Connect with us

Terrorism

The Difficulty With Words and When is a Terrorist a Terrorist?

Published

on

Words are beautiful and they give us so much. Through using words we can share ideas and more importantly we can develop concepts and literally take things forward. They inform, they entertain and they explain.

They form the framework through which we understand everything from science to art to religion. They are created by our culture and in turn they create our culture. And they are dynamic, evolving and developing as we create new words and change the meaning of existing words to reflect the changing world that we live in. But it is perhaps their dynamic nature that creates the greatest challenge that words present.

In some ways the creation of words is simple. All that it takes is for one person to say something and another to understand it and we have a new word. Changing the meaning of a word is not as simple but it still happens. And it happens often. Collectively as we modify the meaning and the usage of words in everyday use we change their meaning. Sometimes entirely, sometimes subtly and sometimes we expand their meaning and dictionaries are amended and updated to reflect the change. That is except for in a legal context where their meaning cannot be as dynamic and in this context at least, their meaning can be literally carved in stone.

In legal English we find words in use that have fallen out of use in everyday language as they are no longer relevant or because they relate to concepts that are rarely encountered in our modern lives. Whereas the legal definition of words that have fallen out of everyday usage can remain straightforward, what of the words whose definition has changed. Here we have one use for most contexts and one for legal usage. A forest is a densely wooded area, correct? Well, yes and no. In everyday speech yes, a forest is a densely wooded area, but the legal definition of a forest is an area reserved for hunting, possibly for but not necessarily exclusively by a monarch. And what of the word assault? To assault means to attack. We hear it in the news when one person attacks another or in a military context when one nation attacks another. But in a legal context we have to turn the clock back to see how the word was being used when its legal definition was determined under common law as to act in a manner that would make one feel that they were about to be attacked. In fact one can be assaulted without any physical contact occurring, which is significantly different from the situation where a person is attacked or a nation invaded. With the need for the law to be known and be predictable the definition of words in a legal context must also be known and predictable. Although the law is dynamic, the definition of the words used to create the law must be static.

In most cases, although we have conflicting definitions for the same word, we rarely face any complications. If we incorrectly use the word forest, or even assault, it is unlikely that there will be any significant consequences. But what about words that relate to more complex and more serious concepts such as terrorism. Although terrorism doesn’t have two conflicting meanings, there is significant debate about what is terrorism, what isn’t terrorism and more importantly what might be terrorism. And this is particularly challenging as in many cases there are serious legal sanctions reserved only for those convicted of terrorism including execution or the removal of citizenship.

So what is terrorism? If we take a simple definition it is the use of violence in the pursuit of a political aim. Ok, that’s straightforward enough but it is very broad. Is it any violence? And what about terror? Surely a definition of terrorism should include a reference to terror. If we look in more detail at a more academic definition we might find terrorism defined as the use of violent acts with the aim of inducing a feeling of terror in the general population in the pursuit of a political aim. Now this definition tells us a little more, it is not the acts of violence in themselves that are intended to advance the political aim but the perception that they create amongst the population. But the academic definition introduces it’s own confusion by looking at not just the acts and their purpose but also considers whether they are justifiable. It is often said that one man’s terrorist is another man’s freedom fighter. Nelson Mandela and Jose Gusmão were both labeled as terrorists at one time.

Although academia can help us to understand terrorism in its broadest sense it is in a legal setting that we really must have an accurate and reliable definition of terrorism but unfortunately it is one where perhaps we don’t. Over recent years many nations have updated their existing and introduced new anti- terrorism legislation. Arguably this is necessary as terrorism has changed significantly. Whereas it typically consisted of relatively small acts of violence designed to induce fear they have evolved to include massive and catastrophic acts of mass murder. As a result ant-terrorism laws have been expanded to include more and more specific acts within the definition of acts of terrorism. But does this evolution of terrorist tactics really warrant this expansion of the legal definition of terrorism?

Given the sizeable amount of anti-terrorism legislation that many nations have introduced in recent years it is perhaps the legal definition of terrorism rather than the everyday definition that has changed the most. Although both definitions have expanded, the everyday and academic definitions have essentially remained the same in that terrorism is the pursuit of a political aim through a campaign of violent acts intended to create feelings of terror in the general population. The legal definition by comparison has expanded to include criminal acts that may or may not be motivated by a political aim. Arguably it is the everyday and academic definitions that give us the most accurate, reliable and credible definition of terrorism and it is this definition that we should use in a legal context also.

Continue Reading
Comments

Terrorism

Western strategic mistake in the Middle East

Sajad Abedi

Published

on

The widespread terrorist acts and catastrophic events of 2016 in Europe have revealed new approaches to extremist and radical groups to create fears among Westerners.

