Connect with us

South Asia

A New Afghanistan, A New Taliban: How Has the United States Contributed?

image source: Tehran Times
Avatar photo



Animosities have ended, and we would like to live peacefully, without internal or external enemies.- Zabihullah Mujahid, Spokesperson of the Taliban, 17 August 2021

The friends and foes of the United States have been analysing the withdrawal of their troops from Afghanistan. It is also hotly debated in the US as part of its domestic politics and foreign policy. The pull-out of the US military forces and the end of the American presence in Afghanistan is undeniably a critical issue in the world. Notably, the military victory of the Taliban in Afghanistan after twenty years of bloody fighting among the three sides – the Taliban, the Afghan soldiers and the US-led international forces is genuinely stunning. More importantly, the victory has been scripted in almost a bloodless way thanks to the fleeing of Afghan President Ashraf Ghani. The Afghan military and security forces, along with the Police, have demonstrated extraordinary moments of restraint and patience in the face of armed threats and attacks of the Taliban. The capture of power by the Taliban has raised several pertinent questions discussed and scrutinized in every corner of the world. An overwhelming volume of analysis has focused on the failure of the US in Afghanistan, Vietnam analogy and humiliation of a superpower. It shows one side of the story. But the story has many sides. It is perplexing to observe that analysts focus very little on the achievements of the USA for creating a new Afghanistan during its twenty years of presence in the country. If success means beating the Taliban or keeping control of Afghanistan, it has severe problems in understanding.

The US invasion in Afghanistan and its subsequence presence in the country for twenty years are against the normative order of international relations. However, history shows that every tremendous or regional power has records of intervention in some way or other. Going beyond the popular understanding of the defeat or failure in Afghanistan or the universal rejection of external intervention in another country’s domestic affairs, the US has achieved remarkable success through its engagement in Afghanistan and finally withdrawing from the country. It is not only pertinent to its interests as a global power but also for Afghanistan and the region at large. It may sound challenging the strong line of argument that we have been noticing over the past few days terming the US withdrawal a mistake, or a failure or at least ‘a messy’. Based on profound insights from the history of international relations, it may be argued that the US has greatly supported Afghanistan, the region and the world at large through its role in the country. What are the reasons behind this assertion?

First and foremost, the image of the Taliban 2.0 that the world has been seeing today with a lot of enthusiasm and surprise is the creation of the US. So far, the Taliban has promised a new script of their political journey while it remains doubtful and questionable to many analysts. People across the world applaud the change of the Taliban as they have assured a new set of actions signalling a departure from their past. Although it is at the early phase, it has been possible due to the US pressure on this group from day one in 2001 to the peace deal signed in 2020. The 2020 US-Taliban Peace Deal, formally known as the “Agreement for Bringing Peace to Afghanistan”, essentially focuses on the promise that “Afghan soil would not be used for any activity against the US and its allies”. It binds the Taliban to “reduce violence” and does not mention a ceasefire. Second, the US presence in Afghanistan has taught the Taliban to be diplomatic and tactical in their relations with the eternal actors. The Taliban has effectively applied diplomatic skills in their peace negotiations with the USA. They have negotiated with Russia, China, Pakistan and Iran – countries emerging as their allies. They are now demonstrating it in their critical times of existence in the post-American era. They badly need “international legitimacy, support and aid” in order to cement their rule. The Taliban has already displayed its tactical and diplomatic skills to get sympathy and support from the Afghan people and the world.

Third, the US and its allies have created a counter narrative of the Taliban ideology in Afghanistan, which is based on liberal values such as individualism, openness, multi-party system, free trade, human rights, and women rights. The history of the Taliban is the history of the hard-line application of Sharia Law, use of force, suppression of women rights, and rejection of diversity. Even today, the Taliban has been insisting on Sharia Law as the basic structure of the political system of Afghanistan under their rule.  Fourth, the presence of the US and other western powers and the functioning of the Afghan government have challenged the Taliban to rethink about their historical relations with the terrorist groups such as Al Qaeda and IS. Although they have the linkages with these outfits during their insurgency war in the last twenty years, now they are promising to break their relations with the terrorist outfits. They have further assured that the soil of Afghanistan would not be used by external forces against any other country or institution. Although there is a suspicion in this declaration of the Taliban, it is a positive sign that they have recognized the fact that they have built such networks and linkages over the years.

