Connect with us
modi macron modi macron

South Asia

The many facets of the bond that held India and France together in 2020

Published

on

By all means, 2020 was an exceptionally memorable year for the special friendship and the 22-year-old ‘strategic partnership’ between India and France, ranging from the political and diplomatic levels to cooperation in defence and space sectors. Here, I explore how.

Unprecedented joint patrols in the Indian Ocean in February

The story of Indo-French cooperation in 2020 began with a coordinated patrol (CORPAT) by the Indian and French navies, decided in the previous year, operating from the French island of Reunion in the western Indian Ocean for the first time, in February, focusing on the stretch between the East African coastline and the Strait of Malacca. Until that point, India has engaged in such joint patrols only with its Asian maritime neighbours and had rejected a similar offer made by the US, which operates a base in Diego Garcia, before.

India’s entry to the Francophone Indian Ocean Commission (IOC) as observer in March

The 1982-established, Mauritius-headquartered Indian Ocean Commission (IOC) is the oldest region-specific grouping of five nations in the western section of the Indian Ocean comprising of Mauritius, Seychelles, Comoros, Madagascar and France (Reunion), all French-speaking and the organisation is mainly led by France.

India, geographically closer to maritime South and Southeast Asia, had to wait till 2020, despite being a regional power on its own terms and a widely-accepted ‘first responder’ in the Indian Ocean Region, to get admitted to the IOC as an observer along with Japan and the United Nations. Notably, China has been an observer since 2016.

The island-states in the western Indian Ocean, closer to Eastern African coastline, bear a French colonial past and speak French. India has always concentrated its multilateral diplomatic engagements in the region with the Indian Ocean Rim Association (IORA), established in 1997.

The overseas department of Reunion, that largely justifies French presence in the region, is not just any other far-away territory of France, but it is rather the closest slice of France and Europe for India in its own backyard, the Indian Ocean.

Renowned journalist and writer of Asian affairs, Bertil Linter, write about the island of Reunion, “Everyone here is a French citizen and the island is part of the European Union. The currency is the Euro and the flags of France and the EU flutter over government buildings … people vote in French elections. The nine-hour flight from this island in the Indian Ocean to Paris is considered domestic…” 

This makes France an important power in the Indian Ocean and the Indo-Pacific. By combining all its overseas territories and departments, France has the largest exclusive economic zone (EEZ) in the world, of which 90% lies in the Indo-Pacific region.

India’s observer status at the IOC since March, apparently materialised with French support, opens up a wide range of new possibilities for maritime cooperation between these two maritime powers.

India’s heroic welcome for French-made Rafale fighter jets in July

In spite of all domestic controversies in India surrounding the purchase and deal-making of the Rafale fighter jets, the first batch of these combat-proven aircrafts, made by the French aerospace company Dassault Aviation, arrived in the northern Indian air base of Ambala in July, it was received with a heroic welcome.

It was also the time when the tensions with China in the high Himalayas were at a new high following a border skirmish that occurred in the previous month killing 20 Indian soldiers. The optics were so high in India, in particular, as the public started to see France as a mighty friend on India’s side against any more potential Chinese misadventure.

The second batch of aircrafts arrived in November, and a total of 36 Rafale omnirole fighter jets would be handed over to India by mid-2022 under a deal signed in 2016 amounting to nearly 600 billion Indian rupees.

Visit of the French Defence Minister to India in September

In her third official visit to India since 2017, France’s Defence Minister, Florence Parly, personally showed up in India in September, amid the pandemic, to attend the operational induction ceremony of the first batch of the Rafales by the Indian Air Force, further strengthening military-to-military partnership between the two countries.

During the ceremony, the French Minister said France has always stood beside India both through good and bad times and reinforced willingness to cooperate in maritime, air, space, and cyber domains and in the wider Indo-Pacific region, of which France is also a major power, by virtue of its presence in the western Indian Ocean. Today, France considers India as its foremost Asian strategic partner.

India’s support for France following multiple terror incidents in France in October

Narendra Modi was the first non-Western world leader to openly support French President Emmanuel Macron in his efforts to tackle the threat posed by jihadist radicalisation and extremism within France, following the brutal killings by beheading and stabbing that occurred in the French cities of Paris and Nice in October.

