Connect with us

South Asia

U.S. Meddling in Pakistani Politics

Published

on

On 27th March 2021, in front of hundreds of thousands of people, in a rally, former Prime Minster of Pakistan, Imran Khan openly announced meddling of “ foreign elements” in Pakistani political crisis. He waved the letter at the massive crowd gathered in Islamabad. He termed the letter as “threatening”, sent by US and is seeking his removal as the PM. 

This statement came when Imran Khan was about to face a no-confidence vote in the National Assembly. He was expected to lose this motion as many of his allied parties have joined the coalition of Opposition Parties. Opposition parties that had formed a coalition consisting of thirteen plus parties are called as Pakistan Democratic Movement (PDM). The opposition was not quiet about their discontent with the government’s performance in economic and political arenas. They said that Khan has failed to revive the country’s economy that was damaged by COVID-19.

An operation of regime change funded by external powers was underway, he said. The opposition lawmakers have the backing of US government. He claimed the letter to contain the evidence of an international conspiracy to remove his government.

He stated that the memo said “if the no-confidence motion passes, Pakistan will be forgiven, if not, there will be consequences.” The letter was given through Pakistan’s Ambassador and was specifically against Imran Khan and his role as a premier. 

The letter was sent by the then ambassador to US – Asad Majeed.  This was on the basis of Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asian Affairs Donald Lu. Asad Majeed has now been replaced by Ambassador Masood Khan. The cable was sent a day before the opposition submitted the no-confidence motion, on March 7. A diplomatic cable from the Pakistani ambassador was cited as a proof in which it was said that an American official warned there would be “consequences” if the PTI Chairman remained Prime Minister after his recent visit to Russia. Imran Khan went to Moscow in late February. The visit took place on 24th February, the same day Russia invaded Ukraine.

The opposition responded by considering such a letter as fake and a ploy to avoid the vote of no-confidence.

US categorically denied sending such ‘threat letter.’ The US department emphasized that no government agency or any official had sent a letter to Pakistan on the current political situation. A State Department spokesperson said, “According to some diplomatic sources in Washington, the letter could be a diplomatic cable from Washington, drafted by a senior Pakistani diplomat.” Later in another statement, amidst the political turmoil it further said that “USA supports the peaceful upholding of constitutional and democratic principles”

The vote of no-confidence was to take place on 2nd April 2022, but Parliament’s deputy Speaker Qasim Suri, blocked the vote in a surprising move. He said that the vote reflected “foreign interference” and went against the constitution, quoting Article 5 that asked for loyalty to the state. Soon after, the PM dissolved the parliament and called for quick elections. However, the opposition responded furiously and considered this move as “unconstitutional” and treason. A petition by PDM was submitted to the Supreme Court of Justice. The Court ruled that the Deputy Speaker’s ruling was in contradiction “to the Constitution and the law and of no legal effect, and the same are hereby set aside”. The ruling was erroneous. The same was ruled for Presidential decision of dissolving the National Assembly. The Prime Minister Imran Khan and his cabinet’s position was restored.

According to the court’s ruling the session was to be conducted on 9th April. It was prolonged with the speaker adjourning the session three times and stretched out speeches by PTI officials. Though the political situation on Saturday was extremely dramatic with rapid and usuals steps being taken. The Speaker and Deputy Speaker resigned just a few hours before the clock struck 12.  Finally, the vote of no-confidence took place on 10th April and Imran Khan became the first Pakistani Prime Minister to be ousted through such a motion. Shehbaz Sharif became the 23rd Prime Minster after a vote the next day. It was followed by PTI members resigning en masse.

Moreover, Russia and China entered the political crisis. On 6th April, Russia lent support to Imran Khan by accusing USA of committing “another attempt of seamless interference” in domestic matters of Pakistan.  Maria Zakharova, a spokesperson for Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs said this was done to “punish” Imran Khan. China also got involved in the situation by warning US against ‘interference in Pakistan’s internal matters.

US-Pakistan relations had started to slightly strain with Pakistan’s partnership with China strengthening more with time. They were also affected by more American focus on India to counter China in the region. China’s rapid rise has been perceived as a threat to USA’s position as a unilateral world leader.

Many doubt the presence of such a letter and consider it a plot penned down by Imran Khan to remain in power. However, other than Khan’s visit to Moscow, other factors have also added to America’s discomfort with Imran khan. 

