Russia’s Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov has said that the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline will be launched irrespective of the US sanctions. Envisaged by the draft US defense budget for the 2020 fiscal year, the restrictions have already run into an adverse reaction in Europe and could further aggravate Washington’s relations with major European capitals, first of all, with Berlin.
The sanctions in question, which were imposed on the Nord Stream-2 and Turkish Stream gas pipelines, speak of the Congress’s desire to “do everything” to destroy relations with Russia. Nevertheless, both projects will go ahead, – Sergey Lavrov said following his visit to Washington on December 10th.
In the run-up to the Russian-American negotiations, the US Senate Committee on Armed Forces published a draft defense budget for 2020, which imposes sanctions on Russian energy projects. The draft says the restrictions on the Nord Stream 2 and Turkish Stream projects are introduced, no more, no less, to ensure Europe’s energy security.
According to the authors of the bill, the decision to include sanctions on the Nord Stream-2 project in the military budget was taken because there is no time now to elaborate a separate law regarding these restrictions. The idea is that sanctions should be introduced as early as possible in order to thwart the completion of the gas pipeline. Jim Rish, Chairman of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, points out that the restrictions will be applied against companies that supply vessels for laying pipes at a depth of 100 feet (about 30.5 m) below sea level.
The measures, which were approved by the House of Representatives on December 11, may directly affect foreign partners of Nord Stream 2 AG, a project operator Nord Stream 2, which comprise French Engie, Austrian OMV, British-Dutch Royal Dutch Shell, German Uniper and Wintershall, as well as a number of European contractors. The developers of the bill did their best: it could shut companies out of access to any operations in the United States or any work for American business around the world, including American credit resources. As for physical persons, employees of these companies may lose the opportunity to obtain an American visa; also, any transactions related to their property or interests in the United States will be blocked. Under available information, the initiators of the bill also intend to strike at three major companies involved in laying underwater pipelines and firmly integrated into the global market. These are the German “Uniper”, the Swiss “Allseas” and the Italian Saipem.
The campaign to introduce US sanctions against partners of the Russian PJSC Gazprom was initiated by Republican Senator Ted Cruz, who in May this year submitted a separate bill to the Senate on sanctions against foreign operators of pipe-laying vessels of the Nord Stream-2 gas pipeline. In July the Senate committee which deals with such issues voted in favor of the document. The Ted Cruise bill with the final amendments has become part of the draft defense budget. The Senator assured all parties concerned that “the Congress will approve, and the president will sign the target sanctions that will punish companies involved in the construction of the gas pipeline.” The Congressmen expect to adopt a defense budget before the Congress adjourns on December 20, 2019.
Commenting on the above mentioned document, Russian Foreign Minister Sergey Lavrov said that “the Congress is overwhelmed with the desire to do everything in its power to destroy our relations.”
However, at the last moment, Congressmen apparently tried to soften the earlier proposed sanctions. As follows from a conciliation report by members of the Senate and House of Representatives Committees on Armed Forces, the final version of the Ted Cruise bill contained yet more exceptions compared to the one passed by the related Senate Committee in July.
Approved after a three-month discussion, the bill envisages measures against foreign companies that supply vessels for the construction of the Nord Stream-2 and Turkish Stream pipelines but exempts companies that provide insurance and reinsurance services for such ships. Sanctions will not affect companies that guarantee the repair or maintenance of both pipelines.
Within 30 days of the entry into force of the bill the company can wrap up its work to provide operators of the Nord Stream-2 and Turkish Stream projects with pipe-laying vessels without facing sanctions. The Congress has also halved the maximum term of sanctions regime from ten to five years.
The President of the United States enjoys the right to make an exception and not to impose sanctions against a company that supplies ships for Gazprom projects, if this chimes in with the “US national security interests”.
In addition, the final version of the bill does not include potentially much more austere sanctions against the new Russian state debt.
In this respect, The Wall Street Journal reasonably argues that “sanctions directed against pipe-laying companies may trigger yet greater tensions between the US and Germany, which strongly opposes new sanctions.”