Fifth, one of the biggest contributions of the US and international forces is the opening, albeit limited, of the Afghan society to the world, which has traditionally remained closed and conservative. Tribes and clan-based Afghan society has little respect for a modern nation-state. It is widely researched that people in Afghanistan have their primary allegiance to their clan leaders, warlords. Due to widespread poverty and underdevelopment, people in Afghanistan have a limited opportunity to familiarize with the modern world. Tribal leaders, warlords, extremists and elite have exploited this issue for centuries. However, over the past twenty years the people of Afghanistan have developed a high degree of global connections. Sixth, the US engagement has contributed to an alternative political space, if not perfect, for moderate and progressive Afghans. The protest of the Afghan women against the Taliban immediately after the fall of the Afghan government is a case in point. It must be seen as a significant achievement of the US role in Afghanistan.  

Seventh, the US has shown the courage to withdraw from a country with a lesson that external intervention has a limit that the so-called great powers forget time and again in the historical trajectories. The Biden Administration has demonstrated extraordinary wisdom and resolution although he emphasized protecting American lives as the core reason behind his decision. The withdrawal has taken place in a time when the US and the Western world are clearly in a global rivalry with China and Russia for asserting new spheres of influence. Eighth, the US has thrown away a new challenge to the succeeding regional and global powers readying to intervene in Afghanistan by supporting and protecting the Taliban regime. Meanwhile, Russia declared that they would not send troops to Afghanistan. China has promised for maintaining friendly relations with the Taliban regime in Afghanistan.

Ninth, compared to the earlier episodes of external involvement in Afghanistan, the US role has been qualitatively different. The US exposed the Taliban to the world, supported the Afghan state and society in the areas of economic development, women empowerment and military capability. Although the US policy makers publicly deny the objective of nation building in Afghanistan, its emphasis on democracy, human rights and economic prosperity has contributed to this objective. The US and its allies have managed to ensure generous economic support to Afghanistan over the past twenty years through bilateral and multilateral channels. Widespread corruption and ethnic divides in Afghanistan have not allowed effective use of this support.

Finally, preventing the Taliban from staying in power with its hard-line, suppressive and conservative political ideology helped the region and world in diffusing the threat of terrorism. The continuation of the Taliban rule since 2001 would have been a horrendous reality to the world if one reminisces the global situation immediately after the 9/11 attacks. The US and its allies have, perhaps, not created a new Taliban, but a new Afghanistan. It remains vivid in the memory of the world that after promising moderation in 1996, the Taliban converted Kabul’s central soccer stadium into a place for public executions. The Taliban have to go a long way to show the world that they are new and different from their past.

Delwar Hossain, PhD is Professor of International Relations, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh and Director, East Asia Center, University of Dhaka.

Continue Reading

South Asia

Saudi-Chinese Friendship: Should India be Concerned?

Avatar photo



Image source: Xinhua/Xie Huanchi

Saudi Arabia hosted the grand China-Arab summit in December last year and leaders of the two nations deliberated on future trade ties and regional security. The summit happened at a time when USA and Saudi ties are at an all time low. There lies massive uncertainty on global energy markets after the West forced a price cap on Russian oil and Washington is looking guardedly at China’s rising influence in the Middle East.

In Oil trade, China is Saudi Arabia’s largest trading partner, with bilateral trade more than $87 billion in 2021. Saudi Arabia is China’s top oil supplier, making up 18% of China’s total crude oil purchases. The two countries have deals in refineries, power and military & security.

 Africa’s natural resources have long been a Chinese favourite. Every year, China doles out billions in grants and loans to African governments as an inducement to secure raw material deals or to finance the infrastructure projects which are ultimately going to benefit its own companies.

What is India’s position on the China- Arab summit that intends to boost development and cooperation among the two? India would be in a bit of a quandary one may assume as Arabs are their good friends, as they claim; while the Chinese are not. The trio of the China, Arabs and Pakistan (being used as a mere proxy), uniting is bound to be a slight source of worry for India. What is India’s take on this friendship?

From a diplomatic perspective, if their friendship and goodwill is promoted, it’s a good thing but one hopes that this does not undermine Indian interest, as any bilateral relation must not  destabilize a third relation. In general when one talks of the Arab world, one thinks of its gargantuan energy power and energy crisis and its management is a global issue right now. With the Ukraine Russia war hanging around the energy crisis, it could be an ‘Energy Security’ thing they are trying to do bilaterally. If a big country like China enters the domain of energy, food etc it could turn out into a fairly big movement in the markets, in terms of prices and availability. India has to reckon by the fact that China is large and when you take out a large chunk of something that is available, that can create a pressure situation for others.

Also the union of China, Saudi Arabia and Pakistan may have certain repercussions on India, as China and India already have problems and those are huge problems, there’s no denying that. Sachin Sawant, Senior leader of the Indian National Congress leader, the country’s main opposition party states that they are already over-exerting their power on India. The Chinese are going on building roads, tunnels and bridges nonstop along the border. India needs to develop stronger guiding principles, when dealing with China and its global intentions are concerned. It is a huge point of worry for India.

