Connect with us

Science & Technology

The upcoming Space Activities Bill in India and what it needs to address

Published

on

In June, 2020, Jitendra Singh, Union Cabinet Minister of India announced that space exploration and certain space activities will be open to the private sector in India. Previously, Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO) was the only public organisation which launched satellites in space and planned missions for space exploration. Following the success of Private companies like SpaceX in the US, it is important for India to create favourable conditions for private companies to operate in the sector with limited regulations and clear laws.

On July 6, 2020, ISRO Chief, K Sivan announced that India would be coming up with a new Space policy and Space Activities Bill. Moreover, he added that the new bills would be more inclusive to the private sector. The Space Activities Bill is much awaited by enthusiasts of space exploration in India because it will clarify the rules and regulations associated with operating in the space sector. Being a high risk and a high investment sector, policies and frameworks for operating in this sector need to be clarified by the government to boost private investment.

Currently, India follows various peaceful international treaties signed worldwide. The Committee on the Peaceful Uses of Outer Space (“COPUOS”) largely determines Space policy in the international arena and ensures that no country is exploiting the usage of Space for personal interests. The Outer Space Treaty ensures that countries can explore space only for peaceful purposes and they cannot put any weapons of mass destruction in space. The policy however does not mention anything about the usage of conventional weapons in Space.

According to the Liability Convention, in case any country launches into space and damages the property in another country, it will be liable to pay reparations to the country which has faced the damages. With private players entering the market, it is not certain whether private companies or the government will bear the cost of any issues arising in liability from damage of international property. If the Indian government will bear the cost of damages created by a private property, the risk will be sufficiently large for the government. Hence, there is a need to reassess risk distribution for private players in India.

There is also a possibility that space objects created by private companies cause damage to Indian property itself. The government needs to clarify rules and regulations for various situations of possible damage created by private companies.

Taylor Wessing explains that “These rules are largely insufficient to cover all legal issues arising out of private activities in space” commenting on the international policy framework in reference to space exploration. It’s important to note that when most of the international treaties in space were signed, most countries did not allow private sector activity in space. Hence, the private sector was not taken into consideration during the formulation and signing of these treaties by the participants. With private sector activity in space, the government may need to give further clarifications about the impact that international treaties will have on domestic companies. Collaboration between international private companies will also need to be regulated by the government. International collaboration could create defence, commercial and scientific benefits for the world.

The Space Activities Bill needs to clearly address the role which the private sector will play in International Space Treaties and the liabilities associated with it. The space sector has limited accessibility because of the high costs involved for general audiences. As we create policies to increase equality worldwide, we also need to create policies which increase accessibility and inclusivity in space. With increased privatisation, there may be an increase in inequality in space exploration in the world.

In 2001, the first space tourist, U.S. millionaire Dennis Tito, was charged US$ 20 million to fly to the International Space Station. Hence, space may not be affordable to everyone because private companies will try to maximise their individual profits. Moreover, exploring space has mostly been under the domain of scientists, engineers, researchers and other people from STEM domains. Policies need to be created worldwide to answer the question – “Who gets to explore space first?”.

Space For Humanity, a non-profit organisation based out of the USA, is working towards increasing equality and inclusion in the area of space exploration. Space for Humanity’s mission is based on the concept of The Overview Effect, which explains the humbling effect which exploring space can have on people. Looking at Earth’s surface from the edge of Earth can make people realise their insignificance and interconnectedness. It prompts everyone experiencing Earth from Space, to see everyone on Earth as one, and create policies which are inclusive when they come back to Earth. Space For Humanity sponsors citizen flights to space for people all across the world without any discrimination based on race, nationality, gender, religion or any other factor.

Since, space as a field should be inclusive and open to everyone to explore, Non profit organisations like Space for Humanity play an important role in making space more equal and accessible for everyone, even in the Indian context. Indian private companies could partner with organisations like Space for Humanity to create a more inclusivity in space exploration for not just India, but other countries in the world.

India is at the brink of a dawn of a new era in the space sector. With the opportunity to create space policies which are unprecedented, India’s Space Activities Bill can be a precedent for various future bills in the sector created in Asia. As Indians look forward to the Space Activities Bill, we may see India’s own Elon Musk lurking by to revolutionise space travel in the world in the near future.

