The Dutch election, Trump's guests and tedium

E
very so often the laws of nature appear to reverse, as when cold air is trapped on the earth's surface in a thermal inversion, enveloping people in a smog of pollution. Such has been the recent experience of the Dutch politically, until a blast of fresh air on Wednesday sanitized the country.

The Dutch election came as a relief to mainstream political parties in Europe after Brexit in Britain and the election of Donald Trump in America. Geert Wilders the Dutch populist, anti-immigrant, Koran and Mosque banning firebrand simply burned himself out. At one point leading in the polls with 25 percent, there were fears he might win a plurality and have the prerogative of being the first to be asked to form a government -- although an impossibility as the other major parties had refused any alliance. Even so it would have delayed the formation of a new governing coalition.

None of it came to pass. Mr. Wilders came a distant second with 20 seats and only 13 percent of the vote. Outgoing prime minister Mark Rutte's center right party was the greatly relieved winner of 33 seats although it lost 8. A big winner was Jesse Klaver's GreenLeft which boosted its seats from 4 to 14. It was in its way a repudiation of Geert Wilders and his hate rhetoric for the attractively boyish Mr. Klaver has a Moroccan father and a mother of Indonesian descent.

The Dutch Labor party PvdA suffered an historic defeat losing 29 seats our of the 38 held previously. Their traditional voters chose smaller left wing parties and GreenLeft. Might it portend the fate of British Labor unless they can marshal their supporters before the next election?

All in all not a bad week for the Dutch who ended it with their heads high and their liberal/moral credentials intact. Then, was it not Hugo Grotius who initiated the concept of just war in the West, sparing civilians and prisoners of war and so forth.

In the U.S., our own homegrown populist was busy exercising his charms on Germany's Angela Merkel, here on a very brief one-day visit, her hand strengthened by Wilders poor showing. Asked by the press to shake hands for a photo, President Trump ignored the request. No doubt a great relief for the Chancellor as 87 percent of Germans in a January poll felt he was not good for Germany. A photo like that could have been plastered all over by her opposition before the forthcoming election on September 24th. They did shake hands although more privately and not posed.

The Dutch election results have fortified the EU drivers. Marine Le Pen's star seems to have peaked and the latest betting odds offered have Emmanuel Macron an odds-on favorite. While bookmakers can be wrong, Le Pen's chances in the French second round look remote. That Britain is adrift, facing a possible breakaway Scotland, has been sobering to other electorates. Being part of the EU has definite advantages.

As Angela Merkel obliquely pointed out, addressing the press instead of Donald Trump, who was bemoaning Germany's great trade deal with the United States, her country has long surrendered trade negotiations to the EU in Brussels -- a large trading block comparable to the U.S. and consequently a more powerful negotiator. And as she has pointed out earlier, why can't American manufacturers turn out cars Americans want to buy.

Little Britain adrift in a sea of sharks had Theresa May running to Washington doubly eager to sign a trade deal to allow it to swim in the wake of one of the biggest fish around. It doesn't take great art for Mr. Trump to figure that deal, but just wait for Mr. Xi's visit. He has already had him retreat from attempts at a two-China policy without moving a muscle. That's one tough cookie, as they say.

Perhaps a bigger problem for Mr. Trump is his idee fixe. He is beginning to be tedious, and nothing turns off the public faster than a one-trick pony -- in Trump's case squeezing more money for the US out of friends and rivals alike, the so-called bad trade deals and countries not paying enough for their defense. Once the public has had enough, there goes the second term.

Dr. Arshad M. Khan

Dr. Arshad M. Khan is a former Professor based in the US.  Educated at King's College London, OSU and The University of Chicago, he has a multidisciplinary background that has frequently informed his research.  Thus he headed the analysis of an innovation survey of Norway, and his work on SMEs published in major journals has been widely cited.  He has for several decades also written for the press:  These articles and occasional comments have appeared in print media such as The Dallas Morning News, Dawn (Pakistan), The Fort Worth Star Telegram, The Monitor, The Wall Street Journal and others.  On the internet, he has written for Antiwar.com, Asia Times, Common Dreams, Counterpunch, Countercurrents, Dissident Voice, Eurasia Review and Modern Diplomacy among many.  His work has been quoted in the U.S. Congress and published in its Congressional Record. 

ABOUT MD

Modern Diplomacy is an invaluable platform for assessing and evaluating complex international issues that are often outside the boundaries of mainstream Western media and academia. We provide impartial and unbiased qualitative analysis in the form of political commentary, policy inquiry, in-depth interviews, special reports, and commissioned research.

 

MD Newsletter

 

 

RSS Feeds from MD

Regions
Topics
NewsRoom

Top