India definitely cannot do or say much if two good friends decide to meet, but it does have its  set of concerns. If China forges more business alliances with the Arabs in the energy and other sectors, India foresees instability in the markets which may be against its economic interest. It also is wary of the Chinese and Arabs getting together as this is a powerful alliance and its outcome may have a negative impact on Indian interest.

What could be the intentions of China to promote this friendship further and strengthen their relations with the Arabs. How does India look at this union of two economic superpowers? Every country wants to have good friends. They both have global ambitions and one goes about a decade back or lesser, they had invested heavily in Africa. They went there and tried to get hold of all the mines that were of strategic importance to them. They need nickel, gallium etc which are crucial for smart phone manufacturing. So, yes! They would be eyeing many such opportunities in their bilateral ventures.

China is known for its expansionism and they use their financial strength to arm-twist many countries, especially the economically weaker ones. “They are the Shylock kind of money lenders; they keep on lending money at exorbitant rates and then the poorer countries like Pakistan get into that vicious cycle where China takes hold of all their resources at very cheap rates. India is not at all bothered about their befriending the Arabs, because Chinese intentions are well known to the world,” says a concerned Sawant.

India says it is well aware that the Chinese mean business when they talk of befriending the Arabs. Together the two may explore many more avenues of business which strengthen their respective economies. Would their friendship affect India’s foreign policy in anyway? How affected or concerned is the Indian Government with this strategic partnership of China and the Arab nations?

Both Saudi Arabia and China are also part of G-20, and they must work in some areas of convergence that emerge from this global exercise. India closely follows whatever they are doing in terms of multilateral regional matters which impact the well being of all people, and also other matters that are taken up in G20, like climate change, green development and digital economy. India has sufficiently strong relations with the Arabs and its foreign policy will only be affected if China does something that is out of line of its interest.

Sawant reiterates that it is a matter of concern for India. The leader says that the alliance of China with the Arabs is definitely rooted in more trade and greater geo-political ambition. It can harm India. He says that China has this habit of deliberately targeting India’s neighbours, antagonizing them like it has been doing with Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, all in a bid to weaken India. It has been their strategy and India should be worried about that. “India needs to revamp its foreign policy in dealing with China. On one hand we ban their apps but then our imports from them are also growing multi-fold, this has to stop. Even on the Bhutan front India needs to be more proactive in protecting the interests of people in that region,” argues Sawant.

If India looks at the China-Arab partnership through the prism of G20 then, it will jointly work on pressing global issues and is confident of a positive outcome. However, it would expect  China to cooperate with it in its G20 endeavours. Does the Indian Government have any certain policy to enhance cooperation and influence in the Mid East Region? Yes, the Middle East is India’s immediate neighbourhood. India has an authentic historical and cultural relationship with them which is now nicely developing into a stronger and closer economic partnership. Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) is India’s major economic partner; most of its energy comes from there. Also, it has huge Diasporas in the Arab countries who are emerging as investors in India’s growth and infrastructural development.     

“Any foreign policy is good until is serves the interest of the country. Just on the basis of how you are welcomed by foreign countries and how we welcome them cannot help determine foreign policy; this is a holistic issue. The Chinese President comes here and enjoys a resplendent welcome but that doesn’t stop their army from attacking us. What exactly we do in the interest of the country will help shape up strong foreign policy with any country. The Arabs, though our good friends will obviously be happy with the trade agreements with China, but we must be wary that it does not harm us or our economy inadvertently,” says Sawant.

In the end, India must be confident of its faith and friendship with the Middle East. Being a long time economic partner of theirs, they also benefit from the fact that Indians living in the Arab nations are a huge plus point for them. While there seems to be a bit of skepticism about the China- Arab ties, India should be confident that this will not come in the way of their strong relations with the other 7 GCC countries.

Continue Reading

South Asia

Taliban and the crisis in Afghanistan



Source: Twitter

In 2021, the Afghan Taliban took back control of Afghanistan after fighting a rebellion for twenty years. The Taliban reformed and began regaining territory less than 10 years after the American-led invasion that overthrew the previous regime in 2001. In line with a 2020 peace agreement with the Taliban, they staged a swift assault as the US started to evacuate its last forces from Afghanistan.

Even though they promised to preserve the rights of women and communities of religious and racial minorities, the Taliban have enforced a strict interpretation of Islamic law. The Taliban have failed to provide Afghans with sufficient food supplies and economic possibilities as they have evolved from an insurgent organization to a functioning administration.