According to the newspaper, the Russian Gazprom and the government of German Federal Chancellor Angela Merkel “have long been prepared for the possibility of US sanctions, as reported by German officials and representatives of the Russian energy giant.” The Wall Street Journal quotes a top German official who spoke on condition of anonymity as saying that “the construction of the pipeline is coming to a close and that this project will be completed, despite the sanctions.” According to a German government representative, the Merkel Cabinet “rejects extraterritorial sanctions that affect German and European companies,” – the American edition says.
In Germany proper, many politicians have taken yet a tougher stance against US sanctions on Europeans. The fact that the German government submitted to the “economic attack” and “surrendered” to the United States over the construction of the Nord Stream 2 pipeline was voiced by Steffen Kotre, Speaker of the Alternative for Germany faction on energy issues in the Bundestag. According to Kotre, “the USA managed to link Nord Stream-2 with Ukraine, which it destabilized earlier.” The government of Angela Merkel is just unable to represent and defend the position of Germany at the moment, while the stability of Ukraine “has nothing to do with other economic projects,” – Steffen Kotre says.
A similar opinion came from Chairman of the Parliamentary Commission on Economics and Energy Klaus Ernst,who said Ukraine’s support for US sanctions undermines Germany’s energy policy and calls into question further assistance from the European Union. Kiev has received and continues to receive “substantial political and financial support from the European Union,” and at the same time, it supports US sanctions that undermine “our energy policy,” – Klaus Ernst said.
The German parliamentarian emphasized that if Washington imposes sanctions on the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline, Berlin may respond with retaliatory measures, such as increase duties on American liquefied natural gas.
Europe should take retaliatory measures in response to US sanctions against the Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline which are enshrined in the draft defense budget for the 2020 fiscal year, the German-Russian Chamber of Commerce said in a statement. The document emphasizes that this organization condemns extraterritorial sanctions against the pipeline construction project. According to OMV CEO Rainer Seele, “sanctions against the Nord Stream 2 project are a blow to Europe and Germany, a close ally.” Rainer Seele is convinced that Berlin and Brussels need to assume a clear political position and “respond with target measures,” since energy independence of European countries depends on it.
New US sanctions against the Russian Nord Stream 2 gas pipeline will hit EU sovereignty, – predicts Oliver Hermes, chairman of the East German Economy Committee: “If these sanctions come into force, it will be a direct blow to European Union sovereignty and a fatal signal for Paris’ peace efforts. ” The expert said that the participants in the “Normandy Four” summit in Paris on December 9 took new steps to achieve a settlement in Donbass “after years of idleness”. Considering this, American sanctions will constitute a threat to a “new, bold” approach to the situation in eastern Ukraine. Oliver Hermes made it clear that if the US imposes restrictions on Russia, energy prices for European consumers will gradually go up; in addition, sanctions n will “undermine transatlantic unity” and inflict damage on US projects in Europe.
“We must respond with countermeasures to the sanctions, which are detrimental to Europe,” – the head of the German-Russian Chamber of Commerce Matthias Shepp reaffirms: “It’s time for Berlin and Brussels to take a clear political position and respond with target countermeasures,” as the energy-political security of Europe is at stake. According to Matthias Shepp, Nord Stream 2 enhances Europe’s energy security by guaranteeing low energy prices in comparison with more expensive American liquefied natural gas. “The US wants to boost the supply of its liquefied gas to Europe with the help of sanctions. Meanwhile, Germany needs low energy prices for its energy-intensive industry to survive amid global competition,” – the head of the German-Russian Chamber of Commerce emphasizes.
Meanwhile, Ukraine hopes that the measures proposed by the American Congressmen will disrupt the implementation of the Nord Stream 2 project. However, Ukrainian experts recognize that “it will be difficult to push a number of major investors out of the project. Many have nothing to lose. Some feel the strong support of European governments, above all, German businesses. Given the circumstances, there is a chance that the construction will continue and will likely be completed, though with a considerable delay. ”
Given the situation, a lot will depend on the position of Germany and France as key EU players and major participants in the “Normandy process.” From both economic and political points of view, Berlin and Paris will lose a lot if they choose not to cooperate with Russia and block the implementation of the Nord Stream 2 project. In addition, the convincing victory of Brexit supporters in the UK’s early parliamentary elections on December 12 weakens the positions of the “Euro-Atlanticists” in Europe and those oriented at Washington. What also remains important is the deadline for completing the construction of the pipeline, since both the finalization of the pipeline project and the imposition of sanctions is a matter of just a few months.