Even before, the personal bon-homie between the two leaders was at full display during Modi’s France visit in August, last year and during Macron’s India visit in March 2018. The fact that both countries face the common threat of jihadi terror brings them closer to cooperate in counter-terrorism and security.

Rising cooperation between the French and Indian space agencies

In September 2020, French space agency CNES (National Centre for Space Studies) has confirmed that France will take part in the Venus mission of the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), scheduled for 2025, and for the first time a French payload will be flown on an Indian exploration mission.

This comes as a result of the Joint Vision for Space Cooperation agreed between India and France two years back, in 2018. France has also assured its support for India’s first human space flight mission, Gaganyaan, planned for 2022, including by arranging special training programmes and by offering other kinds of technical support.

Time-tested partners – a look back

France’s history of diplomatic engagement with India begins right at the year of India’s independence in 1947. It voluntarily ceded its former colonial possessions in southern India to India in 1962 by a treaty.

In 1998, when India declared itself a nuclear state following a planned and overseen atomic bomb explosion in the desert of northwestern state of Rajasthan, France was among the very few countries that restrained from condemning it and in the same year, the relationship with India was upgraded to a ‘strategic partnership’, in a recognition of India’s rationale for a credible nuclear deterrent to discourage an attack from its hostile neighbours to the east and west.

The following years saw cooperation between both countries in the fields of space, defence and civil nuclear trade. In 2008, France and India signed an agreement for civil nuclear cooperation.

In 2009, the Indian armed forces even participated in the French national day parade in Paris, the first time an Indian military contingent registered their presence in the national day parade of another country.

In 2018, during Macron’s visit to India, both countries agreed to improve the interoperability of each other’s military bases and to expand the operational reach of each other’s armed forces by signing the Agreement for the Provision of Reciprocal Logistics Support.

Being a permanent member at the UN Security Council holding the veto-power, France has supported India’s stand at the world body on multiple occasions such as turning the tables on a China-sponsored closed-door meeting on Jammu and Kashmir in India’s favour in 2019. Paris has also backed a UN resolution on designating Pakistan-based jihadi leader Masood Azhar as a global terrorist.

Today, France’s support for India and vice-versa goes beyond the security domain to economic, educational and cultural levels. Paris supports New Delhi’s bid for membership at the elite Nuclear Suppliers Group, and also for permanent membership at the UN Security Council. This special partnership of two key civilizational states and democracies is expected only to get strengthened further in the years to come.

Bejoy Sebastian is an independent journalist based in India who regularly writes, tweets, and blogs on issues relating to international affairs and geopolitics, particularly of the Asia-Pacific region. He also has an added interest in documentary photography. Previously, his bylines have appeared in The Diplomat, The Kochi Post, and Delhi Post.

Continue Reading
Comments

South Asia

India’s Unclear Neighbourhood Policy: How to Overcome ?

Published

on

India has witnessed multiple trends with regards to its relations with its neighbours at a time vaccine diplomacy is gaining prominence and Beijing increasing the pace towards becoming an Asian superpower, whereby making these reasons valid for New Delhi to have a clear foreign policy with respect to its neighbourhood.

Introduction

The Covid Pandemic has led to increased uncertainty in the global order where it comes to power dynamics, role of international organisations. New Delhi has tried to leave no stone unturned when it comes to dealing with its immediate neighbours.  It has distributed medical aid and vaccines to smaller countries to enhance its image abroad at a time it has witnessed conflicts with China and a change in government in Myanmar. These developments make it imperative for New Delhi to increase its focus on regionalism and further international engagement where this opportunity could be used tactically amidst a pandemic by using economic and healthcare aid.

According to Dr. Arvind Gupta, New Delhi has to deal with threats coming from multiple fronts and different tactics where it is essential for New Delhi to save energy using soft means rather than coercive measures.. India under Vaccine Maitri has supplied many of COVAXIN doses to Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka where many have appreciated this move. The urgency of ensuring humanitarian aid during these periods of unprecedented uncertainty are essential in PM Modi’s Security and Growth For All ( SAGAR) initiative, which focusses on initiating inclusive growth as well as cooperation in the Indian Ocean Region.

This pandemic witnessed various threats coming in India’s neighbourhood through multiple dimensions which include maritime, land, cyber as well as air threats where adversaries are using these to put pressure on New Delhi to settle land as well as marine disputes as per their terms.  These encirclement strategies have made it necessary for India to open up various options such as holding maritime joint exercises with like-minded countries, developing partnerships, providing economic as well as healthcare support to weaker countries plus having a clear insight about changing global dynamics and acting as per them.

