Climate change is increasing the intensity and frequency of natural disasters in Asia and the Pacific. The tragic loss of life and the destruction wrought by recent flooding in the Islamic Republic of Iran is a reminder of the threat to lives, livelihoods and societies posed by extreme weather events. A reminder that only an integrated response to economic, social and environmental challenges can pave the way to sustainable development.
The floods which swept across the Islamic Republic of Iran in spring this year were devastating. They affected 10 million people and 500,000 people were displaced of which half were children. Hospitals and schools were destroyed, denying 100,000 children and education and thousands access to basic health care. Large sections of the country’s road network were affected, which will weigh on the economy, but also impact on many families’ daily lives. Damages have been estimated at $4.7 billion, a third of which concern the agricultural sector, critical to many livelihoods.
Yet as tragic and costly as the recent floods have been, they are also part of a wider phenomenon: the increasing risk of natural disasters outpacing resilience in the Islamic Republic of Iran and in Asia and the Pacific. Sand and dust storms, drought, desertification and wind erosion are all expected to rise in South-West Asia by 2030. Intensified by climate change, these disasters are becoming increasingly frequent. They hit the poor and vulnerable hardest, particularly in informal settlements. Some of Iran’s least developed provinces have suffered the most, with successive sand and dust storms destroying crops and infrastructure, and undermining people’s health, study and work.
These challenges exemplify why economic, social and environmental considerations must be considered together, if we are to effectively mitigate the consequences of natural disasters and achieve sustainable development. Evidence from across the globe tells us ignoring the social impact of economic growth can place a huge strain on societies, and at its worst lead to instability and conflict. Ignoring the environmental cost of economic growth in many parts of our region has led to climate change and an increased risk of natural hazards, which entrench poverty and perpetuate inequality. Nowhere is an integrated, multilateral response needed more than in Asia and the Pacific, the most disaster-prone region in the world.
With this in mind, the United Nations Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific (ESCAP) has worked with the Islamic Republic of Iran to establish the Asian and the Pacific Centre for the Development of Disaster Information Management (APDIM) in Tehran. It will deliver targeted capacity development for disaster information management and knowledge sharing. A regional cooperation mechanism for combatting the sand and dust storms has already been adopted. This will work to reduce the causes of risk of multiple hazards, develop a sand and dust storms alert system and tap regional partnership networks to enhance technical support where it is most needed.
My ambition is for APDIM to fit into a broader regional development and cooperation effort. One to reduce the inequality and environmental degradation which have accompanied recent exponential economic growth in our region. Our analysis shows the investment needed to achieve sustainable development in Asia and the Pacific is within reach. Developing countries’ investment needs stand at an additional $1.5 trillion per year, or five percent of their combined GDP. In the Islamic Republic of Iran, we estimate investments needed to climate-proof basic infrastructure are equivalent to roughly 1 per cent of Iran’s GDP in 2018. Further investment would be required in education and people centered approaches to build resilient communities and economy.
Sustainable development which balances economic growth with the need for social inclusion and environmental protection is essential to ensure a prosperous Iran today and a clean, compassionate and safe future for our children. Investing in people, as well as investing in skies, land and water can ensure that future. The Islamic Republic Iran has the means and the will. Yet persistence will be required to achieve this ambition, and the United Nations family stands ready to assist in any way it can in the months and years ahead.
A small deal but a big step in the right direction
Authors: Yang Yizhong & Paul Wang
After more than one year of tortuous negotiations and the quarrels between the United States and China, one trade deal was finally done on December 13. China announced that it and the United States have come to an agreement on a Phase One trade deal, and the White House stated the two sides having reached an historic and enforceable agreement that requires structural reforms and other changes to China’s economic including trade regime in the areas of intellectual property, technology transfer, agriculture, financial services, and currency and foreign exchange. This trade deal also establishes a strong dispute resolution system that ensures prompt and effective implementation and enforcement. Thus, the United States has agreed to modify its Section 301 tariff actions in a significant way.
