Connect with us

South Asia

Mohamed Zeeshan – On India’s Quest for Global Leadership



Mohamed Zeeshan is a foreign affairs columnist, consultant and the editor-in-chief of Freedom Gazette. He has previously worked with the Indian delegation to the United Nations and with Kearney, the global consulting firm. As a consultant, Zeeshan helped draft a multilateral declaration at the 2020 G20 Summit in Riyadh and was also involved in strategizing India’s election to the International Court of Justice in 2017. As a columnist, Zeeshan has written for the Washington Post, the Economist, the Straits Times, the Sydney Morning Herald, the Diplomat, the National Interest and South China Morning Post among others.

What inspired you to author ‘Flying Blind – India’s Quest for Global Leadership’?

I have long been a globalist Indian, inspired by the universal ideals of India’s freedom struggle, and as someone who has spent extended periods of time outside India, I have also long been dismayed at the lack of influence enjoyed by India overseas and its absence from the world stage. Even in the Ukraine war, India has been unable to take a coherent policy stand, afraid of some country or the other. I think this is strange for a nuclear weapons state with one of the world’s largest economies. So I wanted to inquire into the performance of Indian foreign policy.

Are you working on any more books? What will your next book be about?

Well, the thing about writing a book is that, once you’ve written a book, you just get addicted to the process. So there aren’t a lot of authors out there who write just one book and stop there! There will definitely be more books and I’m certainly working on a couple of ideas. I won’t reveal too much about them though, because that will make me accountable way too early!

What are some major international issues you foresee for India in the upcoming decade?

In my book, I write about China, which sees a democratic India as an existential threat and therefore wants to contain India’s rise. South Asia is fractious and it enjoys what I call a “veto vote” on India’s rise. If India can’t win over its neighbors, it will never become a world power. But even more pressing is India’s domestic troubles. India’s secular identity is being challenged; majoritarianism is now the norm. This is going to have serious implications for India’s political stability and global soft power, because providing a liberal democratic alternative to the China model is a key part of India’s appeal as an emerging power.

How can India transform its foreign policy to gain more soft power in the global arena?

Soft power is gained when you consistently represent the interests of a certain target group abroad. So it’s important to stand up for the interests of people in other countries rather than sitting on the fence. For India, its soft power has traditionally stemmed from its appeal as a successful secular democracy in the developing world. People in places like Lebanon, Myanmar or Nigeria aspire for that, which is why you see an increase in popular protests more recently. This can be an opportunity for India if it can provide a viable model and stand up for the rights of these people.

While researching for ‘Flying Blind – India’s Quest for Global Leadership’, was there any particular piece of information you came across that personally surprised you?

Quite a few, to be honest. The one thing that really stood out was a Pew Survey conducted in 2018, which I have quoted in the preface. The survey asked respondents whether India was more important, as important or less important in the world as compared to ten years ago. Only in India did more than 50% say that India was more important. In the other 26 countries polled, more than a third said India was no more important in 2018 than in 2008. A further 22% said that India had in fact become less important in those ten years.

Russia recently announced that it does not mind India mediating between the Russia – Ukraine war. How could this be perceived by other countries, specifically the West?

I think India has taken an obviously pro-Russia stance. In late March, diplomats and foreign ministers came to Delhi from several countries, including China, Russia, Mexico and the UK. The royal treatment meted out to the Russian foreign minister was very telling; he was the only one granted a meeting with Prime Minister Modi. Yet, I doubt India will mediate. Typically, mediation is either facilitated by influential powers with clear policy objectives (such as the US in the Middle East) or smaller neutral powers like Israel or Turkey. I explain the logic of this dynamic in my book.

Please tell us about some books that have personally inspired you. Why have these books stood out from other books?

I’ll be honest — I’m a big fan of Fareed Zakaria’s writing style. He employs a beautiful lucid style to explain complicated academic ideas and I’ve often tried to learn from that myself. His book, The Post American World, has proven to be quite prescient when you look at the world today. I think I enjoy books that take a global overview of things, connecting events in one part of the world to events happening elsewhere, because we really do live in a very interconnected world, and people in different countries are more similar to each other than they realize.

What does the writing process look like for you? What are the stages of authoring a book?

For me, it’s important to plan out the flow and structure of the book and find the tone and voice in which I want to write. It depends on what sort of book you’re trying to write. Some books can simply be written as a series of essays, largely independent of each other (and in some ways, Flying Blind was like that). Each chapter needs to be planned further — to figure out the flow across its different sections. The planning and research took up over 90% of my time, but once I knew what I wanted to write, it only took a few weeks to finish the whole thing.

Vidhi Bubna is a freelance journalist from Mumbai who covers international relations, defence, diplomacy and social issues. Her current focus is on India-China relations.

Continue Reading

South Asia

“Haqeeqi Azaadi” or “Political Invasion”?