This piece will discuss about various changing tactics, pros and cons which India has with respect to developing its national security vis-à-vis its neighbourhood, why should it prioritise its neighbourhood at the first place?

Background

India’s Neighbourhood is filled with many complexities and a lot of suspicion amongst countries, some viewing India because of its size and geography plus economic clout as a bully where it is wanting to dominate in the region putting others aside. This led to New Delhi play an increased role in nudging ties first with its neighbours with whom it had multiple conflicts as well as misunderstandings leading to the latter viewing Beijing as a good alternative in order to keep India under check.

Ever since PM Modi has taken charge at 7 RCR, India’s Neighbourhood First Policy has been followed increasingly to develop relations, to enhance understandings and ensure mutual cooperation as well as benefit with its neighbours. The relations with Islamabad have not seen so much improvement as compared to other leaders in the past. Even though former Prime Minister Nawaz Sharif was invited for PM Modi’s 1st Swearing In ceremony in 2014, terrorist activities have never stopped which could be seen through Pathankot, Uri and Pulwama terror attacks which killed many of the Indian soldiers. Even though surgical strikes were conducted on terror camps in retaliation to these bombardments, Islamabad has not changed its heart at all about its security or regional demands. New strategies and friendships are being developed where Beijing has played a major role in controlling power dynamics.

The Belt and Road initiative, first time mentioned during President Xi’s 2013 speech in Kazakhstan, then officially in 2015,  lays emphasis of achieving a Chinese Dream of bringing countries under one umbrella, ensuring their security, providing them with infrastructure projects such as ports, railways, pipelines, highways etc. The main bottleneck is the China Pakistan Economic Corridor when it comes to India’s security threats, passing through disputed boundaries of Gilgit and Baltistan in Pakistan Occupied Kashmir till Gwadar. Other projects have been initiated in Chittagong, Hambantota, Gwadar , Kyapkyou. These projects form a String Of Pearls in the Indo Pacific where New Delhi is being balanced against through economic plus development incentives being given to the member countries under the project. That’s why in the recent past, New Delhi is asserting its influence in the region, looking at new dimensional threats where Beijing’s threats in the maritime domain in the islands in East as well as South China seas are not being seen favourably in many countries such as ASEAN, US, Australia and Japan which is giving India an opportunity to look towards countries with a common threat. Amidst this great power struggle between Washington and Beijing, New Delhi is stuck between a rock and hard place i.e., having a clear and strong foreign policy with its neighbours.

In this region, India has a sole threat which is mainly Beijing where the latter has achieved prowess technologically and militarily where New Delhi lags behind the latter twenty fold. So, there is a need for improvising military technology, increase economic activities with countries, reduce dependence on foreign aid, ensure self-reliance.

Situation

South Asia is backward when it comes to economic development, human development and is a home to majority of the world’s population which lives below poverty line. The colonial rule has left a never-ending impact on divisions based on communal, linguistic and ethnic grounds. Even, in terms of infrastructure and connectivity, New Delhi lags behind Beijing significantly in the neighbourhood because the latter is at an edge when it comes to bringing countries under the same umbrella. Due to these, many initiatives have been taken up by New Delhi on developing infrastructure, providing humanitarian aid to needy countries.

There have been numerous efforts made by India with respect to reaching out to the Neighbours in 2020 through setting up of the SAARC Covid Fund where many Neighbourhood countries such as Nepal, Bangladesh and Sri Lanka gave contributions to ensure cooperation, joint scientific research, sharing information, healthcare kits where the countries contributed USD $ 18 million jointly towards this fund where New Delhi made an initial offer of USD $ 10 million.

New Delhi has even mustered ties with the Association of Southeast Asian countries during the pandemic under its Act East Policy where proper connectivity through the Northeast could be useful in easing movement of goods but currently, the infrastructure in Northeast needs more improvement where issues such as unemployment, poor connectivity are prevalent whereby disconnecting it from rest of the other states. This region could play an important role in linking Bangladesh, Myanmar to New Delhi along with the proposed India-Thailand –Myanmar Trilateral Corridor. Focus has also been laid to develop inland waterways, rail links and pipelines to ease connections between countries, making trade free and more efficient.

