In the 1940s, German expansionist missions over Belgium and France were raging. Moreover, the growth of the German military made Belgium alarmed. So on the Belgian-German border on the east side a magnificent fort was built, with bunkers and tunnels reaching 5 miles in length and below the ground depth of approximately 20 meters. The fort can accommodate 1500 Belgian troops at once. That is what we are familiar with the fortress of Eden Emael. Not only was the German military development at that time as the cause, based on history, when the first world war Belgium was occupied by Germany via Eden Emael as well, the eastern border of the two countries.
For Hitler, reoccupying Belgium meant breaking the superiority of fortress. But with the usual and standard attack style, of course, Germany will be overwhelmed, maybe even lost. Especially after the Versailes agreement, Germany was not permitted to have the large scale of air force and aircraft. Because of the agreement, Germany finally developed a type of glider that was rumored to be noiseless and suitable for sudden attacks with small numbers of troops.
Why? Because glider was not included in the type of aircraft that was prohibited in the Versailes agreement. In addition, Germany was also developing concave bombs, a kind of bombs that have targeted explosive power, only to hit certain targets, especially targets in the form of bunkers and underground fortresses. Air pressure caused by concave bombs will shake enemy bunkers from below, not from above. By placing concave bomb in one of the gaps in the bunker, the pressure will go through all the rooms in the bunker, then hit the cannon gun at the top of the bunker.
With the discovery of that technology, the Germans decided to attack the fortress of Eden Emael with special forces totaling 86 people. The decision was in accordance with the new war strategy set by Hitler, namely rapid occupation or what we commonly know as the Bliztkrieg. The time of the attack was determined at around 4am. When the operation came, German glider landed around the fortress of Emael carrying 86 German special forces. The number was clearly out of balance with Belgian soldiers who were waiting for them inside the fort, which were approximately 750 soldiers.
Not a long wait, all Nazi special forces took positions around the fortress, searching for entrances and installing concave bombs. The explosion of several concave bombs damaged many sides of the fort from the inside, because if the concave bomb exploded, the air pressure caused by them would bounce off one another from the walls of the fort, towards the holes that flowed air out, especially the holes which became the cannon position.
The sudden attack really surprised the Belgian. But because of the much larger number, Belgium finally put up a fight. But what a bitch, Belgium was beyond help. With the ruins of the fortress of Eden Emael due to surprise attack, then the help of the imminent German troops, the Fortress of Emael Eden had to bow down to the Nazis in only 28 hours. And Germany got a strategic starting point for occupying Belgium as a whole and entering France.
However, if seen more broadly, the German effort to enter Belgium by breaking the superiority of the Fortress of Emael was only camflation. The victory was truly celebrated by Berlin, videos of the victory at the fortress of Eden Emael were distributed. Everything was to cover the true intention of Germany, namely occupying Paris, France. Sure enough, shortly after the conquest of the Fortress of Emael, Germany finally conquered France, via a path that was never expected by all parties, namely through the dense forest of the Ardennes, which became a barrier between Germany and France.
German troops made it through the dense forest on foot, with a journey of more than 170 km in more than two weeks. Even more interesting, it turns out that the number of French and Belgian troops at that time was somewhat greater than the troops sent down by Hitler. Amazingly, after a long, tiring, sleepless journey, they were able to conquer opponents whose resting patterns would be far better. Why? The answer was in the Pervitin Pill.
Pervitin Pills are another language of Crystal Met. In 1938s, the pharmaceutical company Themmler was licensed to produce the Pervitin trademark. The packaging was very similar to the packaging of one of the multivitamins sold, in the form of a long can of small pills containing several pills. Pervitin was sold as an antidepressant. Initially, the initial inventors who later became the Pervitin pill were two Japanese researchers studying in Berlin. They found the crystal meth. After that, Themmler got permission to produce and sell it throughout Germany.
Pervitin finally attracted the attention of Doctor Otto Angke, doctor and medical scientist in the German military. Otto then tested 90 selected students. The conclusion was that the use of Pervitin would provide chemical benefits for the fighting endurance of German army. Soldiers will keep fighting without sleep for days, even welcoming the war very hysterically. Then Otto Angke’s trial results were immediately brought into the Fuhrer’s room, then approved. When Germany occupied France via the Ardennese Dense Forest, or overthrew Eden Emael, or when Hitler’s expansionist desire to conquer Europe began, there were 35 million Pervitin pills used. Hitler himself could not be ascertained to consume pervitin or not, but according to medical records from Hitler’s personal psychiatrist, Dr. Theodor Morell, Hitler was even injected 800 times a year with various drugs, including opium, ampethamines, cocaine, and other drugs.
