Connect with us


Attempting Diplomacy in a World Obsessed with Labels



Diplomacy. The word itself sounds somewhat tranquil, if not downright peace-inducing. Diplomacy is supposed to be at the heart of all international relations regardless of any particular nations that might be involved in political discourse. Unfortunately, diplomacy has many enemies. One of the most prominent is humanity’s obsession with labels.

During the four years of Donald Trump’s presidency, the US was often referred to as a fascist country. In fact, some scholars still describe both the US and UK as practitioners of imperial fascism. Meanwhile, scholars and pundits with a more conservative bent freely throw around the terms ‘socialism’ and ‘communism’.

What do so many labels do to diplomacy? They encourage diplomats to form opinions of other diplomats and the countries they represent long before any sort of interaction takes place. With opinions formed and strategies formulated, diplomats are unable to go to the negotiating table with a completely unbiased mindset.

Lenin, Socialism, and Communism

Marxist Vladimir Lenin was rather outspoken about his views of both socialism and communism. Unfortunately, he did not provide clear definitions of either one. To this day he is credited with saying that “the goal of socialism is communism”, though there is no proof he said it.

There is also no proof that Lenin believed socialised medicine was the foundation of a communist state. He is quoted as saying so, but there is no evidence he said any such thing. Why does this matter? Because people use these sorts of assertions as a basis for defining socialism, communism, and the relationship between the two.

To the pure capitalist, both socialism and communism are evils that must be purged from the earth. With such a mindset, it becomes easy to brand anyone with whom you disagree as a socialist or communist. People do it all the time.

Controlling the Means of Production

Though communism and socialism have never enjoyed hard-and-fast definitions across the entire political and economic spectrum, many people believe the differences boil down to the means of production. As the thinking goes, the socialist model encourages the private sector and government to collectively control the means of production and distribution.

The communist model dispenses with public-private cooperation to vest all control in the hands of a strong central government. In a communist state, the government ultimately controls everything. Knowing that, is China a socialist or communist country? Before you answer, do a little research. You’ll find the lines are a lot more blurry than you previously suspected.

The US, UK, and Fascism

On the other end of the label spectrum is fascism. Opponents of conservative politics love to throw this term around just as much as conservatives bandy about socialism and communism. But just what is fascism? The Cambridge Dictionary defines it as “a political system based on a very powerful leader, state control, and being extremely proud of country and race, and in which political opposition is not allowed.”

There is no doubt that both Donald Trump and Boris Johnson are nationalists. They are proud of their countries and have a tendency to put them first. Are they fascists? Are their nations fascist?

If you follow the Cambridge Dictionary definition, you have to say that they are not. The conditions of powerful ruler, state control, and no tolerance for political opposition settle the question. Donald Trump was an immensely powerful leader while he occupied the White House. But he was not a dictator. The laws of America’s representative republic prevailed for the entire four years of his presidency.

Likewise, Britain’s Parliament didn’t dissolve when Boris Johnson became prime minister. Johnson’s government does not exercise strong state control to the exclusion of MPs and the courts. Political opposition is not only allowed, but it is also encouraged.

WWII Germany and Italy

By contrast, both Germany and Italy operated under a fascist system during World War II. In fact, fascism gave rise to that war. In both cases, you had very strong leaders and strong state control. Political opposition was absolutely not allowed.

Compare the US under Donald Trump to Germany under Adolf Hitler. Compare the UK under Boris Johnson to Italy under Benito Mussolini. There really is no comparison in either case. Labelling the UK and US as imperialistic, fascist countries is both a violation of the terms and a disservice to their political ideals.

Disagreeing Without Attacking

The lesson in all of this is demonstrated in the concept of disagreeing without attacking one another. And right now, it is a lesson the world desperately needs to take stock of. Like so much hazard signage warning of dangers in the workplace, today’s political vitriol is a warning sign that bad things may be on the way.

The Western world can disagree with the Middle East and its seeming inability to find a lasting peace without the two sides verbally attacking one another at every turn. The US doesn’t need to continue sparring with North Korea any more than China needs to continue provoking the US.

When individuals assign labels to others, transparent interactions are immediately hindered. The same is true for countries. When one country assumes to know another country well enough to slap a label on it, that first country has already determined the second country’s position. How can the two have reasonable diplomatic relations if their labels are at opposite sides of the spectrum?