Vidhi Bubna is a freelance journalist from Mumbai who covers international relations, defence, diplomacy and social issues. Her current focus is on India-China relations.

Continue Reading
Comments

Science & Technology

What is a ‘vaccine passport’ and will you need one the next time you travel?

Published

on

An Arab-Israeli woman shows her COVID-19 card which shows she has been vaccinated against the virus. Mohamed Yassin

Is the idea of a vaccine passport entirely new?

The concept of a passport to allow for cross border travel is something that we’ve been working on with the Common Trust Network for many months. The focus has been first on diagnostics. That’s where we worked with an organization called “The Commons Project” to develop the “Common Trust Framework”. This is a set of registries of trusted data sources, a registry of labs accredited to run tests and a registry of up-to-date border crossing regulations.

The set of registries can be used to generate certificates of compliance to prevailing border-crossing regulations as defined by governments. There are different tools to generate the certificates, and the diversity of their authentication solutions and the way they protect data privacy is quite remarkable.

We at the Forum have no preference when it comes to who is running the certification algorithm, we simply want to promote a unique set of registries to avoid unnecessary replication efforts. This is where we support the Common Trust Framework. For instance, the Common Pass is one authentication solution – but there are others, for example developed by Abbott, AOK, SICPA (Certus), IBM and others.

How does the system work and how could it be applied to vaccines?

The Common Trust Network, supported by the Forum, is combining the set of registries that are going to enrol all participating labs. Separately from that, it provides an up-to-date database of all prevailing border entry rules (which fluctuate and differ from country to country).

Combining these two datasets provides a QR code that border entry authorities can trust. It doesn’t reveal any personal health data – it tells you about compliance of results versus border entry requirements for a particular country. So, if your border control rules say that you need to take a test of a certain nature within 72 hours prior to arrival, the tool will confirm whether the traveller has taken that corresponding test in a trusted laboratory, and the test was indeed performed less than three days prior to landing.

The purpose is to create a common good that many authentication providers can use and to provide anyone, in a very agnostic fashion, with access to those registries.

What is the WHO’s role?

There is currently an effort at the WHO to create standards that would process data on the types of vaccinations, how these are channelled into health and healthcare systems registries, the use cases – beyond the management of vaccination campaigns – include border control but also possibly in the future access to stadia or large events. By establishing in a truly ethical fashion harmonized standards, we can avoid a scenario whereby you create two classes of citizens – those who have been vaccinated and those who have not.

So rather than building a set of rules that would be left to the interpretation of member states or private-sector operators like cruises, airlines or conveners of gatherings, we support the WHO’s effort to create a standard for member states for requesting vaccinations and how it would permit the various kinds of use cases.

It is important that we rely on the normative body (the WHO) to create the vaccine credential requirements. The Forum is involved in the WHO taskforce to reflect on those standards and think about how they would be used. The WHO’s goal is to deploy standards and recommendations by mid-March 2021, and the hope is that they will be more harmonized between member states than they have been to date in the field of diagnostics.

What about the private sector and separate initiatives?

When registry frameworks are being developed for authentication tools providers, they should at a minimum feed as experiments into the standardization efforts being driven by WHO, knowing that the final guidance from the only normative body with an official UN mandate may in turn force those providers to revise their own frameworks. We certainly support this type of interaction, as public- and private-sector collaboration is key to overcoming the global challenge posed by COVID-19.

What more needs to be done to ensure equitable distribution of vaccines?

As the WHO has warned, vaccine nationalism – or a hoarding and “me-first” approach to vaccine deployment – risks leaving “the world’s poorest and most vulnerable at risk.”

COVAX, supported by the World Economic Forum, is coordinated by the World Health Organization in partnership with GAVI, the Vaccine Alliance; CEPI, the Centre for Epidemics Preparedness Innovations and others. So far, 190 economies have signed up.

The Access to COVID-19 Tools Accelerator (ACT-Accelerator) is another partnership, with universal access and equity at its core, that has been successfully promoting global collaboration to accelerate the development, production and equitable access to COVID-19 tests, treatments and vaccines. The World Economic Forum is a member of the ACT-Accelerator’s Facilitation Council (governing body).