From our partner International Affairs
Natural gas markets expected to remain tight into 2023 as Russia further reduces supplies to Europe
Russia’s continued curtailment of natural gas flows to Europe has pushed international prices to painful new highs, disrupted trade flows and led to acute fuel shortages in some emerging and developing economies, with the market tightness expected to continue well into 2023, according to the IEA’s latest quarterly Gas Market Report.
Natural gas markets worldwide have been tightening since 2021, and global gas consumption is expected to decline by 0.8% in 2022 as result of a record 10% contraction in Europe and unchanged demand in the Asia Pacific region. Global gas consumption is forecast to grow by only 0.4% next year, but the outlook is subject to a high level of uncertainty, particularly in terms of Russia’s future actions and the economic impacts of sustained high energy prices.
Russia has largely cut off gas supplies to Europe in retaliation against sanctions imposed on it following its invasion of Ukraine. This has deepened market tensions and uncertainty ahead of the coming winter, not just for Europe but also for all markets that rely on the same supply pool of liquefied natural gas (LNG).
“Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and sharp reductions in natural gas supplies to Europe are causing significant harm to consumers, businesses and entire economies – not just in Europe but also in emerging and developing economies,” said Keisuke Sadamori, the IEA’s Director of Energy Markets and Security. “The outlook for gas markets remains clouded, not least because of Russia’s reckless and unpredictable conduct, which has shattered its reputation as a reliable supplier. But all the signs point to markets remaining very tight well into 2023.”
The current gas crisis also casts longer-term uncertainty on the prospects for natural gas, especially in developing markets where its use was expected to rise at least in the medium term as it replaced other higher-emission fossil fuels.
European natural gas prices and Asian spot LNG prices spiked to record highs in the third quarter of 2022. This reduced gas demand and incentivised switching to other fuels such as coal and oil for power generation. In some emerging and developing economies, the price spikes triggered shortages and power cuts. Europe’s gas consumption declined by more than 10% in the first eight months of this year compared with the same period in 2021, driven by a 15% drop in the industrial sector as factories curtailed production.
Natural gas demand in China and Japan was almost unchanged in that same period, while it contracted in India and Korea. Chinese gas demand is forecast to increase by less than 2% this year, its lowest annual growth rate since the early 1990s. Meanwhile, natural gas prices in the United States hit their highest summer levels since 2008, yet North America was one of the few regions of the world where demand increased, supported by demand from power generation.
Europe has offset the sharp falls in Russian gas supplies through LNG imports, as well as alternative pipeline supplies from Norway and elsewhere. Europe’s surging demand for LNG – up 65% in the first eight months of 2022 from a year earlier – has drawn supply away from traditional buyers in the Asia-Pacific region, where demand dropped by 7% in the same period as a result of high prices, mild weather and continued Covid lockdowns in China.
The IEA forecasts that Europe’s LNG imports will increase by over 60 billion cubic metres (bcm) this year, or more than double the amount of global LNG export capacity additions, keeping international LNG trade under strong pressure for the short- to medium-term. This implies that Asia’s LNG imports will remain lower than last year for the rest of 2022. However, China’s LNG imports could rise next year under a series of new contracts concluded since the beginning of 2021, while a colder-than-average winter would also result in additional demand from northeast Asia, further adding to market tightness.
In addition to diversifying supply, the European Union and its member states have taken other steps to increase gas security, such as setting minimum storage obligations and implementing energy saving measures for the coming winter. EU storage facilities were close to 90% full as of end of September, though the absence of Russian supply presents challenges for refilling them next year. Both Japan and Korea have instituted policies to reduce reliance on imported LNG for power generation and have developed contingency plans for possible LNG supply disruptions.