The visit was publicly condemned by the Biden administration. In addition, the US diplomats in Pakistan prompted the government to issue statements about Pakistan condemning the Russian invasion. They also asked for supporting resolution by the United Nations General Assembly on Russia ceasing the conflict. Pakistan abstained and voiced demands for dialogue and diplomacy.

Pakistan’s Independent foreign policy under Imran Khan’s government had also been a problem for America. Though no major changes were made to the foreign policy, former PM’s vocal stature had also caused problems. His stance on Palestine, Kashmir and Islamophobia on global platforms foreign policy with China, Russia and Afghanistan and his reluctance of normalizing relations with Israel have stirred unease from some countries. Also, Khan’s leadership in the Muslim World becoming more popular.

History records that Pakistani soil has been used by America multiple times for furthering their own interests. From Cold War to War on Terror, we have always been ready to provide assistance to US. Recently, Pakistan’s active role US-Taliban Peace deal and in the evacuation process as well. 

The fact cannot be denied that America always, especially after its victory as unilateral leader in Cold War, has heavily influenced Pakistani politics. Many times, it has intervened directly and indirectly as well.

It is worth noting that Prime Minister Zulfiqar Ali Bhutto has also claimed that an American conspiracy to remove him from power. Due to his refusal of giving up Pakistan’s nuclear program. He told US had “threatened” to make an example.  Afterwards, in a mysterious plane crash General Zia died for which US is blamed by many Pakistanis. This was due to Zia becoming a liability for Washington in 1989 after the Soviet withdrawal from Afghanistan. In the mid-2000s, Richard Boucher, the former assistant secretary for State for South and Central Asian Affairs repeatedly met Benazir Bhutto when she was focusing on returning to politics and was seeking reconciliation with General Musharraf. In 2008, Pervaiz Musharraf’s ouster was achieved by Bush administration more openly through his naive collaboration. The incident took place because of USA’s relation that General could no longer mobilize public support for the American “War on Terror.” 

America has always interfered and participated in other countries’ domestic affairs. It has a long history of meddling in the political affairs of other countries. Such a history spans over at least a century and since the end of Second World War, it extends into all regions of the world. It is characterized by subversion and overthrow of foreign regimes.

So, such an act shouldn’t be a surprise. It has done such things numerous times. Regime change in Iraq, Nicaragua, Afghanistan, Syria and Libya are prime examples of such operations. From Latin America to Middle East, America’s history has been fraught with such strategic interventions. Recently, President Biden himself declared to remove Russian President Putin. Though it was retracted by his team.

With such a long track record, the foreign conspiracy orchestrated by US to remove Imran Khan seems plausible. In addition, the strained pattern of Pak-US relations with numerous points of contention, give strength to regime change operation.  Though, Imran Khan’s move to publicly announce the US move will have serious ramifications for him in the future. 

Nowadays, after his removal as a PM, Imran Khan is enjoying the massive support of common people in Pakistan and even abroad. Huge number of protests were conducted all over the country for him. His party demands immediate elections. It will be a difficult journey for Imran Khan and his party members under the government of opposition with PML-N Shehbaz Sharif leading it.

South Asia

Varisha Tariq – Representing women in politics

Published

on

Varisha Tariq is a writer and politician interested in the intersectionality of gender, class and global politics with culture. She is an Alumna of Ashoka University, and founder of Helping Hands NGO, Lucknow. She has been published in an anthropological book ‘People called Lucknow’ and in news outlets like Vogue, Stylist Magazine, Fodor, CH-VOID, LiveWire, Your Story, Feminism In India and Hindustan Times. You can find all her published work here and her most recent article in Vogue here.

Why did you choose to contest for elections in India?  
Growing up as a Muslim woman I had become intricately familiar with how politics impacts marginalised women’s rights. The lack of women in politics certainly played a huge role in how the policies in the country were shaped. I had always been a feminist who has been interested in bringing large-scale change and post my undergraduate studies at Ashoka, I realise the potential Indian Politics hold. Not just that but the understanding that it’s all about the courage to enter these fields. To quote Emma Watson, “if not me, who? if not now, when?”

Why did you choose Congress as the party you want to support? 

My reason for choosing congress was based on the party’s current policy, leadership and an analysis of its relevance geographically and their long-term vision. The party re-designed its vision to a feminist structure with women empowerment as a key point in its manifesto. It promised to have a minimum of forty per cent women in leadership positions. In Uttar Pradesh, Congress has been strong opposition to the right-wing ideological party, BJP. Moreover, the party leadership is committed to restructuring the party from a long-term perspective and I appreciated the dedication. These were my reason for choosing to support congress. 