There is widespread relief at the prospect of ending this conflict between the two biggest economies in the world. For example, the Dow Jones Index soared more than 100 points in reaction to China’s announcement of the deal. It argues that the Phase One trade deal aims to provide a “critical pause in the trade war which is on the verge of acceleration” and ensures trade relations “are still manageable by engagement for further negotiations in the same trajectory.” Yet, while there is cause for celebration, this deal doesn’t mean a conclusion to the trade dispute between China and the United States. At this moment, it is a small deal but a necessary step towards a right direction. Since China and the United States are different in their social, cultural and even geopolitical strategies, the ruling elites of the two sides need to demonstrate their political vision and conventional wisdom in order to ultimately determine the outcome of the whole trade disputes.
In light of Heckscher-Ohlin trade theory, developing countries like and India started to export their labor-intensive manufactures to the United States and the G-7 bloc, which trade their capital-intensive industrial products to China. As a result, the opening of China to world trade has profoundly affected other countries, the developed and the developing ones as well. Yet, the issue arises how can each entity understand the national politics of trade within the broader international context? How does the strategic and institutional environment affect whether countries get what they want from world trade? As American scholar Jeffry Frieden put it, when governments make national trade policies, they take into account what other governments are likely to do in response. A government that raises tariffs dramatically might find other countries retaliating with even higher barriers to its exports.
According to what is said above, great power trade dispute or economic competition is nothing new. Yet, the trade war between the United States and China is clearly beyond normal. It is argued that the rivalry between China and the United States in the 21stcentury holds an uncanny resemblance to the one between Germany and Great Britain in the 19th century. Both rivalries take place amidst the emergence of economic globalization and explosive technological innovation. Both feature a rising power with a state-protected economic system challenging an established democracy with a free-market economic system. And both rivalries feature countries enmeshed in profound interdependence wielding tariff threats, standard-setting, technology theft, financial power, and infrastructure investment for advantage. Due to this, the two powers have made all efforts to find a useful guide for each policymakers to defuse the dynamics of the emerging Sino-American trade war. Yet, this is not easy because the issue is beyond trade itself. There is a patently systematic clash between China and the United States, which is perceived of trying to suppress China’s development with every tool available. For the sake of this, the Chinese government has to calculate how much of a compromise it is willing to make.
Meanwhile, the hawkish groups in the U.S. are trying to stir up confrontation between the two countries. This is the very reason why the trade war had lasted so long and the talks on the issues remained so tortuous. Frankly, the United States has much more leverages in the talks with China. It requires that American response should neither be blindly provocative nor naively cooperative; instead it should be competitive. The right approach, in contrast to tariffs, would be to work with allies to strengthen rules, set standards, punish Chinese industrial policy and technology theft, invest in research, welcome the world’s best and brightest, and create alternatives to its geo-economic statecraft. Yet, the result is that China is playing a good hand well, simply because the Trump administration did not work together with its allies.
Deeply involved himself into the domestic partisan strife, Trump and his core team finally agreed on the text of a phase one economic and trade agreement, based on the principle of equality and mutual respect. The text includes nine chapters: the preface, intellectual property rights, technology transfer, food and agricultural products, financial services, exchange rate and transparency, trade expansion, bilateral assessment and dispute settlement, and the final terms. For sure China agreed to increase imports of U.S. agricultural products, and more importantly for the first time in any trade agreement, China has agreed to end its long-standing practice of forcing or pressuring foreign companies to transfer their technology to Chinese companies as a condition for obtaining market access, administrative approvals, or receiving advantages from the government. China also commits to provide transparency, fairness, and due process in administrative proceedings and to have technology transfer and licensing take place on market terms. In effect, the Phase One deal is generally in line with the main direction of China’s deepening reform and opening-up, as well as the internal needs for advancing with high-quality economic development.
Strategically, this is a relatively small deal but a truly necessary step in the right direction. All is clear that phase two negotiations depend on phase one implementation of phase one agreement, therefore, both sides have agreed to complete their necessary procedures including the legal review, translation, and proofreading as soon as possible, and discuss the detailed arrangements for officially signing the agreement. Once the deal is signed, China will increase imports of agricultural products from the United States. In turn, the U.S. will import pears, oranges, and fresh dates from China. The U.S. also pledged to lift some restrictions on Chinese aquatic products. As a Chinese official added that China’s core concern in economic and trade negotiations has been the removal of additional tariffs, and now both sides have reached consensus in this regard. As the two largest economies of the world—China and the United States, phase one trade deal is equally good news for all other countries and surely provides stability in global trade.
