Connect with us

Middle East

Blank Ballots Signal Crack in Regime’s Control

Avatar photo



In Iran, a boycott of the regime’s sham election was part of a more significant protest against the policies of its leadership. However, for those who showed up to vote, the unprecedented large number of blank ballots signal the people’s dismay with the regime and its Supreme Leader.

This dissatisfaction and absence of trust created a negative dichotomy between the people and the government, which reached its highest today. Former Iranian President Mohammad Khatami called the (unprecedented) unwillingness of more than 50% of the people to vote and the presence of the highest percentage of blank ballots as an important event and said: “If this is not a sign of dismay, disappointment, and dissatisfaction of the people towards the government, then what could it be called? What is it indicative of?”

According to statistics provided by the Iranian regime, 62% of the eligible voters did not participate in the recent presidential election. This turnout echoes the voting in the parliamentary elections in March 2009 in which 62% or 33 million eligible people did not participate. Most people in Iran’s living conditions are worsening as days and weeks pass by. The prediction was that the presidential election would face the same low turnout destiny as the March 2009 parliamentary election turned out to be true.

While the Islamic Republic has a dark history of providing accurate statistics, transparency on all levels is one of its worst traits. Iran’s chains of lies regarding the Ukrainian plane crash, the actual death toll in the widespread mid-November 2019 uprising, and the falsified number of coronavirus victims are just a few examples of the lack of transparency. The Iranian opposition, citing 1,200 reports from 400 Iranian cities and thousands of videos and photos from different voting constituencies, declared that the Iranian regime’s number of those who voted in the presidential election is five times higher than the real number. The actual number of participants in this year’s vote was less than ten percent.

According to statistics provided by the regime, more than 4 million of those who voted cast blank ballots because of fear of intimidation, including prison, interrogation, and other abuses. These people went to the polling stations and had their identification paper stamped to avoid further punitive measures. However, they did not vote for anyone. It has been noted that many of these blank ballots were from members of the revolutionary guards, paramilitary Bassij forces, and servicemen who see the Supreme Leader’s weakness and desperation. As a result, they are losing confidence in him.

This unprecedented purposeful gesture by a portion of the population considered the main body that the regime depends on and supporting them for many years is the first of its nature in the 40-year reign of the mullah’s regime in Iran.

Call for a Boycott
It worth noting that before the election, Iran’s Supreme Leader Khamenei had issued a fatwa, saying that voting is a religious obligation and opting not to vote is considered a great sin. Despite all regime’s propaganda, intimidations, hollow promises, bribes, and more, the people’s call for the election boycott was welcomed by the people. It showed itself in the final tally.

In any situation that the Supreme Leader’s fatwa is ignored by the people and loses its pull and effectiveness, the presence and influence of Iran’s opposition become very evident, and this is an alarm for the Supreme Leader and the entire regime.

The Iranian opposition, the National Council of Resistance of Iran, claims that its resistance units have rapidly expanded throughout Iran since the mid-November 2019 uprising and have spread the message of election boycott among people successfully.

Three-quarters of the people in the greater City of Tehran and two-thirds of the people of Tehran province did not participate in the presidential election. These numbers suggest that the non-participation in Tehran province was 70% and about 80% in the City of Tehran.

According to ISNA (Iran’s official news), the total number of invalid and blank ballots in Tehran province was 70%! However, Iran’s official news outlets announced the presidential election as a victory for the Islamic Republic. One cannot deny that the level of people’s dissatisfaction and distrust of the government is high. A media outlet close to the regime says that the concentration of power in the hands of a few government institutions should not lead to the elimination of the vulnerable. The vulnerable of the society is once again showing off their power, and this time they may do so more tremendously than in the mid-November 2019 uprising.

An Unprecedented Number of Blank Votes in the City Council Elections

This year, city and village council elections were held at the same time as the presidential election. As a result, the number of those who voted this year was less than 75% compared to the last term. One of the rare events in the recent city and village council elections was more blank votes than those cast for candidates. In Karaj City Council, blank ballots ranked first. The number of blank ballots in the Karaj City Council elections was announced to be 38,888 votes, which is about 16,000 more than the first candidate elected.

It is unprecedented in the history of the elections of the Islamic Republic that in some metropolises such as Karaj, Arak, and Hamedan, the blank votes ranked first. In Tehran, the blank votes ranked second.