What are some campaigns you ran for your party? 

All my campaigns were in alignment with #LadkiHounLadSaktiHoun campaign. I ran a digital campaign to raise awareness about the electoral process in order to encourage others to apply. I tried to break down the process of applying for MLA in Uttar Pradesh as this knowledge would make politics more accessible to people who have doubts or reservations about the political system. The campaigns were planned keeping Covid in mind so they had physical restrictions. 

Why did you choose feminism as a centric theme for your campaigns? 

Having experienced patriarchal and structural defects that work against the Indian woman, and having worked in the social sector, I realised the biggest change that needs to come in India is in the field of policy making. Even if we have strong laws that can help prevent oppression against women, we don’t have a strong policy system that can properly support it. Politicians are key in creating and promoting healthy policies. Strong policies regardig women can only come into affect if we have more feminist politicians. Even apart from that, I have always dreamt of creating feminist social impact and I believe that this campaign has been a start of a lifelong commitment to this cause. 

Do you see yourself trying for elections again despite the outcome this time? 

That is a yes without any doubt. Politics is one profession where you must commit to a long-term plan. For the same reason, this is never rushed. You keep coming back to politics as and when you grow. When I entered I knew that this would be something I would carry with me lifelong and the efforts have to be consistent. So, in short, yes, I will definitely keep trying till it works out. 

What has your social work in the past included? 

I worked as a Resident Assistant in the final year of my college, a student ambassador for Ashoka University for two years, a member of Centre for Gender and Sexuality, Ashoka University. All these commitments drew out a leader in me, a leader who is passionate about serving her community. In 2019, I established Helping Hands NGO where I led a team of six individuals. The objective was to make welfare schemes accessible for the marginalized. Over the span of four months, I connected to more than forty-five thousand female students and two thousand families. During the deadly second wave of Covid, I used my NGO to increase awareness of medical resources available in Lucknow. I worked with Ashoka University and Barefoot International at the time when India was, quite literally, gasping for breath. Today I am working to create sustainable creative scholarships for marginalised young girls who want to grow up and pursue unconventional career paths.

What are your future plans?

After dabbling in the creative sector, development sector, politics and business I have realised that the one thing that has remained common in whatever I do is my feminist understanding of the world. In order to learn and understand more about the feminst leadership and perspective I have decide to pursue a masters in Gender and Law from SOAS Univeristy of London. Post that I would want to come back to India and pursue politics. Hopefully my deeper understanding of Gender and Law from South-Asian perspective would allow me to create meaningful and sustainble impact in politics in the years to come. 

Continue Reading

South Asia

The India-Pakistan Sub-Conventional War: Democracy and Peace in South Asia -Book Review

Published

on

Sanjeev Kumar H.M., The India-Pakistan Sub-Conventional War: Democracy and Peace in South Asia, New Delhi: SAGE Publications India Pvt. Ltd, 2022, pp. 207, ₹1,095 (Hard Cover). ISBN: 978-93-5479-420-9.

The India-Pakistan relations have involved a manifestation of the multifaceted nature of conflict since their independence and partition. The legacy of colonialism, psychology of fractured identities and a deep sense of nationalism have been the leading trends defining their relations. From geopolitical conflicts over Kashmir issue and cross-border terrorism, their geostrategic ties with other countries to the third party involvement of US and China, India and Pakistan have seen multiple level of tensions.

To understand these multifaceted dynamics of India-Pakistan relations, the book under review involves an adequate analysis of their unique relations that is beyond the understanding of any western theorization. The book criticises the theory of democratic peace thesis and reports its failure in the context of India-Pakistan relationship as two democracies facing multiple level of conflicts. The author, Sanjeev Kumar HM, criticize the liberal peace thesis for considering only the conventional definition of warfare, and suggests to move beyond or consider the sub conventional form of conflict through diving into the empirical case scenarios of India-Pakistan relations. It examines the modes by which the crisis-prone processes of democratization in South Asia have contested the central thesis of liberal theory of international relations, which claims a natural link between democracy and war. In other words, the book opposes the epistemic foundations of democratic peace hypothesis by deconstructing its central arguments in the geostrategic context of the South Asian regional security architecture. It explains the South Asian region as a postcolonial territorial formation, which has been plagued by internal conflicts driven by social-economic inequities and embedded complexities.