All in all, although there were disputes and quarrels during the long negotiations, the phase one trade deal between the two sides will result in shoring up confidence in the world economy and maintaining international trade order. A patent lesson is also that there is no winner in a trade war and China is dedicated to oppose to protectionism since it is against the rule of WTO. To that end, the two powers are expected to meet each other halfway, effectively manage their differences and foster a coordinated, cooperative and stable relationship. Therefore, it is fair to say that this landmark trade deal marks critical progress toward a more balanced trade relationship and a more level playing field for both sides’ national security and business interests.
IDA: Partnering with the Eastern Caribbean Small States
With its natural beauty, blue seas, and white sands, the Caribbean has long been a prized destination for visitors. The region’s location and geography – a source of tourist revenue – are also a source of high vulnerability. The Caribbean is situated in the path of powerful hurricanes, which are increasing in frequency and intensity as observed over the past few years, making disasters more than just a one-off event. The small territories and populations of Caribbean small island states constrain economic diversification, increase economic dependence on trading partners, and mean that a single shock can affect almost the entire country all at once. A disaster can cause damages and losses of over 200% of GDP in mere hours, as Dominica experienced in 2017.
Recognizing the unique challenges facing several Caribbean small island countries, the World Bank provides concessional long-term financing through the International Development Association (IDA) to Dominica, Grenada, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines – part of the Organisation of Eastern Caribbean States (OECS).
In the most recent funding cycle of IDA, which takes place every three years, financing available for these countries increased more than fourfold. The increase in concessional finance has helped to ramp up support for building the Caribbean’s cross-cutting resilience. This entails taking a 360-degree approach, going beyond immediate disaster recovery response, providing ex ante support, and addressing vulnerabilities at the fiscal, financial, infrastructure, human, and environmental levels.
It has also allowed the World Bank to accompany the region on many innovative programs, such as: a project to prepare for public health emergencies at the regional level, a framework to support the Blue Economy, progress on reducing marine pollution through bans on plastic bags and Styrofoam food containers, a regional program to develop the digital economy, and a broad-based fiscal resilience program. It has also further advanced financing for building back better, and for reducing disaster vulnerability of public infrastructure.
Increased financing brought significant support after natural disasters. After Hurricane Maria in 2017, the World Bank provided over US$100 million, of which US$50 million are grants – to help Dominica restore livelihoods, rebuild housing, build resilient roads and apply resilient agriculture practices.
Going beyond disaster response, the first aspect of building cross-cutting resilience is fiscal and financial. Countries need the resources to respond to disasters and invest in resilient infrastructure. The World Bank has been working closely with Grenada, Saint Lucia, and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines to develop fiscal responsibility rules and build fiscal buffers. This includes setting up contingency funds and improving domestic resource mobilization by strengthening tax collection and customs administration. The World Bank is preparing a contingent line of credit using IDA financing for the first time in the Caribbean as a rapid response and defense against disasters. A US$20 million contingent line of credit each for Grenada and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines is under preparation.
Secondly, IDA has invested in environmental resilience and natural resource management. The World Bank supported Grenada and Saint Vincent and the Grenadines to sustainably manage ocean resources and develop the blue economy, such as through policies to ban single use plastic bags and Styrofoam containers. Support also includes the Caribbean’s first World Bank-financed geothermal plant in Dominica. Over US$17 million in IDA funds, which helped mobilize over US$20 million in grant resources from other partners, will increase Dominica’s renewable energy and serve as an example of the huge geothermal potential for the region.
A third priority area for the Caribbean is building human capital, to maintain the dynamism and resilience of its population. Saint Lucia is establishing an essential public health benefits package and strengthening primary care with $20 million of IDA financing. Social assistance, education, and skills development initiatives are also being supported. A first ever $30 million regional health project is under implementation to improve the ability of public health systems to respond to health emergencies and increase resilience of health infrastructure.
Finally, IDA funds are helping Caribbean countries look toward future opportunities by improving digital and physical connectivity. Building on the Caribbean Regional Communications Infrastructure Program, which finances underwater sea cables, the World Bank is working with the region on a program to develop the digital economy. Support to physical connectivity focuses on air transport safety and the resilience of airports to natural disasters in Dominica, Grenada, and Saint Lucia, which also supports the tourism economy. Both these initiatives are expected to receive over US$100 million additional IDA financing.