India is focussing on developing the Sittwe and Paletwa ports in Myanmar under the Kaladan Development Corridor, at the cost of INR 517.9 Crore in order to provide an alternative e route beneficial for the Northeast for getting shipping access

Summing Up

 These above developments and power display by a strong adversary, give good reasons for New Delhi to adopt collective security mechanisms through QUAD, SIMBEX and JIMEX with a common perception of having safe and open waters through abiding to the UNCLOS which China isn’t showing too much interest in, seen through surveillance units, artificial islands being set up on disputed territories which countries likewise India are facing in context to territorial sovereignty and integrity. These developments make it important for India to look at strategic threats by coming together with countries based on similar interest’s vis-à-vis Chinese threat.

There is a need for India to develop and harness its strength through connectivity and its self reliance initiative ( Aatmanirbharta ) so that there is no dependence on any foreign power at times of need . Proper coordination between policy makers and government officials could make decision making even easier, which is not there completely because of ideological differences, different ideas which makes it important for the political leadership to coordinate with the military jointly during times of threats on borders. Self-reliance could only come through preparedness and strategy.

Continue Reading

South Asia

India is in big trouble as UK stands for Kashmiris

Published

on

 A London-based law firm has filed an application with British police seeking the arrest of India’s army chief and a senior Indian government official over their alleged roles in war crimes in Indian-administered Kashmir.

Law firm Stoke White said it submitted extensive evidence to the Metropolitan Police’s War Crimes Unit on Tuesday, documenting how Indian forces headed by General Manoj Mukund Naravane and Home Affairs Minister Amit Shah were responsible for the torture, kidnapping and killing of activists, journalists and civilians – particularly Muslim – in the region.

“There is strong reason to believe that Indian authorities are conducting war crimes and other violence against civilians in Jammu and Kashmir,” the report states, referring to the territory in the Himalayan region.

Based on more than 2,000 testimonies taken between 2020 and 2021, the report also accused eight unnamed senior Indian military officials of direct involvement in war crimes and torture in Kashmir.

The law firm’s investigation suggested that the abuse has worsened during the coronavirus pandemic. It also included details about the arrest of Khurram Parvez, the region’s most prominent rights activist, by India’s counterterrorism authorities last year.

“This report is dedicated to the families who have lost loved ones without a trace, and who experience daily threats when trying to attain justice,” Khalil Dewan, author of the report and head of the SWI unit, said in a statement.

“The time has now come for victims to seek justice through other avenues, via a firmer application of international law.”

The request to London police was made under the principle of “universal jurisdiction”, which gives countries the authority to prosecute individuals accused of crimes against humanity committed anywhere in the world.

The international law firm in London said it believes its application is the first time that legal action has been initiated abroad against Indian authorities over alleged war crimes in Kashmir.

Hakan Camuz, director of international law at Stoke White, said he hoped the report would convince British police to open an investigation and ultimately arrest the officials when they set foot in the UK.

Some of the Indian officials have financial assets and other links to Britain.

“We are asking the UK government to do their duty and investigate and arrest them for what they did based on the evidence we supplied to them. We want them to be held accountable,” Camuz said.

The police application was made on behalf of the family of Pakistani prisoner Zia Mustafa, who, Camuz said, was the victim of extrajudicial killing by Indian authorities in 2021, and on behalf of human rights campaigner Muhammad Ahsan Untoo, who was allegedly tortured before his arrest last week.

Tens of thousands of civilians, rebels and government forces have been killed in the past two decades in Kashmir, which is divided between India and Pakistan and claimed by both in its entirety.

Muslim Kashmiris mostly support rebels who want to unite the region, either under Pakistani rule or as an independent country.

Kashmiris and international rights groups have long accused Indian troops of carrying out systematic abuse and arrests of those who oppose rule from New Delhi.

Rights groups have also criticized the conduct of armed groups, accusing them of carrying out human rights violations against civilians.

In 2018, the United Nations human rights chief called for an independent international investigation into reports of rights violations in Kashmir, alleging “chronic impunity for violations committed by security forces”.