The investigation of the destructive actions of two past years has shown that such terrorist operations were based on networked and coordinated approaches. That is, the terrorist cells carried out their destructive actions based on a timetable group plan. In such circumstances, it is possible to observe such behaviors, given the familiarity of security guards and intelligence agencies in Europe, but it is difficult to change the approaches to monitoring such actions in the two past year. Instead of taking collective action, terrorists use the means of mass destructive actions in their new ways. In such a situation, a person kills public places instead of communicating with the supporters or members of terrorist currents such as ISIL with the aim of shedding people’s blood. Events like the French Nazi Crusade, or the accumulation of people in Germany, have been blamed for such an approach. Naturally, the use of such methods and the use of public transport vehicles, or even sticks and gadgets, has provided security and intelligence agencies with a great deal of difficulty in detecting criminal agents.

Evidence suggests that in the new approaches of the ISIL, they are seeking to use any means to achieve their goals, and it is natural that in these circumstances the concept of security in Europe has a change undergone. From another perspective, the use of such practices shows that the Isis are seeking to use any means to demonstrate their power and, along with this issue, to supporters and groups that want to recruit and join terrorist groups. They order that they do not necessarily have to endure the journey to accompany them, but that pro-active agents can arrange their subversive moves at the same location. The facts indicate that the only wolves used for ISIS terrorist groups are the instigation of this issue to Westerners, which, despite the efforts of some countries to eliminate ISIS’s fears, and fears of Europeans from recurring events the terrorists will not end.

ISILs are always trying to organize people from the corners of the world for terrorist acts; those who are known for wolves only because of the nature of isolation and psychological frustration. That is why, with many beliefs, this group is now considered to be the most dangerous terrorist organization. In the current situation, although the possibility of reversing and defeating ISIL in the region and eliminating the danger of the formation of the Islamic Emirate of Iraq and the Shamal seems probable, it is important to understand that different groups, including ISIS and other organized terrorist groups, are based on ideological. It seems that in such a case, the disintegration of the organization will not eliminate ISIL’s thoughts, but those who have such intellectual foundations will underground forms of state-controlled current state of affairs. Continue their terrorist operations.

While the West’s false policy on dual use of terrorism against the developments in the region, especially in Iraq, Yemen, Syria and Libya, is a major contributor to terrorism, the immigration of citizens from different countries, including Europe to Syria and the return of Western terrorists to Europe. Today, more than any other country in Europe is the target of ISIS attacks in Europe, which in the developments in Syria, we saw that the country adopted the strongest positions in support of irresponsible armed groups and some terrorist groups.

We are now witnessing an unholy unity among apparently secular currents claiming liberty with radical Fascist currents and their consensus over the limitation of Islamic groups and the suppression of Muslims. In fact, now, the West is not only captured by ISIS terrorist incidents, but is also threatened by extremist rightwing people who have received a high vote in some elections because of Islamophobia. The same groups that have tackled the asylum seekers have been slogans for victorious dynasties.

On the one hand, non-Muslims who carry out acts of terrorism on the basis of personal or even religious beliefs carry out terrorist acts, the westerners regard the disciples, but at the same time, any Muslim who subjugates propaganda acts based on non-Islamic and non-religious ideas of the Islamic State is a circle Muslims consider his actions taken from Quranic teachings.

Along with this, it should be noted that the West is fully aware of Saudi Arabia’s role in current supporting terrorist. The evidence clearly shows the country’s financial and spiritual backing of the jihadist Salafi in 2001 and Takfiri Salafi since 2011, and the US Senate’s 28-page report contends. However, an attempt by Western countries to pressure Saudi Arabia or change it’s political, military, and economic relations with the country does not take place.

At the beginning of the formation of ISIS, the West had the hope that with the issuance of radical Islamists to Syria and Iraq and the emergence of conflicts among Islamic countries, the Takfiris’ duty would be completely determined, and the countries of the region would be involved in tribal conflicts. The formation of such a subjectivity in the West, of course, was due to the fact that the insecurity of the region would provide a platform for Islamism and their more active presence in the Middle East and West Asia, but we saw that prostitutes of the chickens return to the nest in Europe, and that the boomerang ISIS sat back in the heart of Europe.

Of course, not all terrorist attacks in Europe can be attributed to the organization of ISIS, and it seems that the basic premise of terrorists is based mainly on the basis of their thinking and reasons, such as family and mental problems, on subversive acts. ISIS, however, uses all its media capabilities to take advantage of these actions, and it has tried to magnify its operational capability by assigning individuals who have sometimes died as a result of terrorist acts and suicide attacks.

On the other hand, terrorism should be viewed as a global issue, and at the same time it should be emphasized that foreign policy of some countries and their interference in the affairs of other countries is one of the factors of the emergence and spread of terrorism. These countries must rethink their policies in order to provide a ground for the elimination of terrorism.