By recognizing the special needs and vulnerabilities of these small island economies, IDA concessional financing is helping translate the Caribbean commitment to climate resilience into action. With its well-educated workforce of men and women, and a large share of youth, the region aspires to lead the way for developing a resilient, better connected, and more diversified economy. The World Bank is proud to be a partner, contributing to results and to the accomplishment of this goal.
Corporate Tax Havens
We’ve all heard the term in the media, or tossed around by savvy financial planners or accountants. But what are corporate tax havens? Are they legal? And can they help you reduce your tax liability?
Read on to learn more…
What is a Corporate Tax Haven?
In lay terms, a “tax haven” refers to any jurisdiction or country that offers minimal or substantially reduced tax liability to foreign businesses and individuals.
These so-called havens typically place an emphasis on privacy, sharing little to no financial information with other foreign tax authorities, and often do not require residency or a physical business presence within their borders for a business or individual to benefit.
Criteria to Qualify as a Tax Haven
Interestingly, there are a number of qualifying factors that a jurisdiction must meet in order to qualify as a tax haven. The OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development), in 1998, offered a number of criteria that could be used to identify such financial centers worldwide.
Tax Haven Characteristics:
- Zero, or minimal imposed tax on income
- Privacy standards and no exchange of information with other parties
- A lack of transparency (to improve privacy/anonymity)
What do Governments Have to Gain?
Tax havens are certainly attractive to investors, business professionals, and wealthy individuals. But what do governments stand to gain by establishing their jurisdiction as a tax haven?
Turns out tax havens have a lot to gain as well.
Benefits of Tax Havens for Countries and Governments:
- Despite the name, tax havens aren’t typically “free” of cost or fees. Although favorable from a tax liability perspective, they often charge a nominal tax rate while making up for fees in other areas such as high import duties.
- Registration fees and annual renewals. Some tax havens charge fees for registration, annual licensing and other fees.
- The attraction of foreign investors and money brings with it a vital infusion of capital into the local economy. Further, the country may benefit from ongoing business operations within its borders, such as investments in local infrastructure, offices, job opportunities and more.
As you can see, there are a number of built-in incentives for a government to operate a tax haven, including capital injection into the country’s economy where investments may flow into local businesses, financial institutions, and other vehicles.
Key Tax Haven Benefits
International tax havens have long been the preferred domicile for Fortune 100 companies, astute investors and privacy-minded individuals. But why?
1. No (or minimal) Tax Liability
As the name clearly suggests, these domiciles are havens for corporations, individuals and investors seeking to reduce their tax liability. Many developed countries have implemented a “progressive” tax system that places an increasing burden on those with higher income.
International tax havens offer a clear path to minimizing taxes safely and effectively, with many locales having zero corporate taxes, capital gains tax, personal income tax and more.
2. Privacy and Discretion
Corporate tax havens offer more than just tax savings. These locations boast unmatched privacy for individuals and corporations alike. Many tax havens accomplish this by not keeping any publicly accessible bank account or company information, and policies preventing them from sharing any recorded information with outside third parties (such as international tax agencies). For example, in Antigua and Barbuda, it is actually illegal for a bank to disclose account holder information to any third party. Interestingly, not even Antigua and Barbuda’s own government can access this information.
3. Security and Peace of Mind
International tax havens often play by their own rules, outside of the jurisdiction of (sometimes) overbearing nations such as the United States or the governing bodies of the EU. This level of independence can be a major benefit for individuals who have concerns about their privacy and outside governmental agencies such as the IRS, FAFT, OECD, and others overstepping their bounds.
Furthermore, most corporate tax havens do not participate in what are known as TIEAs or “Tax Information Exchange Agreements” with the EU or USA.
This means that even if outside organizations try to investigate or uncover information, there is no legal framework in place to allow them to do so.
For those seeking alternative locales to do financial business, corporate tax havens are attractive options due to their simplicity and well-defined processes for setting up new accounts. In fact, due to their business-friendly legislation, getting set up with many tax havens can take as little as 2-4 days. Not to mention business registration is typically low, with many jurisdictions charging $500 or less and can be done all without even visiting the country.