Numerous instances of human rights violations have been documented by the UN mission in Afghanistan. Because the Taliban scared off journalists and put limits on press freedom, more than 200 news outlets had to close. Activists and protesters have been tracked and forcefully disappeared, and their government has ruthlessly suppressed protests. They also reinstated the Ministry for the Propagation of Virtue and the Prevention of Vice, which was previously in place, and enforced laws against actions judged to be contrary to Islam. They instructed judges to apply their version of sharia in November 2022; in the following weeks, authorities resumed public hangings and floggings.

Women’s rights have been undermined. Due to restrictions put in place by the Taliban, girls are not allowed to go to high school, and women are not allowed to go to college or teach there. The group banned women from working for local and international voluntary groups in December 2022. According to estimates from the UN Development Program (UNDP), limiting women’s employment might cost Afghanistan’s GDP up to 5%. Amnesty International reports a substantial increase in the number of women jailed for defying discriminatory rules, such as those requiring women to cover their whole bodies while in public and to only appear with male chaperones. In addition, there are now more child marriages.

The UNDP says that the Taliban’s rule has also taken away the gains that Afghans made in their living conditions in the 20 years after the US invasion. In a study from October 2022, the organization claimed that practically all Afghans were living in poverty. Since the takeover, the economy has contracted by up to 30%, and there have been an estimated 700,000 job losses. More than 90% of individuals are impacted by food insecurity. The problem is getting worse because several countries and international groups have stopped giving aid, which is vital to the economy and public health.

International observers are nonetheless worried that the Taliban pose a danger to national and international security through their funding of terrorist groups, especially Al-Qaeda. Taliban leadership might convert Afghanistan into a haven for terrorists who could launch attacks against the US and its allies, despite Taliban pledges that the country’s territory wouldn’t be used against the security of any other country. The violence has also increased along Pakistan’s border with Afghanistan, which has always supported the Taliban. Tehrik-e-Taliban, a terrorist organization commonly referred to as the Pakistani Taliban, has gained strength due to the Taliban’s ascent to power. The organization broke off a cease-fire with the Pakistani government in 2022 and began carrying out assaults throughout the nation. Officials from Pakistan have charged the Afghan Taliban with giving the extremists a safe harbor in their country.

For many years, the Afghan government relied on help from a number of countries; according to 2019 World Bank research, contributions from foreign partners funded 75% of the government’s public expenditures. Many of these countries stopped off aid when the Taliban took control, fueling concerns about potential future economic turmoil. Nevertheless, aid rose in 2022 as donors sent more than $2.6 billion. The US has donated more than $1.1 billion in help since the coup. However, according to UN authorities, the pledges fell short of the nation’s humanitarian requirements.

Many Western countries, most notably the US, shut down their diplomatic posts in Afghanistan when the Taliban took power. Diplomatic relations and recognition have been withheld from the Taliban regime, which refers to Afghanistan as the Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan. The UN General Assembly has also postponed a decision on who would indefinitely represent Afghanistan at the UN. The Taliban are now being investigated by the International Criminal Court for suspected atrocities, including crimes against humanity, committed against Afghans.

Continue Reading

South Asia

Decoding Donald Lu’s Visit: A Positive Upward in US-Bangladesh Relations?

Avatar photo



The U.S Assistant Secretary for South and Central Asia Donald Lu paid a visit from January 12 to 15. During his brief but swarming itinerary the two parties discussed various issues ranging from diplomatic to political. Interestingly, this is the 11th visit of any U.S high-official in the past two years. The frequent swapping of delegations from the both sides pose a critical juncture between the U.S-Bangladesh relationship. Experts believe that recurrent visits from US high-ups are definitely an auspicious sign between the relationship of the two nations. Therefore, the visit of Donald Lu is an offshoot of the “growing reciprocity and renewed engagement” between Dhaka and Washington.

Needless to say, Bangladesh has a long standing and steady relationship with the US since the latter recognized the former shortly after independence on April 04, 1972. Recently the US-Bangladesh celebrated the completion of 50 years of bilateral relationship and US President Joe Biden termed this as “robust partnership”. Amid such backdrop, it goes without saying that the recent visits signal to a significant positive tie-up between the two parties and the visit can be interpreted in the context of international and domestic backdrop of international politics.