From the allies side, it was actually not much different. After the French conquest of Germany, Churchil’s personal physician discovered the fact that German troops used Pervitin and advised Churchil to use the same thing. But it seems that Churchil was very careful with methamphetamine because of its very dangerous long-term effects. Finally, it was known that British troops only use in very low doses, even for fighter pilots who experience aircraft downfall in order to survive a few days before being discovered. The drug was called BenzedrinSulfate, a low-dose methamphetamine.
When Hitler decided to conquer Russia, known as Operation Barbarosa, the use of Pervitin could not be separated from the war. In addition to deploying all its secret weapons, the use of pervitin was also increasingly massive. So the news about the effect was also spreading. Many troops were very addicted, hysterical, paranoid, and lost their temper. Pervitin might be one of the reasons why German troops were so cruel.
There were rumors among German soldiers that there was a German army unit struggling to approach Moscow, going crazy, shooting in any direction, even one army shooting his own commander, before finally surrendering at the hands of the Stalin red army. Then towards the end of the barbarosa operation, when the Germans lost their way and were beaten back by the red army, according to the notes of one of the doctors who participated in the combat unit, there was one unit that retreated back to Germany and was trapped in very heavy snow, under 30 degrees Celsius. They were exhausted, and were prepared to surrender or die from the cold snow. But finally the commander gave pervitin. 30 minutes later they were ready to walk again and were declared safe until returning to Germany.
The failure of the barbarosa “biltzkrieg” operation became the beginning of the defeat of Germany in the second world war. But Hitler chosed to stay with his fantasy of wanting to establish a Nazi empire on the plains of Europe. In 1944, a new research was launched and gave birth to a more dangerous new variant of the drug, called D-IX, chemical support level nine. D-IX consisted of nine ingredients. Three of the dominant ones werepervitin, cocaine, and morphine.
Concentration camps became test sites. Jewish prisoners became guinea pigs for these drugs. But Germany was beyond help, the allies had freed France, and were ready to enter Germany from the North. And the Russians were already furious, preparing to ravage Germany from the East side. In a bunker in Berlin, based on conventional historical records, after fulfilling his last promise to Eva Braun, a girlfriend who had never been married, namely to marry Eva Braun, Hitler finally decided to shoot himself. While Eva Braun has preceded him by swallowing cyanide pills.
Test of Agni Prime Missile and India’s Counterforce Temptations
South Asia is widely regarded as one of the most hostile regions of the world primarily because of the troubled relations between the two nuclear arch-rivals India and Pakistan. The complex security dynamics have compelled both the countries to maintain nuclear deterrence vis-à-vis each other. India is pursuing an extensive and all-encompassing military modernization at the strategic and operational level. In this regard, India has been involved in the development of advanced missiles as delivery systems and improvement in the existing delivery systems as well. Pakistan’s nuclear deterrent and delivery systems are solely aimed at India; however, India aspires to fight a ‘two-front war’ against Pakistan and China. Therefore, the size and capability of its nuclear deterrent and delivery systems are aimed at countering both threats. However, most of the recent missile delivery systems made by India appear to be more Pakistan-centric. One recent example in this regard is the recently tested nuclear-capable cannisterized ballistic missile Agni Prime, which is insinuated as Pakistan-centric. These developments would likely further provoke an action-reaction spiral and would increase the pace of conflict in South Asia, which ultimately could result in the intensification of the missile arms race.
Just quite recently, on 28th June 2021, India has successfully tested an advanced variant of its Agni missile series, namely Agni Prime or Agni (P). The missile has a range between 1000-2000 kilometers. Agni Prime is a new missile in the Agni missiles series, with improved accuracy and less weight than Agni 1, 2, and 3 missiles. It has been said that the Agni-P weighs 50 % less than the Agni-3 missile. As per the various media reports, this missile would take the place of Agni 1 and 2 and Prithvi missiles, however officially no such information is available. This new missile and whole Agni series is developed as part of the missile modernization program under the Defence Research and Development Organization’s (DRDO) integrated guided missile development program.
Agni-P is a short missile with less weight and ballistic trajectory, the missile has a rocket-propelled, self-guided strategic weapons system capable of carrying both conventional and nuclear warheads. Moreover, the missile is cannisterized with the ability to be launched from road and rail. The DRDO claimed that the test flight of the missile was monitored by the telemetry radar stations and its trajectory met all the objectives of the mission successfully with high level of accuracy. Agni-P missile because of its range of 1000 to 2000 km is considered a weapon against Pakistan because within this range it cannot target China. Although, India already has different missiles in its inventory with the same range as the newly developed and tested Agni-P missile, so the question arises what this missile would achieve.