But that’s not where the convenience factor ends. In an effort to attract more business, many corporate tax havens work to make the process of running and managing a business within their domicile as easy as possible. This typically manifests as less paperwork and administration.
Highlighted Tax Havens
The number of popular tax havens is extensive. Below we’ll highlight two popular corporate tax haven destinations.
The nation island of Malta is a member state of the EU (European Union), a key reason why Malta passports are highly sought after around the world. Malta is a safe country, rich in culture and strategically located between Africa and Europe. Their program, simply named Malta’s Individual Investor Program (MIIP) is a popular option for many investors worldwide.
Malta’s Individual Investor Program (MIIP) Requirements:
- Contribution of €650,000 to the National Development and Social Fund
- Contribution of €25,000 for minor children and a spouse of the primary applicant
- Contribution of €50,000 for each dependent child age 18-26 or dependent parents age 55 or older
- Due diligence fees
- Residence in Malta for 5 years
- Purchase of property valued at €350,000 or lease a property at €16,000 or more per month
- €150,000 deposit in a government-approved financial instrument
Benefit of the Program:
- Advantageous tax system
- Tax concessions
- Centralized business hub
- Tax treaties with over 50 countries
- English as the primary language of business
- Access to free EU healthcare and education systems
- Malta passport opens up visa travel to over 160 countries
- Stable and safe country
- Lifetime citizenship can be passed to future generations
2. Saint Kitts and Nevis
The duel island nation, also sometimes referred to as the Federation of Saint Christopher and Nevis, represents one of the most popular corporate tax havens. Known for its charming islands and beautiful backdrop, the two offer what is known as the St. Kitts and Nevis Citizenship by Investment Program. This program, established in 1984 is the longest-running economic citizenship program worldwide.
Benefits of the Saint Kitts & Nevis Citizenship Program:
- Passport can be obtained within 6 months
- Enjoy citizenship in a Commonwealth country
- Dual citizenship is allowed
- Enjoy visa-free travel to more than 168 countries
- No physical residence required
- No education, test or interview requirements
- No tax on worldwide income
- Full citizenship for life that can be passed on to future generations
3. Other Popular Corporate Tax Havens Include
- Cayman Islands
- Isle of Man
- The Channel Islands
Corporate tax havens provide a myriad of benefits for those businesses and professionals seeking to reduce their tax liability, increase privacy, obtain second citizenships/passports and more. These benefits are key drivers for so many corporations, large and small, to seek out these domiciles for their business and investments. With proper due diligence and planning, you too can take advantage of all these havens have to offer.
A small deal but a big step in the right direction
Authors: Yang Yizhong & Paul Wang After more than one year of tortuous negotiations and the quarrels between the United...
IDA: Partnering with the Eastern Caribbean Small States
With its natural beauty, blue seas, and white sands, the Caribbean has long been a prized destination for visitors. The...
India and IEA hold workshop on EV charging infrastructure
The IEA, together with the India Bureau of Energy Efficiency and the Electric Vehicles Initiative, held a high-level workshop on...
Behind the Arab Spring: New Predications in 2020
To a certain extent, the Arab-Middle East experts, and politicians are truly aware of popular Arab uprisings and circumstances in...
Andaz Brand Debuts in Dubai With the Opening of Andaz Dubai The Palm
Hyatt Hotels Corporation announced today the official opening of Andaz Dubai The Palm. Joining Andaz hotels in top destinations around the...
Implementation of reforms continues to bring EU and Ukraine closer together
The new President, Parliament and Government of Ukraine have all stated their commitment to the continued implementation of the EU-Ukraine...
Indian Diplomacy: Aligning with the nation’s interests
India has been aiming higher and bolder since the arrival of the Narendra Modi government in 2014. One area where...
Intelligence2 days ago
The hi-tech war between China and the United States
Middle East3 days ago
The Formation of the Political Elite in Modern Iraq: The U.S. and Iranian Factors
Economy3 days ago
Corporate Tax Havens
Middle East2 days ago
Rojavan crisis: A big threat to women’s rights future
Europe2 days ago
Tourism3 days ago
The growing power of tourism
Energy1 day ago
“Balkan Stream”: Romania instead of Bulgaria?
East Asia2 days ago
Hong Kong: No more China’s disheartened capitalism, please