Unlike the chronological explanations of India-Pakistan relations, the book aims to revise the theoretical rigors around them. The ontology, epistemology, spatial-temporal aspect of every theory is different, thus cannot be generalized. The democratic peace these is suitable for those societies engaged in interdependent community, for instance- European Union. The author has analyzed the transferability of democracy and peace from domestic to regional and then to the global level, which varies as per the history of a country or region. Unlike Western Society, the South Asian region has multiple aspect of analysis- Nationalism, Post-colonial conditionality, and delayed modernity. The failure of modernity in South Asia itself makes it not qualified to be analyzed as per the liberal peace thesis concept.

The deepening of democracy goes through stages like- decay, consolidation and maturity. Pakistan as a deep state, manages between authoritarianism and democratization since the beginning. With increasing emphasizes on Islamic state goals and military statecraft, Pakistan continued to face legitimation crisis and shrinking of public sphere, being a terror manufacturing state facilitating under military control thus has no connection to the liberal peace theses. While despite all the neo-liberal reforms, India has failed to create an inclusive society and over-bureaucratization of development that reflects how India doesn’t fit in liberal peace theses. In liberal peace theses, there is a presupposed rationalism required between two parties to maintain peace that is mostly missing between India-Pakistan.

He has argued how liberal peace theses fails to take following factors into consideration (thus fails to anlyze the South Asian region)- 1) Regime types, as a democracy can be procedural or consolidated or both based on the stage of democracy deepening it could have achieved; 2) Different nature of State, as while India focused on maintaining status quo, Pakistan continued to emphasize on escalation and reaching threshold; 3) State behavior, as the nature of peace and war gets determined by the behavior of states. The most important aspect of the book is the fact that author has attempted to redefine the concept of war as different from the conventional concept of war given by democratic peace theses. He argues that India-Pakistan war are not only conventional in nature, but also have remained sub-conventional that costed more casualties to both sides. The sub-conventional wars have been a result of both countries’ failure in nuclear deterrence.

The book concludes that the democracies in South Asia have gone through sub-conventional war consistently, most particularly between India-Pakistan making their equations as unsuitable to be analyzed by the democratic peace theses, despite being democracies. Their sub-conventional war involves multifaceted aspect of conflicts that involves- a) geopolitical factors due to contest and hostilities over the territory of Jammu and Kashmir, majorly seen as contest between the Westphalian and the primordialist conception of state; b) Ideological contestation between secularism and Islamic nationhood in the context of Jammu and Kashmir most particularly. c) The over acquisition of nuclear weapons by both countries reflects their contested terrain of power politics.

Weakness or Limits of the book:

The book is theoretically loaded with less empirical explanations, which requires a less advanced IR scholar or student to do two or more readings to understand the complex terminologies used in the book. It has given a fair explanation how liberal peace thesis has no application in the South Asian region, but has used only the case study of India-Pakistan relations. If the central argument opposes the generalization of democratic peace thesis in analyzing the relations between any democracies, then the counter-argument of the book should have used more examples before generalization the non-application of peace thesis in South Asia. The absence of enough empirical examples in comparison to theoretical arguments can limit the readership of the book.

How it is good for the IR students?

As mastery on theoretical analysis is a loosing trend among IR and foreign policy scholars. This book will lead the reader in the direction of conceptual clarity of not only democratic peace thesis and its critic neo-kantian cosmopolitan, but also the whole IR theoretical base. How every theory of IR views the anarchical nature of world order and suggest solutions, but not all solutions fit into the South Asian region. This means the analysis should consider the spatial and temporal aspects of a situation or case study as well. Sometimes a theory fits, sometimes doesn’t but following a particular spatio-temporal analysis derived majorly from Euro-American experience limits the scope of analyzing a regional of different spatial-temporal dimension like South Asia, which is full of its very unique kind of controversies and disputes around the issues of river water sharing, transborder migration, cross-border terrorism, diverse ethnic nationalities, and so on. 

Continue Reading

South Asia

Politics of Pakistan: A Riot or an Opportunity

Published

on

On 14th August, 1947 Pakistan appeared on the world map as the largest independent Muslim state of that time. Sixty-five million people out of Ninety-five million population were Muslims. Despite of the shared religion of its majority, Pakistan is still struggling to build a national identity. Earlier, linguistic and cultural diversity were a hurdle but, in the Common Era political imbalance, rivalry and groupings left Pakistan with nothing but social, political and economic crisis with no future of stability.