Suppose one opts to close eyes on the decline in popular participation in the regime’s elections. In that case, one should pay attention to the citizens’ participation rate, Tehran, which according to the regime’s statistics, has dropped to 26%. This situation is no longer a warning but an actual fire. The number of people voting in the farthest parts of the country will be similar to that of the people of Tehran because the other cities often follow the trends in the country’s capital.

Alternative Force, A Reality?

Azad Armaki, a sociologist and professor at the University of Tehran, says: “I have been talking about a third force for one or two years, whose candidates are neither reformist nor fundamentalist factions of the regime; it is another candidate. Those who cast blank votes have practically crossed the reformist-fundamentalist dichotomy. This phenomenon shows that a large part of society no longer acts in the previous framework and is choosing to travel in other directions.”

From the perspective of jurisprudence, we analyze participation in elections as a vote for the system. According to the regime itself, the non-participation of 62% of the people in the elections requires fundamental reforms in the country’s elections’ legal structure. The existing structure of the regime is the only cause of what is happening in Iran’s society. A genuine and fundamental change can only occur if the jurisprudent’s absolute authority or the absolute monarchy is demolished and removed. That means the end of the mullahs’ regime.

For years, the government has had two strategies. The first is to ignore the people’s voices and continue this course of oppression, awaiting the consequences of the people’s dissatisfaction, including turning their backs on the ballot box. The second is to change its behavior, take into account the people’s vote, and embrace democracy in the true sense of the word. Unfortunately, choosing the second strategy can be costly for the Islamic Republic.

Looking at this regime and its crackdown on people’s gatherings, demonstrations, strikes, and especially the brutal crackdown on the innocent protestors of the 2017 and 2019 uprisings, it is clear they are choosing the first strategy. But, more importantly, the appointment of a president who was involved in the 1988 massacre of political prisoners indicates the regime has decided to implement its suppressive apparatus on the people of Iran. Looking at history teaches us that no dictatorship has survived democracy.

Mr. Enayat (@h_enayat) is an expert on Iran and a writer based in Paris, where he has written frequently on Iranian and regional issues in the past thirty years.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Can Erdogan repay the people’s trust?

Avatar photo



Image credit: Murat Kula/Anadolu Agency

The Turkiye nation has concluded the most important election in the country’s modern history. The people of modern Turkey came to determine their destiny at a time when their national economic condition is at a very deplorable level. The depreciation of the lira against the dollar has made the cost of goods and the cost of living more expensive. Inflation is now rampant in the country. Economists say inflation reached 85 percent last year.

The country’s currency, the lira, has fallen to a tenth of its value against the dollar over the past decade. Abnormal inflation causes the prices of goods to rise. Imports cost more as the lira depreciates. On the other hand, 11 provinces in Turkey are struggling to deal with the shock of two earthquakes recently. More than 50 thousand people died in this earthquake.

Despite this severe national crisis and economic instability, the majority of the Turkish people have not lost faith in Erdogan. This is an amazing event. Turkey’s 2023 national election reinstated Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, the sultan in power for the past 20 years, as president. On the other hand, the main challenger, the presidential candidate of the Nations Alliance and the leader of the secular Republican People’s Party (CHP), Kemal Kilizdarglu, was defeated.

Erdoğan was elected the first mayor of Istanbul in 1994. At that time, he took the initiative to solve various problems that arose in Istanbul due to rapid population growth, such as air pollution, waste collection, and a shortage of clean water. However, after four years, he had to stand in court for reciting a controversial poem. Erdogan was sentenced to four months in prison for spreading religious hatred. Basically, this event was the unforgettable beginning of the significant public opinion formation behind his rise.

Recep Tayyip Erdogan took power as the country’s prime minister in 2003. The people of Turkey trusted him in the 2018 elections as well. Recep Tayyip Erdogan has been elected President of Turkey for the third consecutive term. He will lead the country in the international arena for the next five years. Turkey will create a new equation in geopolitics. An experienced Erdogan will negotiate well with international actors.

Erdogan comes from the conservative political camp. He entered politics with the Salvation Party of political guru Nazimuddin Erbakan. In 1976, he was elected head of the Beyoglu region of the youth wing. The National Salvation Party was headed by Nazimuddin Erbakan. He later served as Prime Minister of Turkey in 1996–97.