You call it a “Long March” or an “Azaadi March” or a “Haqeeqi Azaadi March” and lastly according to some people “Political invasion of the capital”; whatever attempt it may be, the impact of this “Long March” will not be “Short” at all. Seems like history is repeating. Yesterday, it was PTI, later it was TLP, then JUIF, PDM & now again PTI. This reminds us about a Supreme Court’s historic judgment on Faizabad Sit in by Supreme Court, which is quite relevant again in these crucial times. The historic judgment of Supreme Court on Suo moto quotes that “The leaders of the dharna intimidated, hurled threats, abused, provoked and promoted hatred. The media provided unabated coverage. Inflammatory speeches were delivered by irresponsible politicians. Some unscrupulous talk-show hosts incited and provoked citizens.” Isn’t the situation once again similar? Doesn’t it seem like history is repeating? Few analysts consider it to be a worst kind of situation.

Supreme Court writes in its judgment that “the freedom of speech and expression and of the press are fundamental right. However, these rights cannot be used to denigrate or undermine the glory of Islam, security or defence of Pakistan, friendly relations with foreign States, public order, decency or morality or in relation to contempt of court, or commission of or incitement to an offence.  He categorically mentions that “PEMRA Ordinance mirrors the restrictions as set out in Article 19 of the Constitution and further prohibits broadcasts which are, “likely to create hatred among the people or is prejudicial to the maintenance of law and order or is likely to disturb public peace and tranquility.” So, Supreme Court has already given clear instructions that if some event is likely to disrupt peace and tranquility, media broadcasts can be prohibited.

Insiders say that we are in a dead end and this is the most crucial time of history for Pakistan, especially when the economic fate has to be decided by IMF on 25th May when Imran khan marches on Islamabad. So let’s playout the possible upcoming scenarios which political stakeholders may have to consider;

  1. Marching towards Islamabad with huge crowds is one thing but forcing a government to dissolve assemblies with this crowd is another thing. Imran Khan very well knows this is a do or die situation for his political career as well. He knows his March will only succeed if he can force an early election.
  2. Bringing larger mobs to Islamabad will only be fruitful if there is some kind of disruption by the present government or by the PTI itself. IK knows that a prolonged sit in without happenings in the red zone won’t be impactful.
  3. PTI leaders have been repeatedly convincing people including government employees, Army officers and police to bring their families in their Haqeeqi Azaadi March. The question which arises is that “Why IK doesn’t bring own family members to join the “Jihad” or “Haqeeqi Azaadi”?
  4. IMF has to take crucial decision on Pakistan’s economic fate. Without an IMF Package, a Srilanka type scenario may arise. The decision will come on the same date as of long march, on 25th May. This is a do or die situation for Pakistan’s economy. So the leaders of this March should definitely come with a futuristic economic plan and tell the masses how will they get rid of this dire economic situation.
  5. While Srinagar Highway will be full of Marchers led by the so-called Ambassador of Kashmir, a big decision is expected to come from Srinagar about Yasin Malik. Unfortunately, it is expected that his sentencing maybe announced on 25th May as well.

The government also has limited options. They are arresting leaders of PTI. They are raiding houses in their own panic mode which will further incite the situation. The removal of fuel subsidiary has become inevitable and when it happens it will be the most unpopular decision. Rising, Inflation will cut purchasing power. Finalization of IMF program has brought them to a dead end.

The dread is in the air. 25th May is around the corner. It is Crucial. It is Do or Die for Pakistan. We must fear!!

Continue Reading

South Asia

When Politics turns Personal; The Toxic Allegations & Accusations become a Norm



Image source:

There is something happening beneath this political turmoil which is NOT looking good!!

Whenever Political landscape turns into a Personal battleground, defeats become unacceptable. These past few days are a perfect case study to see that how Political elite in Pakistan has done whatever it took it to stay in power. In this power grab scenario, there could be numerous losses including the integrity of institutions. We have unfortunately entered into a very dangerous phase, where some political stakeholders have put all stakes at risk, where they have stretched their limits beyond a constitutional limit, all to gather mass support, all to stay in power and avoid defeat. Is it a threat of losing power? Is it a double game? Is it a practical hybrid war we are fighting?  Whatever it is, it doesn’t seem to be good. All is at stake, all is at risk and all is toxic.

As if the political temperature was not noxious enough, Shireen Mazari Saga took place. Once again, accusations, allegations and assumptions started pouring in against the state institutions. Soon after her arrest, her daughter, a lawyer herself Imaan Zainab Mazari alleged that her mother was beaten by male police officers during the arrest. But few minutes later, a video clip surfaced that showed clearly that her mother was arrested by Female Police officers in broad daylight and as per the law. Lie number 1 of the daughter stood exposed. Within moments, without any cogent evidence the lady, known for many controversies in the past targeted state institution for such an act, although the anti-corruption already had taken responsibility of her arrest.