World Economic Forum

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

Iran among five pioneers of nanotechnology

Published

on

Prioritizing nanotechnology in Iran has led to this country’s steady placement among the five pioneers of the nanotechnology field in recent years, and approximately 20 percent of all articles provided by Iranian researchers in 2020 are relative to this area of technology.

Iran has been introduced as the 4th leading country in the world in the field of nanotechnology, publishing 11,546 scientific articles in 2020.

The country held a 6 percent share of the world’s total nanotechnology articles, according to StatNano’s monthly evaluation accomplished in WoS databases.

There are 227 companies in Iran registered in the WoS databases, manufacturing 419 products, mainly in the fields of construction, textile, medicine, home appliances, automotive, and food.

According to the data, 31 Iranian universities and research centers published more than 50 nano-articles in the last year. 

In line with China’s trend in the past few years, this country is placed in the first stage with 78,000 nano-articles (more than 40 percent of all nano-articles in 2020), and the U.S. is at the next stage with 24,425 papers. These countries have published nearly half of the whole world’s nano-articles.

In the following, India with 9 percent, Iran with 6 percent, and South Korea and Germany with 5 percent are the other head publishers, respectively.

Almost 9 percent of the whole scientific publications of 2020, indexed in the Web of Science database, have been relevant to nanotechnology.

There have been 191,304 nano-articles indexed in WoS that had to have a 9 percent growth compared to last year. The mentioned articles are 8.8 percent of the whole produced papers in 2020.

Iran ranked 43rd among the 100 most vibrant clusters of science and technology (S&T) worldwide for the third consecutive year, according to the Global Innovation Index (GII) 2020 report.

The country experienced a three-level improvement compared to 2019.

Iran’s share of the world’s top scientific articles is 3 percent, Gholam Hossein Rahimi She’erbaf, the deputy science minister, has announced.

The country’s share in the whole publications worldwide is 2 percent, he noted, highlighting, for the first three consecutive years, Iran has been ranked first in terms of quantity and quality of articles among Islamic countries.

Sourena Sattari, vice president for science and technology has said that Iran is playing the leading role in the region in the fields of fintech, ICT, stem cell, aerospace, and is unrivaled in artificial intelligence.

From our partner Tehran Times

Continue Reading

Science & Technology

Free And Equal Internet Access As A Human Right

Published

on

Having internet access in a free and equal way is very important in contemporary world. Today, there are more than 4 billion people who are using internet all around the world. Internet has become a very important medium by which the right to freedom of speech and the right to reach information can be exercised. Internet has a central tool in commerce, education and culture.

Providing solutions to develop effective policies for both internet safety and equal Internet access must be the first priority of governments. The Internet offers individuals power to seek and impart information thus states and organizations like UN have important roles in promoting and protecting Internet safety. States and international organizations play a key role to ensure free and equal Internet access.

The concept of “network neutrality is significant while analyzing equal access to Internet and state policies regulating it. Network Neutrality (NN) can be defined as the rule meaning all electronic communications and platforms should be exercised in a non-discriminatory way regardless of their type, content or origin. The importance of NN has been evident in COVID-19 pandemic when millions of students in underdeveloped regions got victimized due to the lack of access to online education.

 Article 19/2 of the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights notes the following:

“Everyone shall have the right to freedom of expression; this right shall include freedom to seek, receive and impart information and ideas of all kinds, regardless of frontiers either orally, in writing or in print, in the form of art, or through any other media of his choice.”

Internet access and network neutrality directly affect human rights. The lack of NN undermines human rights and causes basic human right violations like violating freedom of speech and freedom to reach information. There must be effective policies to pursue NN. Both nation-states and international organizations have important roles in making Internet free, safe and equally reachable for the people worldwide. States should take steps for promoting equal opportunities, including gender equality, in the design and implementation of information and technology. The governments should create and maintain, in law and in practice, a safe and enabling online environment in accordance with human rights.

It is known that, the whole world has a reliance on internet that makes it easy to fullfill basic civil tasks but this is also threatened by increasing personal and societal cyber security threats. In this regard, states must fulfill their commitment to develop effective policies to attain universal access to the Internet in a safe way.

 As final remarks, it can be said that, Internet access should be free and equal for everyone. Creating effective tools to attain universal access to the Internet cannot be done only by states themselves. Actors like UN and EU have a major role in this process as well.

Continue Reading

Publications

Latest

Trending