Modern Turkey emerged as a secular state under Mustafa Kemal Atatürk in the 1920s. Erdogan created a new national manifesto with a lot of new energy, new plans, and a new national manifesto in that country. The first decade of his AK Party rule saw democratic reforms in Turkey. It had to be done because of the country’s desire to join the European Union. During this time, Erdogan was praised by liberals at home and abroad for reducing the authority of the army in the country and working to protect the rights of women and minority ethnic groups. However, Erdogan was criticized for becoming more authoritarian over the next decade. According to many, Erdogan has exacerbated divisions in Turkey.

Basically, he became popular in the Muslim world by expressing his anti-US and especially anti-European attitude in the polls, winning the hearts of the voters, and developing relations with Muslim countries. He converted Turkey from a parliamentary system to a presidential system in 2014. According to the opposition, Erdogan made such changes in the regime to enjoy sole power. Erdogan’s supporters regard him as ‘fatherly’, but opponents consider him an ‘authoritarian’ ruler. Its reflection can be seen in the international environment. During Erdogan’s regime, on the one hand, the distance between Turkey, an important member of NATO, and its allies, the United States and Europe, increased. At the same time, the closeness is increasing with anti-Western Russia and China.

Jeffrey Mankoff, an analyst at the Washington, DC-based Center for Strategic and International Studies, said, “Many officials and political leaders in Western countries are upset with Turkey’s Erdogan. They expressed disappointment in him. They believe that Erdogan is the main reason for Turkey’s growing distance from the West. He took everything personally and walked the path of cheap popularity.’

Therefore, with Erdogan ruling Turkey for the past 20 years, there has been a major change in Turkey’s foreign policy as well as socio-economic development. As a result of his long rule, he made many enemies and allies at home and abroad. Now it’s time to just watch, as Turkey’s economy is also seen as a big factor in this election. Will Erdogan be able to restore Turkey’s conventional economy, and how will he repay the public’s trust? These questions have become important.

Continue Reading

Middle East

The 32nd Arab League meeting will have a far-reaching impact



Image source: China Daily

The Arab League is an alliance of states that currently has 22 member states in Northern Africa and on the Arabian Peninsula, which belongs geographically to Asia. All member countries together cover an area of 13.15 million km² (8.7% of the world’s inhabitable area). Significant parts are desert regions such as the Sahara and the Rub al-Khali sand desert. With about 456.52 million inhabitants, the area is home to about 5.8 percent of the world’s population.

On October 7, 1944, a “Protocol of Alexandria” was signed as a loose union. After elaborating on the ideas, the Arab League was founded the following year on 11 May 1945. The first member states were the kingdoms of Egypt, Iraq, Saudi Arabia, and Yemen, as well as Lebanon, Syria, and the then Emirate of Transjordan.

The history of the Arab League since then has been marked by numerous political and military conflicts in the region. In the immediate post-war period, the growing Jewish population in Palestine played a major role. This led to the division of Palestine into a Jewish and an Arab state in 1949. With the withdrawal of the British Allies, there was also a lack of an overarching protective power and serious and recurrent conflicts with Israel arose.

The recent 32nd Arab League Meeting held in the magnificent city of Jeddah, Saudi Arabia, has drawn to a successful close, leaving a profound impact on regional politics. High-ranking officials and diplomats from Arab nations gathered to discuss pressing issues and forge a path toward greater cooperation and unity. The meeting, which took place against a backdrop of evolving geopolitical dynamics, produced key decisions that are poised to shape the future of the Arab world.

Hosted by the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia, a staunch advocate of Arab solidarity and stability, the summit aimed to bolster inter-Arab relations and address the region’s most pressing challenges. Under the gracious patronage of His Majesty King Salman bin Abdulaziz Al Saud, leaders and representatives from across the Arab League engaged in constructive dialogue, fostering an atmosphere of camaraderie and shared vision.

One of the major highlights of the meeting was the unanimous agreement on establishing a joint counterterrorism center. This significant step underscores the Arab League’s commitment to combating terrorism and maintaining regional security. The center will serve as a platform for intelligence sharing, coordinated efforts, and capacity building among member states, further enhancing the collective response to the ever-present threat of extremism.