Abuse of power can never be tolerated, regardless of who it targets or from where it emanates. This mantra is true and everyone has an equal belief on it but let’s take a deep dive to see that how politics turned dirty in this case, how blame game took place and how this entire episode was used as a tool to churn propaganda against Army leadership and Armed Forces.

1. The anti-corruption police had arrested Shireen Mazari and she herself accepted that Prime Minister and Interior minister were responsible for my arrest. But the mother daughter nexus brazenly started blaming institutions without any solid evidence. Shouldn’t there be an inquiry on this too?

2. PTI was always of the opinion that why courts were opened mid night to send IK packing while he wasn’t listening to anyone however when same court gave a verdict in favor of PTI ex minister, late night, it was celebrated and much appreciated by Shireen Mazari & IK who have been spearheading anti judicial tirade until recently. Isn’t it blatant hypocrisy? Judicial inquiry has been ordered by the Court which is a positive sign, but the serious allegations which Mazari nexus have raised must also be inquired during this newly formed judicial inquiry. Should the Judiciary not question them on hurling these baseless allegations?

3. The present government, whose Police itself arrested Shireen Mazari disowned this attempt. Attorney General displayed his ignorance about the matter in front of the court. So, somehow the government created this impression in the public eye that they are not to be blamed for the arrest of Shireen Mazari. Was it a double game? Or a deliberate effort to discredit institutions?

Pakistan is already facing serious economic downfall, political uncertainty and civil strife. PTI has also announced Long March to Islamabad on 25th May which is likely to further exacerbate already fragile political and economic instability. It has become quite evident now for achieving petty political ends, our political elite has no serious resolve to address the crisis confronting the country. Country is being deliberately pushed to limits of economic and political dead end. The political immaturity and lack of vision to handle the crisis situation is also hurting the repute of institutions amidst internal political wrangling. If political leadership doesn’t come to grips of the critical situation prevailing which is likely to aggravate further in coming days, people of Pakistan in particular and the country in general are likely to suffer unprecedented damage. Political elite must put its acts together and steer the country out of prevalent political and economic crisis by showing sagacity and political wisdom until it’s too late.

Continue Reading

South Asia

Accusations to Acknowledgement: The Battle of Article 63 A



The weather is heating up. As the May is ending, Political temperatures are soaring. The fate regarding the country’s political and economic stability will be measured in the upcoming days. Earlier, PDM built momentum by taking on institutions. Maryam Nawaz raised the temperature by targeting key personalities and institutions. Allegations were bursting against the institutions in all dimensions. Today, we witness reversal of roles. Accusations have been outflowing in every Jalsa by PTI. But now suddenly, the “accusations” turned into “acknowledgment”. “Complaints” started transforming into “Compliments”. Is it the change of narrative? Is it another U-turn? Or is it the restoration of confidence in the institutions? Where will this chaos end?

The Supreme Court’s “decision” or as they say “opinion” or “binding” on Article 63 A has raised some pertinent questions on the status of CM Punjab election? In the interpretation of Article 63 A of the constitution, the Supreme court categorically condemns the practice of horse trading by calling it “a cancer afflicting the body politic”. Supreme Court in its decision of 3-2 rejected the vote count of these dissident members against the party directives. So the future of the Chief Executive of Punjab is now under threat because it is contrary to what happened in National Assembly. The political instability continues and the situation is messy.

In light of this verdict, Hamza has a support of 172 MPAs in Punjab assembly but at the same time, he also has 4 dissenting members which draws the figure to 168. Now further moving ahead, PTI and alliance also has a collective figure of 168 votes minus 21 dissenting members. The situation here in Punjab is way too complex now. A support of 186 members is required for a clear majority in Punjab assembly to formulate a government. This current Punjab government can either fall through a governor led vote of no confidence or a Supreme court order. The governor even has a right to dissolve the assembly with his discretionary powers according to Article 112 (2) of the constitution. Supreme Court has already made its decision on cross voting against Party fiat.  Now legal experts are interpreting the decision in their own dictionaries. What will happen in Punjab? What will happen on the federal level? Will there be an election call? If so, what will be the care taker setup? Will there be a fresh mandate? Who will make the hard economic decisions?  Lot needs to be answered in these crucial times.

From “My judges disappointed me” to “Thankyou Supreme Court”, a lot has happened and a lot is ready to take place. Islamabad is full of gossips, interpretations, whispers and predictions these days. There is something seething under this political turmoil. The Red zone is under a lot of pressure whether politically or economically. Pre – Elections, Elections and then Post elections, we have a lot of consequences of a lot of hard decisions. But hard decisions need to be taken. Question is who is ready to make the hard choices? Be Afraid!!

Continue Reading