Southeast Asia
Indonesian Elections and Security Politics in the Face of Global Threats

The sequence of general elections in Indonesia in 2024 is approaching, but the world’s security situation appears to be deteriorating. Global challenges are on the horizon, and they are inextricably linked to Indonesia’s destiny.
In Europe, the conflict between Ukraine and Russia is still underway. Apart from historical grounds, Russia’s concern of Ukraine’s position to join NATO was a unique element in the outbreak of the war. Now, Ukraine’s position is becoming encircled by Russian army forces, and the conflict has raised the prospect of a worldwide food crises.
Countries are tense as a result of the conflict. Russia is at odds not only with the United States, which provides logistical and military assistance to Ukraine, but also with the European Union, which is harmed by it. This type of connection is expected to last for a long time.
A comparable situation exists throughout Asia. The South China Sea Conflict, which is claimed by numerous nations including China, Brunei Darussalam, Malaysia, the Philippines, Taiwan, and Vietnam, exemplifies the tensions in Asian relations.
This area, which is rich in marine resources, has exceptional economic potential in addition to its strategic position. According to estimates, the sea has 11 billion barrels of undeveloped oil and 190 trillion cubic feet of natural gas reserves.
China claims historical possession of the South China Sea. The argument is based on ancient Chinese history, from the Han Dynasty in the 2nd century BC through the Ming and Qing Dynasties in the 13th century BC. Then, in 1947, China bolstered its claim by drawing a chart of the South China Sea with nine dotted lines and declaring the Spartly and Paracel islands to be its property.
Meanwhile, Brunei Darussalam, the Philippines, Malaysia, Taiwan, and Vietnam usually base the South China Sea on the laws of the Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ). China appears to be aggressive. In addition to claiming 80-90 percent sovereignty of the South China Sea, the government is beefing up its defenses.
China constructs military installations, constructs artificial islands, and deploys warships in these territorial waterways. Outside of the South China Sea, China is at conflict with Taiwan, which is supported by the US. The usually chilly relationship between the two countries has gradually thawed.
According to Tempo, China’s Defense Minister Wei Fenghe stated on June 13th 2022, “If someone attempts to split Taiwan from China, we would not hesitate to fight back. We will fight at whatever cost, and we will fight to the bitter end.” This is China’s only choice.
This issue has also heightened tensions between China and the United States. The US-China relationship, which had improved after President Trump’s defeat, had to be rekindled following the Taiwan issue.
Aside from the possibility of war, the Covid-19 epidemic, which has been ongoing for at least two years, has revived. Despite immunizations, new variations continue to emerge, necessitating care wherever we go.
The world is fraught with uncertainty. The prospect of war, the economy, and diseases heightens our concern for the world’s future.
How about Indonesia?
When it comes to dealing with global issues, Indonesia looks to be prepared. Prabowo Subianto, Minister of Defense, proposes a defense equipment modernisation program to boost defense.
Later, the Indonesian government ordered 42 French Rafale fighter planes. The budget for the Indonesian National Armed Forces (TNI) was also increased to 32 trillion rupiah for military equipment upgrading.
Prabowo stated that he was aiming to improve the defense. “We will defend the country by all means at its disposal,” Prabowo announced in a press release (11/6/2022) (Antara).
However, ahead of the general election, party insiders continue to go on political safaris in preparation for 2024. They are searching for their own compatibility efforts, while also considering electability, to prepare the next presidential and vice presidential candidates to win the election. Although these acts are lawful, they do not reflect the political elite’s intelligent approach to reacting to the global threats that lay ahead.
The question is, what sort of leader does Indonesia require today and in the future to deal with global threats? Thucydides, a Greek historian, once said, “the strong do what they can, and the weak suffer what they must.”
Thucydides’ remark appears to be essential in the contemporary situation since it pertains to the realities of international relations. It is a reality that a strong country would conquer a weak one notwithstanding all of its truth claims.
With all of its strength, the United States can influence the world through military alliances and soft power. He can even direct the confrontation between Russia and Ukraine and believe Russia is evil.
China has the economic and military capability to affect Asian countries. Through its might, that country may claim the South China Sea and even threaten Taiwan for a variety of reasons.
As a result, Indonesia should continue to strive to become a great power, particularly in terms of defense and security. Indonesia should not be dictated to by foreigners and should retain sovereignty over itself.
On the other hand, Indonesia has a free and active political principle, a political principle that is independent of the “western” and “eastern” blocs yet engaged in achieving world peace. And history shows that Indonesia has upheld these foreign policy norms for decades. A political idea that cannot be abandoned due to the founding fathers’ historical legacy.
As a result, Indonesia must become a powerful country in terms of defense and security. This strength, however, is not utilized to subjugate other countries, but to preserve and sustain world peace.