Actions More Important Than Philosophies

Labels are nothing more than words used to quantify what is often not quantifiable. In the end, they do not matter. They also do more damage than good. What really matters are actions. Indeed, actions are more important than political philosophy.

There will always be nations that lean more to the conservative side. Likewise, there will always be those that lean toward the liberal side. That has been the story of history thus far. It will continue to be the way of the future. If we are to keep the world at relative peace and stability, we must all recognise the fact that political philosophies are not going to change. Instead, we need to be better at diplomacy.

The best kind of diplomacy dispenses with labels. It doesn’t go to the table with preconceived notions and settled expectations. The best diplomacy grants all of those at the table the benefit of the doubt. It seeks to find common ground wherever it exists.

Ultimately, effective diplomacy rests on mutual respect. Political leaders do not have to agree on philosophy to show that respect. Yet that respect cannot be present where labels exist. Until we dispense with the labels and take those with whom we disagree at face value, nothing will change.

Continue Reading


Biden-Putting meeting: Live from Geneva



19:00 The places of the flags on the Mont Blanc bridge on which President Biden and President Putin will pass to reach the meeting venue on Wednesday usually hold the flags of the different Swiss cantons. Not today. The American and Russian flags have been placed to welcome the two leaders. 

18:00 A day before the Geneva summit: Hotel Intercontinental where the American delegation and probably President Biden himself is staying, how the city looks like a day before the meeting, what are the security measures like, why isn’t the UN involved and are the usual protests expected?

Iveta Cherneva with live video political commentary from Geneva one day ahead of the Biden-Putin Summit

Continue Reading


Will the promotion of cricket in GCC add to its Soft Power?



In recent years, Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC) countries, have been trying to bolster their ‘Soft Power’ in a number of ways; by promoting tourism, tweaking their immigration policies to attract more professionals and foreign students and focusing on promoting art and culture. The United Arab Emirates (UAE) has taken the lead in this direction (in May 2017, UAE government set up a UAE Soft Power Council which came up with a comprehensive strategy for the promotion of the country’s Soft Power). Under Crown Prince Mohammad Bin Salman (MBS), Saudi Arabia has also been seeking to change its international image, and it’s Vision 2030 seeks to look beyond focusing on economic growth. In the Global Soft Power Index 2021, Saudi Arabia was ranked at number 24 and number 2 in the Gulf region after the UAE (the country which in the past had a reputation for being socially conservative, has hosted women’s sports events and also hosted the G20 virtually last year)

Will the promotion of cricket in GCC add to its Soft Power?

   One other important step in the direction of promoting Soft Power in the GCC, is the attempt to popularize cricket in the Gulf. While the Sharjah cricket ground (UAE)  hosted many ODI (One Day International )tournaments, and was witness to a number of thrillers between India and Pakistan, match fixing allegations led to a ban on India playing cricket at non-regular venues for a duration of 3 years (for a period of 7 years from 2003, Sharjah did not get to host any ODI). The Pakistan cricket team has been playing its international home series at Sharjah, Abu Dhabu and Dubai for over a decade (since 2009) and the sixth season of the Pakistan Super League is also being played in UAE. Sharjah has also hosted 9 test matches (the first of which was played in 2002).

 Sharjah hosted part of the Indian Premier League (IPL) tournament in 2014, and last year too the tournament was shifted to UAE due to covid19 (apart from Sharjah, matches were played at Dubai and Abu Dhabi). This year again, the UAE and possibly Oman are likely to host the remaining matches of the IPL which had to be cancelled due to the second wave of Covid19. The ICC Men’s T20 World Cup to be held later this year (October-November 2021), which was actually to be hosted by India,  could also be hosted not just in the UAE, but Oman as well (there are two grounds, one of them has floodlights). International Cricket Council (ICC) is looking for an additional venue to UAE, because a lot of cricket is being played there, and this may impact the pitches. The ICC while commenting on the possibility of the T20 World cup being hosted in the Middle East said:

, “The ICC Board has requested management [to] focus its planning efforts for the ICC Men’s  T20 World Cup 2021 on the event being staged in the UAE with the possibility of including another venue in the Middle East’

