Rohingya, including more than 400,000 children, to flee to Bangladesh.

Most of the Rohingya who were deported or forcibly displaced at that time are still in camps for refugees or internally displaced persons.

“While the Rohingya consistently express their desire for a safe and dignified return to Myanmar, this will be very difficult to achieve unless there is accountability for the atrocities committed against them, including through prosecutions of the individuals most responsible for those crimes,” Mr. Koumjian explained.

“The continued plight of the Rohingya and the continuing violence in Myanmar illustrate the important role of the Mechanism to facilitate justice and accountability and help deter further atrocities.”

Dedicated work

Meanwhile, with the consent of its information sources, IIMM is sharing relevant evidence to support international justice proceedings currently underway at the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and International Criminal Court (ICC).

The Mechanism was created by the UN Human Rights Council in 2018 to collect and analyse evidence of the most serious international crimes and other violations of international law committed in Myanmar since 2011.

It aims to facilitate justice and accountability by preserving and organizing evidence and preparing case files for use in future prosecutions of those responsible in national, regional and international courts.

Continue Reading

Southeast Asia

Will Evolving Relation Between Arakan Army and NUG lead To Any Political Change in Myanmar?



photo: Wikipedia

On May 18, Myanmar’s Civilian National Unity Government (NUG) held an online meeting with the Arakan Army in the Rakhine (Arakan) state. Arakan Army Chief Major General Tuan Mrat Naing and his Deputy Brigadier General Neo Tun Aung spoke for about two hours with Foreign Minister Jin Mar Aung of the shadow government’s coalition relations committee and Democratic leader Wu Min Ko Ning. The NUG is believed to have taken the initiative in an effort to engage with armed groups that could help bring down Myanmar’s military regime. Basically, the current situation in Myanmar and the activities of the shadow government were discussed. This sudden alliance of NUG with the Arakan Army leads to the question: Is the political situation in Myanmar taking a new turn?

The current situation in Myanmar

After the military seized power in Myanmar, the anti-coup resistance group (PDF) and allies of their ethnic armed group have been fighting the junta for more than a year, with Kachin, Karen, Karenni, and Chin ethnic groups, in particular, supporting the PDF. Myanmar’s military has not been able to contain the opposition, despite unwarranted attacks, lawsuits, assassinations and arson. On the contrary, in many parts of the country, the administrative system has collapsed, while their troops are losing due to killing and fleeing in the face of resistance. Resistance groups have, however, also failed to oust the junta or drive it out of their area altogether resulting in neither side having any decisive win yet. On the contrary, around 600,000 people have been displaced since the coup due to the civil war. About 30,000 people have taken shelter in India and 6,000 in Thailand. Though Myanmar’s economic prospects have almost shattered, the military sustains as strongly as its former military rulers. The impact of Western sanctions is negligible as multinational companies from China, Russia, India, Japan, Thailand, and South Korea are doing their usual business. On the other hand, The NUG government is trying to launch its own administrative system in central Myanmar (especially Sagaing, Mandalay and Magway-centric) through its armed forces PDF.

Relations between the Arakan Army and the NUG

Following the coup, in April last year, Aung San Suu Kyi’s party, the National League for Democracy (NLD), formed the NUG as a shadow government with lawmakers and allies of ethnic minorities to challenge the junta’s legitimacy at home and abroad. With the promise of a federal democratic union, if military rule ends, the NUG is trying to build trust with ethnic armed groups (EAOs) to fight the military rule. In this effort, NUG is establishing relations with the Arakan Army. On May 15, NUG issued a statement on the occasion of Rakhine National Day and expressed its condolences to the people affected by the military and political conflict in Rakhine. It has also promised to work with relevant agencies to establish justice. The shadow government sent a message of greetings and worked together on April 10, the 13th anniversary of the founding of the Arakan Army.

However, Aung San Suu Kyi and her party’s relationship with the Arakan Army has not been good in the past. While came into power in 2015, the NLD-led government did not play a significant role in promoting democracy, human rights, and the autonomy of ethnic areas. Even having secured the largest number of seats in the Rakhine state, the NLD refused to allow the Arakan National Party (ANP) to elect a state chief minister. When war broke out in Arakan between the Arakan Army and the Myanmar army in 2018, the NLD clearly sided with the army, which angered the Rakhine people. The NLD administration at the time agreed to the world’s longest Internet shutdown in Rakhine State, branding the Arakan Army as a terrorist organization and canceling elections in large parts of Rakhine State. These steps by the Aung San Suu Kyi government further tempted the Arakan Army to transform its demand for autonomy into a struggle for liberation and independence.

Relations between the Arakan Army and the Military Junta

The post-coup civil war situation spread throughout Myanmar, but the Rakhine state was an exception. A ceasefire agreed upon between the Military and the Arakan Army in November 2020 has kept the region relatively calm ever since. The Arakan Army has discouraged mass protests against the coup, and the Rakhine state remains relatively peaceful while other parts of the country were engulfed in violence. As a result, while the military was busy suppressing resistance across the country to consolidate its power, the political wing of the Arakan Army, the United League of Arakan, established administrative control over two-thirds of the state (especially rural areas) and introduced its own tax system and judiciary. To ensure stability in Rakhine, the junta also, as part of its political and military strategy, withdrew the Internet blackout in Rakhine and withdrew the Arakan Army from the list of terrorist organizations after the coup, and released many political prisoners associated with it.

But, the Arakan Army’s recent reluctance to meet directly with junta chief Min Aung Hlaing and its currently evolving relational proximity to the NUG has made the military rethink its strategic and operational orientations toward the armed group to some extent, prompting the military to step up security in Rakhine and urge locals not to contact the Arakan Army. In response, the Arakan Army is also threatening the head of the Myanmar Army’s Western Command, accusing it of interfering in internal affairs. There have also been a few minor clashes between the two forces, such as an exchange of fire, signaling likely future disability.

Change on Course

Although the Arakan Army has not yet institutionalized a dream of independence of independent Arakan, they are committed to gaining autonomy. And the Arakan Army has an endless opportunity to gain international support by involving the Rohingya in gaining autonomy purposefully demonstrated by Arakan Army Chief General Tuan Mrat Naing while making positive comments in favor of Rohingya repatriation and civil rights to the Rohingya. NUG has already announced that it will return civil rights to the Rohingya, with the implicit intent of gaining international recognition. It has even supported the ongoing jurisdiction in the International Court of Justice on the ethnic cleansing campaign of the Myanmar army against the Rohingya.

The Myanmar army has been pursuing a policy of procrastination with respect to the Rohingya repatriation, effectively to gain the support of the Bamar tribe in line with its long-standing policy of feeding Buddhist Nationalism for political scores. However, the experience of the Bamar people being persecuted by the junta in the post-coup period has created an anti-military attitude in the Bamar tribe itself. Now the military is hanging the Rohingya repatriation issue as a trump card in the international arena though they have the potential for international sympathy by repatriating the Rohingya.

 If the Arakan Army changes its current silent stance in favor of the NUG, the landscape of Myanmar’s internal politics may change. Realizing that, NUG is trying to gain the support of the Arakan Army. Now evolving relational proximity between the Arakan Army and NUG will likely invigorate the already growing collective resistance further against the oppressive Junta regime. With the potential for further change in the already complex political landscape in Myanmar, now the question is:  How much will the military Junta change its current policy orientation, be it to the people’s democratic aspiration or rights to the Rohingya minorities?  

Continue Reading