If it is executed, I believe Indonesia will be recognized by other countries. This is because Indonesia is strong not because it colonizes and controls other nations, but because it has strong defense and security and aggressively reconciles all parties.
Despite the criticism leveled at him, Prabowo’s efforts appear to have begun to lead the country towards a strong entity. So, if the anticipated Indonesian leader is needed in the 2024 General Election, the solution is a leader who knows global geopolitical realities, national defense and security, and diplomacy with other nations.
Southeast Asia
China’s Stranglehold on South East Asia: Shaping the Future of the Region

A global order characterized by multiplexity entails a diverse array of state and non-state actors actively influencing the norms of governance according to their distinct cultural perspectives. In stark contrast, a hegemonic world order is marked by the dominance of a single power that propagates a uniform narrative. China’s ambitious pursuit of hegemony in the Indo-Pacific region, particularly Southeast Asia, faces a formidable hurdle due to its unsophisticated and unsubtle approach to international relations.
Beijing’s diplomatic, economic, and military initiatives over the past ten years and beyond have undeniably increased China’s influence throughout Asia. Since the founding of the People’s Republic of China in 1949, China’s relations with Russia, as well as those with developing nations of Central Asia, India, Southeast Asia, South Korea, and Japan, have reached an all-time high. This expansion of Beijing’s influence and Asia’s response to Chinese initiatives are inescapable in the long run. Undoubtedly, China is the dominant nation in continental Asia, and it has a thriving economy that, while competing with those of other Asian nations, also drives overall economic growth.
However, to ostensibly stop China from becoming a regional hegemon, the United States and its Asian allies seek to maintain a delicate balance of power in the Indo-Pacific. They worry that Beijing will gradually persuade its neighbors to turn away from the United States, accept Chinese preeminence, and abide by Beijing’s preferences in key foreign policy decisions. Thus, a dominant power wielding its power in this way makes itself less vulnerable to blockades and other forms of coercion while also gaining the respect of weaker states within its sphere of influence, even in the absence of direct rule. The lack of local threats makes it easier for the regional hegemon, should the need or desire arise, to project power into other global domains. Furthermore, despite being a key component of hegemonic ordering, China’s increased economic and financial power in South Asia has not yet resulted in the creation of a regional structure that is in line with its own security, economic and ideological interests.
In particular, India has surpassed China in both size and proportion of young people due to its rapidly growing economy and population. Significant increases in defense spending show that many of China’s neighboring countries are actively engaged in vigorous balance efforts. In addition to the United States, other nations, such as Australia, India, and Japan, are working together. These countries will probably respond with even more resolute measures as their worries about Chinese hegemony grow.
Despite that, South Asia has historically rarely been a focus of American efforts to establish global hegemony. However, under Xi’s leadership, China has increasingly manipulated its role as a regional benefactor, showing a tendency to use force and take sides, particularly in relation to India’s territorial disputes with its neighboring states. The goal of China’s engagement policy is to maintain its strategic advantage over maritime communication routes. This strategy has forced the region into a precarious balance in which economic cooperation and strategic implications must be carefully navigated. The region has shown assertiveness on a few issues and has chosen to co-opt each other’s interests despite China’s materially inferior capabilities.
Due to its lack of cultural legitimacy as a superpower and its preference for extensive economic activism, China’s pretended win-win scenario for Asia as a whole has been called into question. As they interact with the prevailing norms at various levels of state and society, as well as state and non-state actors, the sectors that support China’s aspirations for hegemonic dominance are constantly contested, opposed, renegotiated, and reproduced. Furthermore, China’s rise has unquestionably been imperative to maintain global economic growth, with its market playing an important role.
In a world where our omnipotence in all fields is no longer absolute, Americans will face difficult adaptation challenges. We can adapt to change, though, because we have a flexible and resilient nature. Both the United States and China will continue to pursue their respective national interests as they see fit. In summary, since multiple countries, not just the US or China will participate in power sharing, the future world will likely be more complex than the past and will be characterized by increased “democratization.” There will be numerous opportunities for nations with reliable ties to both Beijing and Washington to control their level of involvement in international affairs. There shall be no dominant force and there shall be no such thing as a “G-2”.
Southeast Asia
Indonesian Media Perception of China After Brokering Saudi-Iran Peaceful Restoration

In some degree, we have agreement that regional instability in the Middle East occurred as a result of the reckless US strategic acts thus far. Libya and Iraq invasions have created a chaotic environment for the region everywhere, causing the Middle East not decent to live in. All the more, the long-drawn quarrel between Saudi and Iran which respectively represents the school of thought in Islam, namely Sunni and Shia, not only does harm to the two, but also stir a proxy war across the region. Such two conditions exacerbated the plight for people in Arab Peninsula. Therefore, the more US intervention declining in the Middle East, as well as the rapprochement between two sworn enemies of Saudi-Iran, the more it will open the chance to actualize peace in the region.