For the new report, the IEA conducted a resilience analysis of the EU’s gas market in the case of a complete Russian supply shutdown starting from 1 November 2022. The analysis shows that without demand reductions in place and if Russian pipeline supply is completely cut, EU gas storage would be less than 20% full in February, assuming a high level of LNG supply – and close to 5% full, assuming low LNG supply. Storage falling to these levels would increase the risk of supply disruptions in the event of a late cold spell. A reduction in EU gas demand through the winter period of 9% from the average level of the past five years would be necessary to maintain gas storage levels above 25% in the case of lower LNG inflows. And a reduction in demand of 13% from the 5-year average would be necessary through the winter period to sustain storage levels above 33% in the case of low LNG inflows. Therefore, gas saving measures will be crucial to minimise storage withdrawals and keep inventories at adequate levels until the end of the heating season.
Mozambique Readies For Developing Mphanda Nkuwa Hydroelectric Project
Mozambique is ramping up efforts toward establishing a sustainable energy supply to drive its economy especially the industrialization programme. As it seeks reliable foreign partnerships, it has already shortlisted a few energy groups for the new US$4.5 billion Mphanda Nkuwa hydroelectric dam, on the Zambezi River, located in Tete province that is estimated to generate 2,070 megawatts for Mozambique. It will be 700 metres long and rise 86 metres above its foundations, with 13 floodgates.
The tender for the “Selection of the Strategic Partner or Investor for the Development of the Mphanda Nkuwa Hydroelectric Project” finally in December recieved the results of the market survey carried out in September involving the critical aspects of structuring the project, alignment with potential buyers and shareholder participation. The structure of the energy transmission line, the methodology for selecting the strategic partner, the implementation schedule, among other relevant issues related to the project transaction.
According to Malaysian newspaper The Star, the process of selecting the seven potential investors was made at the end of an investor conference held in Maputo. It further wrote that there were two individual companies and five large consortiums that previously visited the site to understand the natural conditions of the area and assess the fundamental data to prepare proposals from a technical, economic and financial point of view.
The newspaper estimated the infrastructure cost between US$4.5 and US$5 billion and have capacity to produce 1,500 megawatts, making Mphanda Nkuwa the second-largest hydroelectric dam in the country, after Cahora Bassa Hydroelectric (HCB), which generates 2,070 megawatts. With the two infrastructures in fully operational energy production, Mozambique hopes to achieve the goal of universal access to energy and respond to the growing energy deficit that plagues southern Africa.
General Director of the Mphanda Nkuwa development office, Carlos Yum, envisaged that during the construction phase, more than 7,000 jobs will be created, and 50 percent of the energy generated will be exported, contributing to the country’s economy and thus making a regional energy hub in Mozambique.
The Mphanda Nkuwa project will be a lower-cost power generation option which will position Mozambique as a regional energy hub, and contribute to universal access, industrialization, job creation and technical training while generating tax and concession fee revenue. The project is fundamental for the energy transition and decarbonization of the southern region of Africa.
Carlos Yum has laid out the status of the Mphanda Nkuwa hydroelectric dam construction project. According to Yun, the project is budgeted at around US$5 billion, and work will start in 2024, the year in which financing is expected to be definitively concluded.
The project will take a total of six to seven years to complete. Of the approximately US$5 billion price tag, 60% is for the construction of the dam and 40% for the power transmission line. At this moment, the development office is preparing the launch of public tenders for the updating of the project’s feasibility studies.
By December 2022, the office will launch a tender for the identification of the strategic investment partner, whose financial closing a 2024 deadline has been set. In terms of shareholding, the Mphanda Nkuwa project will have the participation of the Mozambican state, through Electricidade de Moçambique (EDM) and Cahora Bassa Hydroelectric [(HCB), with between 30% and 35% of shares. The remaining 65% will be secured from private investors.
Carta de Moçambique also informed that there would be consultants involved – from Brazil, the United States, Sweden and South Africa – to assess possible problems associated with the project according to the best international practices, avoiding pitfalls that have marred previous projects implemented in the province and in Mozambique generally.