India’s government has denied the alleged rights violations and maintains such claims are separatist propaganda meant to demonize Indian troops in the region. It seems, India is in big trouble and may not be able to escape this time. A tough time for Modi-led extremist government and his discriminatory policies. The world opinion about India has been changed completely, and it has been realized that there is no longer a democratic and secular India. India has been hijacked by extremist political parties and heading toward further bias policies. Minorities may suffer further, unless the world exert pressure to rectify the deteriorating human rights records in India.

Continue Reading

South Asia

S. Jaishankar’s ‘The India Way’, Is it a new vision of foreign policy?

Published

on

S. Jaishankar has had an illustrious Foreign Service career holding some of the highest and most prestigious positions such as ambassador to China and the US and as foreign secretary of India. Since 2019 he has served as India’s foreign minister. S. Jaishankar also has a Ph.D. in international relations from JNU and his academic background is reflected in this book.

His main argument is simplistic, yet the issues involved are complex. Jaishankar argues that the world is changing fundamentally, and the international environment is experiencing major shifts in power as well as processes. China is rising and western hegemony is declining. We are moving away from a unipolar system dominated by the US to a multipolar system. Globalization is waning and nationalism and polarization is on the rise (p. 29). The old order is going away but we cannot yet glimpse what the future will look like. This is the uncertain world that Dr. Jaishankar sees.

Dr. Jaishankar also argues that India too has changed, it is more capable and more assertive. The liberalization program that began in 1991 has made the Indian economy vibrant and globally competitive and it is well on track to becoming the third biggest economy in the world, after China and the US.  The war of 1971 that liberated Bangladesh, the liberalization of the economy after 1991, the nuclear tests in 1998 and the nuclear understanding with the US in 2005, Jaishankar argues are landmarks in India’s strategic evolution (p. 4). So given that both India and the system have changed, Jaishankar concludes, so should India’s foreign policy.

But his prescription for India’s foreign policy, in the grand scheme of things, is the same as before – India should remain nonaligned and not join the US in its efforts to contain China. India will try to play with both sides it seems in order to exploit the superpowers and maximize its own interests (p. 9). But he fails to highlight how India can find common ground with China other than to say the two nations must resolve things diplomatically. He also seems to think that the US has infinite tolerance for India’s coyness. In his imagination the US will keep making concessions and India will keep playing hard to get.

Jaishankar has a profound contradiction in his thinking. He argues that the future will be determined by what happens between the US and China. In a way he is postulating a bipolar future to global politics. But he then claims that the world is becoming multipolar and this he claims will increase the contests for regional hegemony. The world cannot be both bipolar and multipolar at the same time.

There is also a blind spot in Jaishankar’s book.  He is apparently unaware of the rise of Hindu nationalism and the demand for a Hindu state that is agitating and polarizing India’s domestic politics. The systematic marginalization and oppression of Muslim minorities at home and the growing awareness overseas of the dangers of Hindutva extremism do not exist in the world that he lives in. He misses all this even as he goes on to invoke the Mahabharata and argue how Krishna’s wisdom and the not so ethical choices during the war between Pandavas and Kauravas should be a guide for how India deals with this uncertain world – by balancing ethics with realism (p. 63). Methinks his little digression in discussing the ancient Hindu epic is more to signal his ideological predilections than to add any insights to understanding the world or India’s place in it.  

One aspect of his work that I found interesting is his awareness of the importance of democracy and pluralism. He states that India’s democracy garners respect and gives India a greater opportunity to be liked and admired by other nations in the world (p. 8). Yet recently when he was asked about the decline of India’s democratic credentials, his response was very defensive, and he showed visible signs of irritation. It is possible that he realizes India is losing ground internationally but is unwilling to acknowledge that his political party is responsible for the deterioration of India’s democracy.

This is also apparent when he talks about the importance of India improving its relations with its immediate neighbors. He calls the strategy as neighborhood first approach (pp. 9-10). What he does not explain is how an Islamophobic India will maintain good relations with Muslim majority neighbors like Bangladesh, Maldives, and Pakistan.

The book is interesting, it has its limitations and both, what is addressed and what is left out, are clearly political choices and provide insights into how New Delhi thinks about foreign policy. So, coming to the question with which we started, does India have a new foreign policy vision? The answer is no. Dr. Jaishankar is right, there is indeed an India way, but it is the same old way, and it entails remaining nonaligned with some minor attitudinal adjustments.  

Continue Reading

Publications

Latest

Trending