Perhaps, it is too early to discuss the impact of the Saudi-Iran restoration on Indonesian Muslims perception toward China at the current time. Meanwhile, it does not mean the event is improbable to have any effect at all since global political phenomena often spark a strong leverage on Indonesia’s domestic politics, especially for Muslim issues. The hottest one was the Indonesian public rejection of Israel’s football team arrival which eventually led to Indonesia being disqualified by FIFA as the host of the world cup under-20. The occurrence is the outcome of the long series of global political phenomena, in particular in the Middle East where Israel up to now still expanding its territorial settlement, seized some Palestinian regions that augment Indonesian public anger. Moreover, according to Anthony L. Smith (2003) findings, Indonesian Muslim society also will never forget how the anti-terrorism campaign launched by the US in the post of World Trade Center bombing on September 11, 2001, discrediting and containing anti-Islam stereotypes, renders ultimately anti-American backlash. Indonesian Muslim fury against the US, the study found, is often triggered by the US double standard in managing the conflict in many places where they deem the US has a bias in its foreign policy.
The facts provided above describe how magnificent the impact of Muslim-related issues on Indonesia is, not exceptional for Saudi-Iran relations. The Saudi-Iran relations recovery at least gives the consequence for Muslim adherents in Indonesia in some ways. Apart from shedding a lesson about how to deal with many cases of intra-domestic Muslim intolerance, the event also opens a new horizon upon the importance of China’s role in shaping a world to be more harmonious. China’s fruitful action as a peace mediator between Saudi and Iran has drawn the feeling of respect and impressed of Indonesian society. However, it is unprecedented imaginary the report regarding the reconciliation of the two sworn enemies in the Middle East surprised the whole public in the world. That is spectacular due to the sudden occasion that happened thanks to China’s benevolence. China is neither actor in the region nor a Muslim country nor a member of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation. Consequently, due to its significance, it inevitably, too gets a spot in Indonesian media coverage. As reported by Indonesia’s distinguished newspaper, Kompas, in its editorial titled “China’s Charm and Iran-Saudi Relations” (03/13/2023), in spite of China’s strategic interest in the Middle East, the pacification between the two camps due to China’s line of duty deserved to get applauded. Kompas is not partisan media and it becomes an important reference for the Indonesian public reading.
Kompas opened its news lead with the sentence “Global power could reconcile (hostile parties), not exploit” referring indirectly to US’ failed role in the Middle East so far. Conversely, China’s tacit approach without fanfare and non-invasive has actually been effective. In other parts of its news, Kompas praised China and mentioned that China is worthy to get appreciation by saying “Saudi Arabia and Iran agreed to reopen diplomatic relations that had been broken since 2016. This was made possible because of China’s commendable kindness”. Unmitigatedly, Kompas also claims that the US has failed in the Middle East, “Liberal hegemony has failed. China offers itself a simple, no-frills peace. China’s economic strength and Arab oil play a role, but peace is a core. Common prosperity could be achieved if there is a stable and peaceful situation. Salute to China”.
Kompas’ news coverage at one blow, albeit indirectly way, describes Muslim happiness inside the country. Indonesian Muslim congregations are enthusiastic to look forward a harmony in the Middle East. Engulfed the conflict in the Middle East often has an impact on Indonesia’s domestic political stability as abovementioned earlier. Thus, the apparent communion between Sunni and Shia, either Saudi or Iran, will also give a trickle-down outcome in intra-religious life, especially Islam in Indonesia. While well-known as benign and plural Muslim, undoubtedly in some cases Sunni-Shia hostility has oft occurred in Indonesia. Achieved current rapprochement between Saudi and Iran, least would open much maneuvering room for dialogue and learning for wrangled fringe in Indonesia to take advantage and similar steps.
Once again, thanks to China. Now, we are still waiting for another surprise upon China’s role in making the breakthrough to realize the comprehensive win-win solution between Israel and Palestine in the Middle East. This expectation also has ever conveyed by Haedar Nashir, Chair of Muhammadiyah – one of the most distinguished moderate Muslim organizations in Indonesia besides Nahdlatul Ulama – it was addressed long-far before the Saudi-Iran rapprochement. He hoped China is actively engaged in freeing Palestine “We hope that China as a big country can defend the rights of the Palestinian people like other nations” (Republika, 2/2022).