It reported that experts and strategic investors, including the World Bank (WB) and the African Development Bank (ADB), have discussed some significant aspects concerning the implementation of the Mphanda Nkuwa hydroelectric project.
“Overall, we think this project is very important to the government’s goal of universal access by 2030,” said Zayra Romo, World Bank Mozambique Lead Energy Specialist and Infrastructure Practice Leader. As for the current stage of the project, which consists of the search for a strategic partner for the development of Mphanda Nkuwa, Romo said that the World Bank’s support would consist of ensuring the greatest possible competitiveness for the project, with a view to selecting the best contractor or investors that have experience to effectively manage Mphanda Nkuwa.
A press release from the Mphanda Nkuwa Implementation Office said that these companies and consortia had replied to the tender launched in December 2021, and delivered their pre-qualification documents before the deadline, first fixed on 28 February but, at the request of several of the bidders, it was extended to 18 April. It is hoped that construction of the new dam (which has been on the drawing board for decades) will finally begin in 2024. Construction will last for at least seven years.
According to the media release by the Mphanda Nkuwa Hydroelectric Project Implementation Office, the main objective is to ensure the coordination of actions for the implementation of the Mphanda Nkuwa project.
Location: The Mphanda Nkuwa Dam will be located in Tete Province, Centro region, on the Zambezi River, 61km downstream of the Cahora Bassa Hydroelectric Power Plant.
Project description: The Hydroelectric Power Plant will have a capacity of up to 1,500 Megawatts and an Electric Power Transmission Line from Tete to Maputo with 1,300 kilometres.
Budget: US$4.5 to US$5 billion, 60% for the construction of the dam and 40% for the power transmission line.
Strategic importance: The project will position Mozambique as an energy hub in southern Africa. It will provide lower cost energy in the country and region, contribute to universal access to energy in the country by 2030 and support rapid industrialization, with job creation, skills development and business opportunities (local content). Social and economic benefits, in the form of royalties and income on concession fees for the Mozambican state.
Environmental approach: The project will be implemented in strict compliance with national standards and internationally accepted best practices for the development of projects of this nature, to mitigate negative impacts and maximize positive aspects. In this context, the Mphanda Nkuwa Hydroelectric Project Implementation Office recently signed an agreement with the International Hydroelectricity Association for the assessment of the project’s sustainability, including training and capacity building.
Mozambique News Agency reported, citing government sources, that there were eight international consortiums interested to become strategic partners of Mozambique in building the Mphanda Nkuwa dam, with electricity production: ETC Holdings Mauritius, Longyuan Power Overseas Investment (Chinese), PowerChina Resources, WeBuild Group, Scatec (Norway), Sumitomo Corporation, EDF and Kansai Electric Power (Japan).
With an approximate population of 30 million, Mozambique is endowed with rich and extensive natural resources but remains one of the poorest and most underdeveloped countries in the world. It is one of the 16 countries, with a collective responsibility to promote socio-economic, political and security cooperation within the Southern African Development Community.
U.S. Government Likely Perpetrated Biggest-Ever Catastrophic Global-Warming Event
On September 28th, the AP headlined “Record methane leak flows from damaged Baltic Sea pipelines” and reported that “Methane leaking from the damaged Nord Stream pipelines is likely to be the biggest burst of the potent greenhouse gas on record, by far. … Andrew Baxter, a chemical engineer who formerly worked in the offshore oil and gas industry, and is now at the environmental group EDF … said, ‘It’s catastrophic for the climate.’” The article pointed out that methane “is 82.5 times more potent than carbon dioxide at absorbing the sun’s heat and warming the Earth.”
Russian President Vladimir Putin had been aiming ultimately (and maybe soon) to get the gas to Europe flowing again, and said to EU nations on September 16th, “Just lift the sanctions on Nord Stream 2, which is 55 billion cubic metres of gas per year, just push the button and everything will get going.”