GCC countries are keen not just to host cricketing tournaments, but also to increase interest in the game. While Oman has a team managed by an Indian businessman, Saudi Arabia has set up the SACF (Saudi Arabian Cricket Federation) in 2020 and it has started the National Cricket Championship which will have more than 7,000 players and 36 teams at the school level. Peshawar Zalmi, a Pakistani franchise T20 cricket team, representing the city of Peshawar the capital of Khyber Pakhtunkhwa, which plays in the Pakistan’s domestic T20 cricket league – the Peshawar cricket league —  extended an invitation to the SACF, to play a friendly match against it. It’s owner Javed Afridi had extended the invitation to the Saudi Arabian team in April 2021.  Only recently, Chairman of SACF Prince Saud bin Mishal  met with India’s Ambassador to Saudi Arabia, Dr Ausaf Saeed, to discuss ways for promoting the game in Saudi Arabia. He also visited the ICC headquarters at Dubai and apart from meeting officials of ICC also took a tour of Sharjah cricket ground.

GCC countries have a number of advantages over other potential neutral venues. First, the required infrastructure is already in place in some countries, and there is no paucity of financial resources which is very important. Second, there is a growing interest in the game in the region, and one of the important factors for this is the sizeable South Asian expat population. Third, a number of former cricketers from South Asia are not only coaching cricket teams, but also being roped in to create more enthusiasm with regard to the game. Fourth, UAE along with other GCC countries, could also emerge as an important venue for the resumption of India-Pakistan cricketing ties.


In conclusion, if GCC countries other than UAE — like Saudi Arabia and Oman  — can emerge as important cricketing venues, their ‘Soft Power’ appeal is likely to further get strengthened especially vis-à-vis South Asia. South Asian expats, who have contributed immensely to the economic growth of the region, and former South Asian cricketers will have an important role to play in popularizing the game in the Gulf. Cricket which is already an important component of the GCC — South Asia relationship, could help in further strengthening people to people linkages.

Continue Reading


Analyzing the role of OIC




Composed of fifty-seven countries and spread over four continents, the Organization of Islamic Conference (OIC) is the second-largest intergovernmental body following the United Nations (UN). And it is no secret that the council was established in the wake of an attack on the Al-Aqsa Mosque in Jerusalem. Safeguarding and defending the national sovereignty, independence, and territorial integrity of its member states is the significant provision of the OIC’s charter. OIC charter also undertakes to strengthen the bond of unity and solidarity among member states. Uplifting Islamic values, practicing cooperation in every sphere among its members, contributing to international peace, protecting the Islamic sites, and assisting suppressed Muslim community are other significant features of its charter. 

Recently, the world witnessed the 11-days long conflict between Hamas and Israel. In a recent episode of the clash between two parties, Israel carried out airstrikes on Gaza, claiming many innocent Palestinian lives. The overall death toll in the territory rose to 200, including 59 children and 35 women, with 1305 injured, says Hamas-run health ministry. This event was met with resentment from people across the world, and they condemned Israeli violence. After 11 days of violence, the Israeli government and Hamas agreed to a ceasefire. The event of Israeli violence on Palestinians has called the role of OIC into question. The council, formed in the aftermath of the onslaught on Al-Aqsa mosque, seemed to adopt a lip service approach to the conflict. However, the call for stringent measures against Israeli aggression by the bloc was not part of its action. 

Likewise, the Kashmir issue, which has witnessed atrocities of Indians on innocent Kashmiris, looks up to the OIC for its resolution. Last year, during the 47th session of the Council of Foreign Ministers (CFM) in Niamey, Niger, the CFM reaffirmed its strong support for the Kashmir cause. The OIC categorically rejected illegal and unilateral actions taken by India on August 5 to change the internationally recognized disputed status of the Indian Illegally Occupied Jam­mu and Kashmir and demanded India rescind its illegal steps. However, the global community seems to pay deaf ears to the OIC’s resolution. The Kashmir issue and the Palestine issue are the core issues of the world that are witnessing the worst humanitarian crisis. And the charter of the bloc that aims to guard the Muslim ummah’s interest rings hollow. About a year ago, the event that made rounds on electronic and social media was the occurring of the KL summit, which reflected another inaction of the OIC. The move of influential Muslim countries (Iran, Turkey, and Indonesia), to sail on the idea to establish another forum to counter the OIC, manifested the rift in the bloc.  