Southeast Asia
The Effectiveness of the Declaration of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in Combating Child Labor in Indonesia

Initiated by the United Nations regarding the importance of Human Rights in dealing with the protection of children’s rights, then giving birth Declaration of the Convention on the Rights of the Child on November 20, 1958. The formation of the convention on the rights of the child certainly formulates universal values and legal norms as an umbrella for countries to protect children, therefore, this convention contains international agreements on human rights by inserting civil rights, economic rights , and cultural rights therein. There have been many who have signed the ratification of the Convention on the Rights of the Child in the world, except Somalia. In the Convention on the Rights of the Child there are 54 regulatory articles. As a body that strives for child protection, are member states that ratify children’s rights consistent in seeking child protection and is this convention on the rights of the child effective for use (Human Rights, 1989)
Indonesia has ratified the Convention on the Rights of the Child by Presidential Decree Number 36 of 1990. With the signing of the Convention on the Rights of the Child by Indonesia, legally Indonesia performs its obligations to fulfill and protect the basic rights of children. This ratification was strengthened by the Indonesian government by passing Law No. 23 of 2003 concerning child protection based on the rule of law to protect children. The convention on the rights of the child was ratified by Indonesia because the level of child welfare in Indonesia is very low. Like many child labor activities (Lestari, 2017).
Child Labor in Indonesia
The phenomenon of child labor also occurs in Indonesia. It is recorded that 9 out of 100 children aged 10-17 work in the informal sector and 88.77% of children who work are unpaid. Children who should get rights such as going to school and playing are forced to do work that should be done for adults. The problem of child labor is of particular concern to the world community. This is because the existence of child labor can have an impact on the health and welfare of these children (ILO, 2015).
Many child workers in Indonesia work in the agricultural sector. According to International Labor Organization (ILO) there are around 1.5 children working in oil palm, rubber, and tobacco plantations. The ILO also noted that East Java and Central Java are regions with the highest rates of child labor in Indonesia with an age range of 10-14 years. This has an impact on the health of these children, because working children have to inhale pesticides from prohibited fertilizers. In addition, there are many cases of children being injured as a result of being exposed to oil palm thorns (Kemenpppa, 2021).
Is the Convention Declaration on the Rights of the Child Effective in Addressing Child Labor in Indonesia?
There are still many problems regarding child labor in Indonesia, a big question is whether the convention on the rights of the child that has been ratified by Indonesia is applied to handling child labor. If you look at article 32 in the convention on the right of the child it states that:
1. The state must recognize and protect the rights of children from attempts at economic exploitation, such as work activities that endanger or interfere with the child’s education, endanger physical health, mental, spiritual, moral or social development,
2. The ratifying State shall take legislative, social and educational measures to ensure the application of this article with purpose having regard to the relevant provisions of other international instruments, States Parties will in particular:
a) Determine the minimum age or minimum age to be accepted for work;
(b) Provide suitable hours and conditions of work;
(c) Establish appropriate penalties or other sanctions to ensure the effective implementation of this article (Human Rights, 1989)
In fact, Indonesia cannot apply several regulations from the 54 articles in ratification. Indonesia seems to have forgotten the regulations contained in the article that has been explained. Indonesia has also legalized the law regarding child labor contained in Law No. 13 of 2003 article 68 concerning the prohibition to employ children. However, the law that is made well is from regulations declaration of the Convention on the Rights of the Child as well as domestic laws. Until now child labor inIndonesia is still at 1.05 million working children. The regulation was made without any reports on whether the regulations and efforts made by the Indonesian government based on legal conventions on children’s rights were effective (Lestari, 2017).
Conclusion
There is a declaration Convention on the Rights of the Child actually very helpful to work on the rights of children around the world. The established legal laws are also very good. However, it turns out that the application of existing laws is not enough to be used optimally in Indonesia in dealing with child labor, even though Indonesia has also made statutory regulations that regulate child labor. There are suggestions that can be conveyed for the implementation of child protection, namely that the government should comply with the rules contained in the ratification article regarding children’s rights. Then there is synchronization of programs to fulfill the protection of children’s rights. Strengthen the law by conducting regular monitoring and evaluation of child protection programs. The Indonesian government must be firm in making improvements or changing programs in order to achieve child welfare. Declaration of the Convention on the Rights of the Child must also strengthen regulations so that countries that commit violations are at least given strict sanctions.
-
Finance4 days ago
BRICS vs the US ‘rules-based order’
-
Finance4 days ago
Rwanda receives $100million from World Bank to boost private sector
-
Middle East4 days ago
Gulf support for Turkey’s Erdogan is about more than economics
-
New Social Compact4 days ago
Welcome to Dystopia: A Society Where No One is Paying Attention
-
Defense3 days ago
Why is Sweden still on standby to join NATO ?
-
World News3 days ago
China takes leadership role in Central Asia
-
World News3 days ago
Think Tanks Provide Intellectual Support for China-Africa Cooperation
-
Economy3 days ago
From Bullets to Development: Rethinking Military Expenditure in Favour of Official Development Assistance