In addition to counterterrorism initiatives, the Arab League delegates focused on revitalizing the Arab Peace Initiative, which has been instrumental in pursuing a just and lasting resolution to the Israeli-Palestinian conflict. The participants expressed their unwavering support for the rights of the Palestinian people and called for renewed international efforts to resume meaningful negotiations. The Arab League’s stance sends a clear message that a comprehensive and equitable solution is imperative for sustainable peace in the region.

Moreover, discussions during the summit centered on the ongoing crises in Libya, Syria, and Yemen. Arab League members pledged increased support and cooperation in finding political solutions and bringing stability to these war-torn nations. The delegates affirmed their commitment to the principles of sovereignty, territorial integrity, and non-interference, emphasizing the need for inclusive dialogue to end conflicts and restore peace.

The political impact of the Arab League Meeting cannot be understated. It signifies a renewed commitment to Arab unity and cooperation amid a rapidly changing regional landscape. The decisions made in Jeddah hold the potential to shape the political dynamics of the Arab world, ensuring stability, security, and prosperity for its nations and peoples.

The meeting also provided an opportunity for member states to strengthen bilateral relations and engage in fruitful discussions on areas of mutual interest. In the spirit of constructive diplomacy, numerous side meetings and cultural exchanges took place, fostering greater understanding and cooperation among Arab nations.

As the Arab League Meeting drew to a close, the host nation, Saudi Arabia, expressed gratitude to all participating countries for their valuable contributions and emphasized its commitment to further collaboration in the future. The outcomes of the meeting will be diligently pursued and implemented, underlining the shared determination of Arab nations to overcome challenges and seize opportunities for progress.

This time the participation of Syria was a milestone, it happened after 12 years of absence. Another important aspect was the attendance of Ukrainian President Zelenskyy. These two important aspects will have far-reaching impacts on regional politics and global peace, stability, and security.

Continue Reading

Middle East

Regional Connectivity in the Gulf Cooperation Council



The Gulf Cooperation Council consists of a region of some of the most formidable economies in the world that enjoy vast oil and gas reserves which have brought them immense wealth. The GCC have combined oil reserves of about 497 billion barrels which is 34% of the world’s supply, according to King Abdullah Petroleum Studies and Research Center. However, these countries also share similar problems, which have become increasingly apparent with the fluctuation and gradual decline in global oil prices as well as the impacts of climate change. Since gulf countries share similar economic issues, it means that they should take collaborative efforts to curb these problems as well. Enhancing regional connectivity is one way to achieve this. It will help improve the economies of all GCC member states in the future and allow them to connect with larger markets.

Over the years, several steps have been taken by gulf countries to improve regional connectivity. For instance, since 1980s, there have been plans and several attempts to create a common GCC currency termed as Khaleeji or Dinar. The currency is expected to be valued at around 1 USD = 1.984 KHJ. Although since then, Oman and the UAE have withdrawn from the plans until further notice, this idea still enjoys popularity and GCC governments are still considering it. The region already meets many of the necessary criteria for a common currency as all seven of the countries have very similar economies, values, cultures, and histories. A common currency would bolster trade flows between the countries by removing border barriers, which will result in cheaper goods and services, particularly of healthcare, tourism, and education, and economic well-being of all the countries involved as a result of increased regional connectivity. A common gulf currency would also reduce exchange-rate uncertainties. Tourists and citizens would not need to constantly exchange currencies when visiting different countries in the region. A common currency will also reduce barriers for the transfer of people between gulf countries which will make it easy to exchange skilled labour, thus decreasing unemployment overall and also producing more opportunities for highly educated domestic workers being produced every year. It will also lead to greater economic integration in the GCC as regional connectivity grows stronger. 