Many OIC countries are underdeveloped and poorly governed and are home to instability, violence, and terrorism. The consequences of the violence and terrorism in the OIC countries have been devastating. According to Forbes, 7 out of 10 countries, which suffer most from terrorism are OIC members. The Syrian conflict is another matter of concern in the Mideast, looking up to OIC for a way out. An immense number of people have lost their lives in the Civil war in Syria.

Several factors contribute to the inefficiency of the bloc. The first and foremost reason is the Saudi-Iran stalemate. Influential regional powers (Iran and the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia) in the Mideast share strained links following the Islamic Revolution in Iran. Both sides dissent each other on many fronts. Saudi Arabia accuses Tehran of interfering in its internal affairs, using terrorism as a tool to intimidate neighbors, fuelling sectarianism, and equipping proxies to de-stabilize and overthrow the legitimate government. Locked in a proxy war in the Mideast, the KSA and Iran vie for regional dominance. Moreover, Iran’s nuclear program is met with strong resentment in the KSA since it shifts the Balance of Power towards Iran. Such developments play a vibrant role in their stalemate, and the bloc’s effectiveness is hostage to the Saudi-Iran standoff.

Political and social exclusion in many OIC states is the norm of the day, contributing to upheaval and conflict. In OIC countries, the level of political participation and political and social integration is weak. This fact has rendered OIC countries vulnerable to unrest. Arab Spring in 2011 stands as the best example. Furthermore, conflicts, since the mid-1990s, have occurred in weak states that have encountered unrest frequently. 

Saudi Arabia has tightened its grip on the OIC. The reason being, the OIC secretariat and its subsidiary bodies are in the KSA. More importantly, the KSA’s prolific funding to the bloc enhances its influence on the bloc. One example includes, in the past, the KSA barred an Iranian delegation from the OIC meeting in Jeddah. Saudi authorities have not issued visas for the Iranian participants, ministry spokesman, says Abbas Mousavi. “The government of Saudi Arabia has prevented the participation of the Iranian delegation in the meeting to examine the deal of the century plan at the headquarters of the Organization of Islamic Cooperation,” Mousavi said, the Fars news agency reported. Given the Iranian growing influence and its access to nuclear capabilities, the KSA resorted to using financial leverage to reap support from Arab countries against Iran. For instance, in past, Somalia and several other Arab states such as Sudan and Bahrain received a commitment of financial aid from Saudi Arabia on the same day they cut ties with Iran. Furthermore, the summits of OIC, GCC, and Arab League are perceived as an effort by Saudi Arabia to amass support against Tehran. 

Division in the Muslim world and their clash of interests is yet another rationale behind its inefficacy. These days, many Muslim countries are bent on pursuing their interests rather than paying commitment to their principles, that is, working collectively for the upkeep of the Muslim community. Last year, the governments of Israel and the United Arab Emirates (UAE) announced that they had agreed to the full normalization of relations. Following this, the Kingdom of Bahrain became another Muslim country to normalize its links with Israel. Such moves by the Islamic countries weaken the OIC agenda against Israel. 

OIC’s efficacy would be a distant dream unless the Saudi-Iran deadlock finds its way. For this purpose, Pakistan can play a vital role in mediating between these two powers. Pakistan has always been an active player in the OIC and played its role in raising its voice against Islamophobia, Palestine Issue, and the Kashmir issue. Shunning their interests and finding the common goals of the Muslim ummah, should be the utmost priority for the members of the bloc. Every OIC member ought to play its part in the upkeep of the bloc. Furthermore, a split in the bloc should come to an end since it leads to the polarization of member states towards regional powers. Many OIC countries are rich in hydrocarbons (a priceless wealth, which is the driver for the growth of a country); if all OIC members join hands and enhance their partnership in this sphere they can fight against energy security. And OIC is the crux for magnifying cooperation among its member states to meet their energy needs.

In this era of globalization, multilateralism plays a pivotal part. No one can deny the significance of intergovernmental organizations since they serve countries in numerous ways. In the same vein, OIC can serve Muslim ummah in multiple ways; if it follows a course of adequate functioning.

Continue Reading