Since the last few years, it has been deliberated within the international security discourse that India’s force posture is actually more geared towards counterforce options rather than counter-value options. Although, India’s nuclear doctrine after its operationalization in 2003, claims “massive retaliation” and “nfu” but in reality with developing cannisterized weapons like Agni-P, Agni 5, and testing of hypersonic demonstrative vehicles, India actually is building its capability of “counterforce targeting” or “splendid first strike”. This reflects that India’s nuclear doctrine is just a façade and has no real implication on India’s force modernization.
These developments by India where it is rapidly developing offensive technologies put the regional deterrence equation under stress by increasing ambiguity. In a region like South Asia, where both nuclear rivals are neighbors and distance between both capitals are few thousand kilometers and missile launch from one side would take only a few minutes in reaching its target, ambiguity would increase the fog of war and put other actors, in this case, Pakistan in “use it or lose it” situation, as its nuclear deterrent would be under threat.
In such a situation, where Pakistan maintains that nuclear weapons are its weapons of last resort and to counter threats emerging from India, its nuclear deterrence has to hold the burden of covering all spectrums of threat. It might be left with no choice but to go for the development of a new kind of missile delivery system, probably the cannisterized missile systems as an appropriate response option. However, as Pakistan’s nuclear deterrence is based on principle of “CMD” which allow Pakistan to seek deterrence in a cost-effective manner and also by not indulging in an arms race. Therefore, other than the threat of action-reaction dynamic developments like Agni P by India, would make weapons more accurate and lethal, subsequently conflict would be faster, ambiguous, and with less time to think. In such a scenario, as chances of miscalculation increase, the escalation dynamics would become more complex; thus, further undermining the deterrence stability in South Asia.
India’s counter-force temptations and development of offensive weapons are affecting the deterrence equilibrium in South Asia. The deterrence equation is not getting affected just because India is going ahead with the development of offensive technologies but because of its continuous attempts of negating the presence of mutual vulnerability between both countries. Acknowledgement of existence of mutual vulnerability would strengthen the deterrence equation in the region and help both countries to move forward from the action-reaction spiral and arms race. The notions such as the development of offensive or counterforce technology or exploiting the levels below the nuclear threshold to fight a war would not be fruitful in presence of nuclear weapons. As nuclear weapons are weapons to avert the war and not to fight the war.
Unmanned Aircraft Systems & The Annihilistic Future
The unmanned aircraft systems (UAS), commonly known as drones were introduced as a useful means to military, commercial, civilian and humanitarian activities but yet it ends up in news for none of its original purposes. Drones have rather resulted as a means of mass destruction.
The recent attacks on the technical area of the Jammu Air Force Station highlights the same. This was a first-of-its-kind terror attack on IAF station rather the Indian defence forces that shook the National Investigation Agency to National Security Guard. The initial probe into the attacks directs to involvement of Lashkar-e-Taiba, a terrorist group based out of Pakistan, in the drone attacks as the aerial distance from the point of attack was just 14 kilometers. The attacks took place via an Electric multi-rotor type drone between 11:30 P.M to 1:30 A.M on 27th June, 2021.
The above incident clearly points out the security issues that lie ahead of India in face to the asymmetrical warfare as a result of drones. The Indian Government after looking at the misuse of drones during the first wave of the pandemic realised that its drone regulations were nowhere sufficient and accountable and hence passed the Unmmaned Aircraft Rules, 2021. These rules imposed stricter requirement for obtaining license and authorisations by remote pilots, operators, manufacturers or importers, training organisations and R&D organisations, thereby placing a significantly high burden on the applicants but at the same time they also permit UAS operations beyond visual sight of line and allowing student remote pilots to operate UAS.
But these rules still don’t have any control on the deadly use of drones because multi-rotor drones are very cheap and readily available and what makes them lethal is their ability to be easily detected, additionally the night time makes it even worse. Their small size grants them weak radar, thermal, and aural signatures, albeit varying based on the materials used in their construction.
The pertinent issue to be understood here is that these rules can never ensure safety and security as they cannot control the purpose for which these drones maybe used. There are certain factors that are to be accounted to actually be receptive to such imminent and dangerous threats. Firstly, significantly increasing urban encroachments in areas around defence establishments, particularly air bases, has proved to be fatal. If frontline bases like Jammu or be it any other base when surrounded by unbuffered civilization poses two pronged problems, first it acts as high chances of being a vantage point for possible attackers and second, it also hampering the defence mechanism to come to an action. It is not limited to drone concerns but there have been cases of increased bird activity that has once resulted in engine failure of an IAF Jaguar and has caused similar problems all along.