Continue Reading

Terrorism

UN launches new framework to strengthen fight against terrorism

MD Staff

Published

on

United Nations Secretary-General António Guterres launched a new Organization-wide framework on Thursday to coordinate efforts across the peace and security, humanitarian, human rights and sustainable development sectors.

Termed the UN Global Counter-Terrorism Coordination Compact, the framework is an agreement between the UN chief, 36 Organizational entities, the International Criminal Police Organization (INTERPOL) and the World Customs Organization, to better serve the needs of Member States when it comes to tackling the scourge of international terrorism.

Speaking at the first meeting of the Compact’s Coordination Committee, at the UN Headquarters, in New York, Mr. Guterres highlighted the need to ensure full respect for international human rights standards and rule of law in countering terrorism.

“Policies that limit human rights only end up alienating the very communities they aim to protect and which normally have every interest in fighting extremism,” he said, adding that as a result “such policies can effectively drive people into the hands of terrorists and undermine our efforts on prevention.”

He also urged greater vigilance against the misuse of emerging technologies such as artificial intelligence, drones and 3D (three-dimensional) printing, as well as against the use of hate-speech and distortion of religious beliefs by extremist and terrorist groups.

According to the UN Office of Counter-Terrorism, the Coordination Committee will oversee the implementation of the Compact and monitor its implementation. It is chaired by UN Under-Secretary-General for counter-terrorism, Vladimir Voronkov.

At its meeting, the Coordination Committee also discussed strategic priorities for the next two years, based on the sixth review of the Global Counter-Terrorism Strategy, relevant Security Council resolutions and UN Counter-Terrorism Executive Directorate (CTED) assessments as well as Member States requests for technical help.

It also looked into the organization of work and ways to improve the delivery of an “All-of-UN” capacity-building support to Member States.

The UN Global Counter-Terrorism Coordination Compact Task Force will replace the Counter-Terrorism Implementation Task Force, which was established in 2005 to strengthen UN system-wide coordination and coherence of counter-terrorism efforts.

Continue Reading

Terrorism

ISIL’s ‘legacy of terror’ in Iraq: UN verifies over 200 mass graves

MD Staff

Published

on

Investigators have uncovered more than 200 mass graves containing thousands of bodies in areas of Iraq formerly controlled by the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant (ISIL/Da’esh), according to a United Nations human rights report out on Tuesday.

The Office of the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) and the UN Assistance Mission in Iraq (UNAMI) said the 202 mass grave sites were found in governorates of Nineveh, Kirkuk, Salahuddin and Anbar in the north and western parts of the country – but there may be many more.

In the joint report, Unearthing Atrocities, the UN entities said the evidence gathered from the sites “will be central to ensuring credible investigations, prosecutions and convictions” in accordance with international due process standards.

Ján Kubiš, the top UN official in Iraq and the head of UNAMI, said that the mass grave sites “are a testament to harrowing human loss, profound suffering and shocking cruelty.”

“Determining the circumstances surrounding the significant loss of life will be an important step in the mourning process for families and their journey to secure their rights to truth and justice,” he added.

Between June 2014 and December 2017, ISIL seized large areas of Iraq, leading a campaign of widespread and systematic violations of international human rights and humanitarian law, “acts that may amount to war crimes, crimes against humanity, and possible genocide,” the report states.

Traumatized families have the ‘right to know’

The UNAMI-OHCHR report also documents the “significant challenges” families of the missing face in trying to find the fate of their loved ones.

At present, they must report to more than five separate authorities, a process that is both time-consuming and frustrating for traumatized families.

Michelle Bachelet, the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, underscored that the families “have the right to know.”

“ISIL’s horrific crimes in Iraq have left the headlines but the trauma of the victims’ families endures, with thousands of women, men and children still unaccounted for,” she said.

“Their families have the right to know what happened to their loved ones. Truth, justice and reparations are critical to ensuring a full reckoning for the atrocities committed by ISIL.”

The report documents 202 mass grave sites across Iraq, amid fears that there could be more. Source: UNAMI-OHCHR report

Victim-centred approach needed

Among its recommendations, the report calls for a victim-centred approach and a transitional justice process that is established in consultation with, and accepted by, Iraqis, particularly those from affected communities.

It also urges a multidisciplinary approach to the recovery operations, with the participation of experienced specialists, including weapons contamination and explosives experts and crime scene investigators.

Alongside, it also calls on the international community to provide resources and technical support to efforts related to the exhumation, collection, transportation, storage and return of human remains to families, as well as their identification, particularly by helping strengthen the national Mass Graves Directorate.

Continue Reading

Latest

Trending

Copyright © 2018 Modern Diplomacy