Division of Sub-continent into India, West Pakistan and East Pakistan was a kick start to the largest demographic movement in history. Unfortunately, Muhammad Ali Jinnah died when Pakistan was less than a year old. The politics of Pakistan has not been less than a roller coaster ride. Till date the State has been ruled by 27 different Prime Ministers where some of them ruled twice and even thrice. Adding to that, the state has been under dictatorship four times since its independence. This political chaos has badly affected the economy of Pakistan. Not that Pakistan is a barren landlocked country with no reservoirs or no beneficial source to strengthen the economy, but, the political riot has played a vital role in paralyzing the social and economic bodies. Pakistan’s politicians have obediently followed the tradition of blame game since independence. Political representatives have always considered it necessary to blame the opponents for unstable environment in rather than being united against the state issues. The truth is that none of the political party could ever succeed in fulfilling the objectives of their five-year plan.

Due to sudden change of government, corruption, fragile institutions, the country’s economy suffered harsh weather. In 1980’s the economic growth was an impressive 6.3% which had a sharp decline during 1990’s and dropped to 4.9%. By the end of dictatorship the growth decelerated to 1.7% in 2008 and political instability accelerated to -2.4%. During the regime of PPP, the Nation succeeded in nothing but increase in economic instability, rise in corruption, inflation, and unemployment. PPP has set Karachi as a portrait of their inefficiency which the city witnesses every year during monsoon season. In 2013, the biggest political parties of Pakistan, PMLN and PTI fought the elections and undesirable results ended in a 126 days long dharna in the Capital of Pakistan with the inclusion of rallies, aggressive speeches and corruption cases against the opponents to hold them responsible and throw them out. The dramatic political unrest forced the country to lose hundreds of millions, foreign trust, foreign investment as well as paralyzing the Capital of the state. Nawaz Sharif was proven guilty and sent to jail, PMLN succeeded in making the institutions fool and Nawaz Sharif flew to the UK for medical treatment. In 2018, the ineligibility of Nawaz Sharif, Panama leaks and support of the number of people of the nation gave Imran Khan a chance to win the majority vote in National assembly. Forced to habit, the opposition instead of efficiently working with the government for the welfare of state, jointly formed PDM to demolish PTI’s government. Protests, long march, boycotts became the fate of Pakistan and which couldn’t affect the government much but, to lead to vote of no confidence in April, 2022 which resulted in Imran Khan’s removal. PTI blames PDM for joining hands with US in their regime change strategy. Even during PTI’s government, the instable economy was in the destiny of Pakistan. Currently, Shahbaz Sharif is the Prime Minister of the State and the economic conditions are nowhere near to a betterment; a total chaos.

The fake promises of every government has left the nation with nothing but empty bank accounts, economic collapse, inflation, extreme foreign debt, intolerance and extremism among its own people. The prime reason to every government’s failure is more or less their self- priorities. It was and is never about the betterment of state and its people but the authority, rivalry and seat. Every government without any discrimination focused on plans which would temporarily benefit the Nation during their tenure but, later due to huge foreign debt and IMF instructions, the country suffers inflation and hurdles in development of the country. Moreover, every new government finds the work of the former useless and terminate the projects, plans and policies initiated by them. This restricts the foreign investors from huge investments as more political instability leads to more economic deceleration.

Another huge drawback is that every government demands the state’s institutions to work their way, for example; the security departments’ ultimate duty is to protect the state from internal and external threats but what they do nowadays is to arrest the opponent leaders, raid their houses, protect red zone and blindly work under government’s thumb.

The biggest threat to Pakistan is its own poisonous politics. The political parties do not find their victory in providing the Nation with excellence and betterment but, the lust of power and hatred has forced the public to witness a psychotic political behavior. Election campaigns, days of protests in Islamabad, societal unrest and cyber-attacks have become a trend which has divided the Nation into groups.

Pakistan is on the verge of losing everything. IMF and other states have either denied or are delaying in providing aid to the country and the major reason is the political unrest but, a bitter reality is that politics cannot be ignored as it plays a prime role in connecting Pakistan on national and international levels. Political stability shall be the ultimate goal as it would help in formation of beneficial policies and would allow the institutions to work in a normal way which would only make Pakistan a healthy developed state. This 75th year and the years coming ahead can be good for Pakistan if elections are truly conducted on their time and the losing parties instead of creating a chaos, aids the ruling party in running the affairs of Pakistan smoothly.

Continue Reading

Publications

Latest

Trending