Another important factor is that of intelligence. The Anti-drone systems will take their time to be in place and it is still a distant call to ascertain how effective will these systems be, so in the time being it is pertinent to focus on intelligence which may include sales and transfers of commercial drone, or the hardware that is required to build a basic multi-rotor drone. These are not something extraordinary because it is even in news when Pakistani drones were being used to supply weapons and ammunition to terror networks on Indian soil. Also, the past experience in handling ISIS have shown the weightage of intelligence over defensive nets.
Intelligence is no doubt a crucial factor in anticipation of drone attacks but what cannot be done away with is the defense mechanism. Efficient counter-drone technology is the need of the hour. DRDO has developed such technology that could provide the armed forces with the capability to swiftly detect, intercept and destroy small drones that pose a security threat. It is claimed that solution consists of a radar system that offers 360-degree coverage with detection of micro drones when they are 4km away, electro-optical/infrared (EO/IR) sensors for detection of micro drones up to 2 km and a radio frequency (RF) detector to detect RF communication up to 3 km and is equipped for both soft kills as well as hard kills.
Hence, the above analysis brings out the need of the application of an international instrument because the technology used in such drone attacks is at an evolving stage and the natural barriers still have an upper hand over be it either flying a pre-programmed path aided by satellite navigation and inertial measurement units (IMUs), or hand controlled to the point of release or impact, both methods have significant limitations as satellite and IMU navigation is prone to errors even when it comes to moderate flight ranges while manual control is subject to the human limitations such as line of sight, visibility as well as technical limitations such as distance estimation of the target, and weak radio links. An example of this could be the Turkish-made Kargu-2 model of killer drone can allegedly autonomously track and kill specific targets on the basis of facial recognition and Artificial Intelligence (AI). As the AI becomes better and better, these drone attacks become more and more terminal.
The recent COVID-19 pandemic is an eye opener for India as well as the world as none of the countries considered the possibility of bio-defenses or made a heavy investment in it even when there was awareness about lethal effects of genetic engineering. Hence, it should be the priority of the government to invest heavily in research and make the development of defensive technologies a national priority else the result of artificially intelligent killer drones would be much more catastrophic.
Russia’s National Security Strategy: A Manifesto for a New Era
The central feature of the new strategy is its focus on Russia itself. The Russian leadership has every reason right now to turn homeward to address the glaring weaknesses, imbalances, and inequalities of the country’s internal situation.
Russia’s new, forty-four-page National Security Strategy signed by President Vladimir Putin on July 2 is a remarkable document. It is much more than an update of the previous paper, adopted in 2015. Back then, relations with the West had already sharply deteriorated as a result of the Ukraine crisis, but were still considered salvageable; much of the liberal phraseology inherited from the 1990s was still in use; and the world still looked more or less unified. The current version of arguably the most important Kremlin strategy statement—covering not only national security issues, but a whole range of others, from the economy to the environment, and values to defense—is a manifesto for a different era: one defined by the increasingly intense confrontation with the United States and its allies; a return to traditional Russian values; and the critical importance for Russia’s future of such issues as technology and climate.
The strategy lays out a view of a world undergoing transformation and turmoil. The hegemony of the West, it concludes, is on the way out, but that is leading to more conflicts, and more serious ones at that. This combination of historical optimism (the imminent end of Western hegemony) and deep concern (as it is losing, the West will fight back with even more ferocity) is vaguely reminiscent of Stalin’s famous dictum of the sharpening of the class struggle along the road to socialism. Economically, Russia faces unfair competition in the form of various restrictions designed to damage it and hold it back; in terms of security, the use of force is a growing threat; in the realm of ethics, Russia’s traditional values and historical legacy are under attack; in domestic politics, Russia has to deal with foreign machinations aimed at provoking long-term instability in the country. This external environment fraught with mounting threats and insecurities is regarded as an epoch, rather than an episode.
Against this sobering background, the central feature of the strategy is its focus on Russia itself: its demographics, its political stability and sovereignty, national accord and harmony, economic development on the basis of new technologies, protection of the environment and adaptation to climate change, and—last but not least—the nation’s spiritual and moral climate. This inward focus is informed by history. Exactly thirty years ago, the Soviet Union collapsed just as its military power was at its peak, and not as a result of a foreign invasion. Having recently regained the country’s great power status and successfully reformed and rearmed its military, the Russian leadership has every reason now to turn homeward to address the glaring weaknesses, imbalances, and inequalities of the country’s internal situation.