GCC countries have also begun to seriously explore strengthening transport links. After careful thought and deliberation, gulf countries have agreed to build a 2177km GCC railway in 2009 stretching from Kuwait, entering Saudi Arabia, connecting Bahrain as well as Qatar, then moving through the UAE and ending in Oman. The railway will also connect vast networks of existing and planned railway networks in Saudi Arabia, the UAE, Qatar, and Oman, further improving regional connectivity in the gulf. The project is expected to be completed by 2025 and is expected to drastically improve trade costs, travel times, and connectivity between ports and cities. It will boost trade flows across the bloc and attract foreign direct investment. The GCC also aims to establish a common market and joint Customs union to further strengthen regional connectivity, which will result in greater economic growth and integration. The Saudis have already started expanding their already vast network of railway tracks. They have completed the al-Qurayyat station which connects Riyadh to Jordan and the rest of northern Saudi Arabia, stretching across 1215km. Moreover, the kingdom completed the Haramain speed train at Rabigh Station which connects the Holy cities of Makkah and Madinah through a 450 km track. The UAE has also expanded its existing railway infrastructure, especially with a national rail network connecting 11 cities with trains travelling 200km per hour. Moreover, the Qataris have also built an extensive railway network as part of their efforts to organize the FIFA World Cup last year which consists of 26 projects. These railway lines will be connected with the GCC railway and they will boost regional connectivity in the region, facilitating the transport of people, information, and goods.

Other measures that the GCC could take to enhance regional connectivity would be to take steps to incorporate long term strategies of each member. All GCC member states have similar long-term goals as outlined by Saudi Vision 2030, Bahrain Vision 2030, Kuwait Vision 2035, UAE Vision 2030, Qatar Vision 2030, and Oman Vision 2040. The crux of these plans is to rid GCC states of oil dependence, combat climate change, and increase tourism and entertainment for more economic diversification. Integrating these efforts will increase collaboration, which will duly increase regional connectivity, resulting in more efficient execution of these plans. Moreover, other approaches include easing or eliminating border restrictions to enable free movement between GCC states for citizens and tourists. A major factor limiting trade is border restrictions as trade is less likely to happen if there is a border in between, even if the distance is negligible. If border restrictions are eliminated, then trade will become more frequent and there will be greater regional connectivity between adjacent countries. Furthermore, tourists will also be able to easily access other GCC member states and hence spend more money, cross border competition between markets would also increase, leading to more competitive prices, and finally, it will also reduce price differentials for people who live in areas that are near borders.

For this to happen, GCC countries need to improve diplomatic relations among themselves. This is particularly true after the diplomatic tensions between Qatar and Saudi Arabia between 2017 and 2021 which had forced the GCC nation to seek reroute flights and vessels. Such diplomatic crises will harm prospects for regional connectivity in the GCC and therefore need to be avoided. Moreover, the GCC’s economic growth is expected only at 3.2%, which is much lower than the 7.3% figure estimated in 2022. The figure is also a decline from the 5.8% growth in 2022. Furthermore, oil prices had been declining since many years, which poses a danger to the economies of the GCC. Although a cut in output by OPEC+ member states will boost oil prices in the short-run (they already helped oil prices cross $80 per barrel), this is not sustainable for the GCC economies. Therefore, GCC countries face a range of serious challenges when it comes to regional connectivity. However, the opportunities far outweigh the challenges and the GCC enjoys potential to become an economic powerhouse in the region.

Continue Reading



Health & Wellness4 hours ago

Scientists remain vigilant for new Covid-19 variants while improving the ability to predict complications

Regular life may have resumed for most people, but the pandemic rumbles on as researchers keep a watch on new...

World News5 hours ago

“Global Times”: China-Russia cooperation is broader than what US-led West can envision

On the afternoon of May 24, Chinese President Xi Jinping met with Prime Minister of the Russian Federation Mikhail Mishustin,...

Tech News5 hours ago

Driving Towards Safety: Cutting-Edge Technologies to Mitigate Road Accident Severity in the USA

The US communications regulator has recently granted permission for the use of the mobility platform cellular-vehicle-to everything (C-V2X) on American...

South Asia10 hours ago

International Peacekeeping Day: Pakistan’s Case

29th May marks the 75th anniversary of International Peacekeeping Day. In conflict studies, Peacekeeping as term defines those activities and...

Americas12 hours ago

Of course, the “Unipolar Party” is over

On the right side of the Pacific, the U.S. media is eagerly asking as many scholars as possible whether the...

South Asia14 hours ago

Striving for Balance: Pakistan’s Climate Equity Drive

The world’s population of 1.8 billion people between the ages of 10 and 24 represents the largest group of young...

Energy17 hours ago

Strategic Partnership Opportunities among ASEAN countries towards Renewable Energy

Quoting from Singapore’s Prime Minister, Lee Hsien Loong, during his plenary speech at the 42nd ASEAN Summit in Labuan Bajo...