The US is the largest market for Bangladesh’s RMG export. Naturally, the issue of GSP reinstatement plays a key role in bilateral camaraderie. Under such circumstances, Lu’s visit is important to hold talks of economic in the context of Bangladesh’s growing needs, especially after the LDC graduation. Moreover, in the annual Global Firepower 2023 Military Strength Ranking, Bangladesh is placed 40th out of 145 nations. On the other hand, Bangladesh came in 12th place on the GFP review’s list of ‘Strengths on the Rise,’ which emphasizes national military powers based on strong growth patterns until 2023. In this context, the General Security of Military Information Agreement (GSOMIA) and Acquisition and Cross-servicing Agreement (ACSA) agreement indicates to a deeper and strategic engagement from the US rationale.

Bangladesh’s stands at the heart of a strategic position of the US’s Indo-Pacific Strategy, which aims to counter the increasing footprint of China in the Indo-Pacific region. However, Bangladesh maintains a neutral position in terms of its foreign relations and has been carefully helming without taking any side of any major powers. Washington’s focus on free and fair election is important to maintain a stability in the greater Bay of Bengal neighborhood- an important feat in it’s IPS. Conversely, Bangladesh values economic partnership to sustain her ongoing upward trend. However, at the same time Bangladesh should be careful not to succumb to any pressure, a case in point when the Foreign Minister announced that the US proposed strategy is being vetted under the lens of economic opportunity.

On the domestic fore, arguably, the U.S has been advocating for a free and fair election, upholding democratic values, and condemning extra judicial excesses. However, continuous engagement between the two parties resulted helping to mitigate tensions and create a more positive atmosphere. The crux of Donald Lu’s visit is to reaffirm democratic ideals in state mechanism, rule based international system and Bangladesh to be part of the Indo-Pacific Strategy. Accordingly, Bangladesh has committed to hold a fair election and the recent decline of the controversial RAB’s extrajudicial excesses reported by Human Rights Watch as well as peaceful demonstrations of the opposition have been markedly praised by Donald Lu. From Bangladesh’s perspective rescinding of sanctions, reinstatement of GSP, and more support for Rohingya Refugees were reiterated. More importantly, Dhaka’s impartial foreign policy goals align with Washington’s interest in the South Asian region and it will be of American interest to consider Bangladesh as an important ally in the geopolitical chessboard of the Indo-Pacific region.  

However, the visit is also crucial for Donald Lu who is accused of meddling with the internal affairs of Pakistan, Sri Lanka and Nepal. But, Donald Lu manifested his diplomatic acumen to “manage the fissures of the diplomatic ties’ and “highlight on the areas of convergence” in the recent visit. Evidently, the past year has been tumultuous for South Asian nations, following the collapse of Colombo, the Pakistani Economic Crisis and the revolving debt crisis around the region. Amongst her neighbors, Bangladesh has endured relatively steady political and economic pursuit. Therefore, US needs to formulate a comprehensive South Asian policy to accommodate the interests of the respective nations on its own merit.

Bangladesh’s relationship with the U.S is vital in both economic and political stance. Continued engagement and partnership between the two states is critical for the security of South Asia as well as Bangladesh’s ongoing economic prosperity. On a pragmatic tone, it would take more than just this one visit for Bangladesh to solve these complex geopolitical issues. For now, the visit has symbolized strengthening of U.S-Bangladesh relationship going forward by exonerating the mutual interests to diplomatically resolve pressing bilateral issues and elevation of continuous engagement.

Continue Reading



Eastern Europe17 mins ago

China Still Ambivalent About the Middle Corridor

Despite the oft-touted momentum behind the Eurasian Middle Corridor circumventing Russia, China still appears not to be fully behind the...

Finance3 hours ago

European farms mix things up to guard against food-supply shocks

By ETHAN BILBY ‘Items in this section have limited availability due to supplier production issues,’ ‘Sorry, temporarily out of stock’ and...

Finance5 hours ago

Astana hosts 18th Iran-Kazakhstan Joint Economic Committee meeting

The 18th meeting of Iran-Kazakhstan Joint Economic Committee meeting was held on Thursday in Kazakhstan’s capital Astana, at the end...

World News7 hours ago

The importance of Iran’s membership in the SCO

The members of Majlis (the Parliament) have approved the emergency of the plan of Iran’s commitments to achieve the position...

World News9 hours ago

Sabah: ‘The Americans have deceived themselves, the Europeans and Ukraine’

The US is repeating the same mistakes as in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya and Syria. Now – in Ukraine. So it...

South Asia11 hours ago

Saudi-Chinese Friendship: Should India be Concerned?

Saudi Arabia hosted the grand China-Arab summit in December last year and leaders of the two nations deliberated on future...

Southeast Asia13 hours ago

China’s assurance of Rohingya repatriation between Myanmar-Bangladesh

We now have new hope thanks to news reports that were published in the Bangladeshi dailies on Tuesday and contained...