The paper outlines a lengthy series of measures for dealing with a host of domestic issues, from rising poverty and continued critical dependence on imported technology to the advent of green energy and the loss of the Soviet-era technological and educational edge. This certainly makes sense. Indeed, the recent Kremlin discovery of climate change as a top-tier issue is a hopeful sign that Russia is overcoming its former denial of the problem, along with inordinately exuberant expectations of the promise of global warming for a predominantly cold country. After all, the Kremlin’s earlier embrace of digitalization has given a major push to the spread of digital services across Russia.
The strategy does not ignore the moral and ethical aspects of national security. It provides a list of traditional Russian values and discusses them at length. It sees these values as being under attack through Westernization, which threatens to rob the Russians of their cultural sovereignty, and through attempts to vilify Russia by rewriting history. In sum, the paper marks an important milestone in Russia’s official abandonment of the liberal phraseology of the 1990s and its replacement with a moral code rooted in the country’s own traditions. Yet here, the strategy misses a key point at the root of Russia’s many economic and social problems: the widespread absence of any values, other than purely materialistic ones, among much of the country’s ruling elite. The paper mentions in passing the need to root out corruption, but the real issue is bigger by an order of magnitude. As each of President Putin’s annual phone-in sessions with the Russian people demonstrates—including the most recent one on June 30—Russia is governed by a class of people who are, for the most part, self-serving, and do not care at all for ordinary people or the country, instead focusing single-mindedly on making themselves rich on the job. Money—or rather Big Money—has become that group’s top value, and the most corrosive element in today’s Russia. Therein lies perhaps the biggest vulnerability of modern Russia.
On foreign policy, the strategy is fairly elliptic, but it gives a hint of what the upcoming Foreign Policy Concept might include. The United States and some of its NATO allies are now officially branded unfriendly states. Relations with the West are de-prioritized and those countries ranked last in terms of closeness, behind former Soviet countries; the strategic partners China and India; non-Western institutions such as the Shanghai Cooperation Organization, BRICS, and the Russia-India-China trio; and other Asian, Latin American, and African countries. In addition to U.S. military deployments and its system of alliances, U.S.-based internet giants with their virtual monopoly in the information sphere, and the U.S. dollar that dominates global finances are also seen as instruments of containing Russia.
Overall, the 2021 Russian National Security Strategy seeks to adapt the country to a still interconnected world of fragmentation and sharpening divisions, in which the main battle lines are drawn not only—and not even mostly—between countries, but within them. Victories will be won and defeats suffered largely on domestic turf. Accordingly, it is the Home Front that presents the greatest challenges, and it is there that the main thrust of government policies must be directed.
From our partner RIAC
Carbon Market Could Drive Climate Action
Authors: Martin Raiser, Sebastian Eckardt, Giovanni Ruta* Trading commenced on China’s national emissions trading system (ETS) on Friday. With a...
10 new cities chosen for World Economic Forum circular economy initiative
The World Economic Forum’s Scale360° initiative announced today the 10 city-based hubs joining its Circular Shapers programme. Scale360° leverages innovation...
A New Era in US-Jordan Relations
King Abdullah of Jordan is the first Arab leader who met American President Joe Biden at the White House. The...
Reusing 10% Will Stop Almost Half of Plastic Waste From Entering the Ocean
It is possible to prevent almost half of annual plastic ocean waste by reusing just 10% of our plastics products....
USA and Australia Worry About Cyber Attacks from China Amidst Pegasus Spyware
Pegasus Spyware Scandal has shaken whole India and several other countries. What will be its fallout no one knows as...
The EU wants to cut emissions, Bulgaria and Eastern Europe will bear the price
In the last few years, the European Union has been going above and beyond in dealing with climate change. Clearly,...
NATO’s Cypriot Trick
When the Soviet Union collapsed and the Warsaw Pact died, there was much speculation that NATO would consider itself redundant...
Intelligence3 days ago
Pegasus: Human rights-compliant laws needed to regulate spyware
Energy2 days ago
Oil and the new world order: China, Iran and Eurasia
International Law2 days ago
Syrian Refugee Crisis: A Critical Analysis Concerning International Law
Africa Today3 days ago
Domestic violence, forced marriage, have risen in Sudan
Intelligence2 days ago
Afghan issue can not be understood from the simplistic lens of geopolitical blocs
Science & Technology3 days ago
Implementation of virtual reality and the effects in cognitive warfare
Americas2 days ago
Sinophobia grows in Argentina: The relations still the crucial one
Reports3 days ago
Global electricity demand is growing faster than renewables