Here is what U.S. President Joe Biden had already promised about that on February 7th:
If Germany — if Russia invades — that means tanks or troops crossing the — the border of Ukraine again — then there will be — we — there will be no longer a Nord Stream 2. We will bring an end to it.
Q But how will you — how will you do that exactly, since the project and control of the project is within Germany’s control?
PRESIDENT BIDEN: We will — I promise you, we’ll be able to do it.
He had promised to cause permanently the end of Nord Stream if Russia invaded, which it did on February 24th. He fulfilled on that promise on September 27th.
Radek Sikorsky, who is a Member of the European Parliament and had been Poland’s Foreign Minister and is the husband of the famous writer against Russia Anne Applebaum, and has been affiliated with Oxford Universisty, Harvard University, and NATO, tweeted on the day of the explosions, “Thank you, USA.” He also tweeted explanations: “All Ukrainian and Baltic sea states have opposed Nordstream’s construction for 20 years. Now $20 billion of scrap metal lies at the bottom of the sea, another cost to Russia of its criminal decision to invade Ukraine.” And: “Nordstream’s only logic was for Putin to be able to blackmail or wage war on Eastern Europe with impunity.”
Furthermore on September 27th, Germany’s Spiegel magazine reported that, as Reuters put it, “The U.S. Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) had weeks ago warned Germany about possible attacks on gas pipelines in the Baltic Sea”
On September 28th, SouthFront headlined “No Way Back for Europe” and reported:
It is reasonably suspected that the pipeline was blown up by the special services of the United States in order to finally stop the gas supplies to Germany from Russia.
On September 27, a detachment of warships led by the US amphibious assault ship USS Kearsarge reported on the completion of their tasks in the area of the alleged sabotage in the Baltic Sea and headed for the North Sea.
Since the beginning of September, suspicious activity by anti-submarine helicopters of the US Navy has been observed in the area. In the last few days, reconnaissance activities of NATO aircraft have significantly intensified in the Baltic Sea area. In particular, a US Boeing E-3 Sentry reconnaissance aircraft was on constant patrol over the Baltic States, and a US Joint STARS was spotted over Germany and Poland.
The dimensions of BRICS geography
Harnessing continental distance for the developing economies may be the single most important mission for BRICS and the New Development...
Uzbekistan and World Bank to Expand Strategic Partnership
Anna, Bjerde, World Bank Vice President for Europe and Central Asia, visited Uzbekistan from September 29 to October 2, 2022,...
Five ways media and journalists can support climate action while tackling misinformation
It’s a fact: media shapes the public discourse about climate change and how to respond to it. Even the UN’s...
Egypt: US$ 400 Million Project will Help to Improve and Decarbonize Logistics
World Bank approved a US$400 million development financing agreement to enhance the performance of the logistics and transportation sectors in...
How a U.S. Colony Works: The Case of Germany
On 15 July 2022, Britain’s Reuters news agency headlined “70% of Germans back Ukraine despite high energy prices, survey shows”,...
Fight against human trafficking must be strengthened in Ethiopia
Throughout Ethiopia’s Tigray, Afar and Amhar regions, women and girls are becoming increasingly vulnerable to abduction and sex trafficking as...
Natural gas markets expected to remain tight into 2023 as Russia further reduces supplies to Europe
Russia’s continued curtailment of natural gas flows to Europe has pushed international prices to painful new highs, disrupted trade flows...
Americas4 days ago
The latest Kissinger: Leadership and the eavesdropping on history
South Asia4 days ago
The South Asian Triangle
Intelligence4 days ago
Ethnic War a Newfangled Pakistani Forward-policy for Afghanistan
Defense3 days ago
Urgency of Reviewing India-Pakistan’s CBMs & Risk Reduction Measures
Europe3 days ago
Europe’s former imperial countries are now desperate U.S. colonies
Economy4 days ago
China-ASEAN Comprehensive Strategic Partnership: A Shared Future for Pursuing Regional Economy Integration
Science & Technology3 days ago
Competition in 5G Communication Network and the Future of Warfare
Tech News3 days ago
Battery-free smart devices to harvest ambient energy for IoT